ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00619866

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis

NCT00619866, Phase 2, Completed, AbbVie; results first posted 2018-09-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis. Trials, record NCT00619866. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00619866

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis
NCT number
NCT00619866
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
155 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Conditions
Endometriosis, Pain
Interventions
Elagolix, placebo
First posted
2008-02-21
Last updated
2018-09-07
Results first posted
2018-09-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12Baseline and week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainBaseline and weeks 4 and 8
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreBaseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12
Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (or "no pain") for the NRS was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero ("no pain") for non-menstrual pelvic pain was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero ("no pain") for dysmenorrhea was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero ("no pain") for the non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea total score was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12Baseline and week 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainBaseline and weeks 4 and 8
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoreBaseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain ScoresBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRSBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily AssessmentBaseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.
percentage of daysMEAN

Results by group239

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12Placebo-0.88Standard Error 0.18units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12Elagolix 150 mg-1.19Standard Error 0.18units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12Elagolix 250 mg-1.25Standard Error 0.18units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainPlaceboWeek 4-0.60Standard Error 0.17units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainElagolix 150 mgWeek 4-0.90Standard Error 0.17units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainElagolix 250 mgWeek 4-0.83Standard Error 0.17units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainPlaceboWeek 8-0.71Standard Error 0.18units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainElagolix 150 mgWeek 8-1.23Standard Error 0.17units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainElagolix 250 mgWeek 8-0.94Standard Error 0.17units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis PainPlaceboWeek 4-1.27Standard Error 0.32units on a scale

Participant flow30

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Weeks 1 - 12STARTEDPlacebo52
Weeks 1 - 12STARTEDElagolix 150 mg51
Weeks 1 - 12STARTEDElagolix 250 mg52
Weeks 1 - 12STARTEDPlacebo / Elagolix 150 mg0
Weeks 1 - 12STARTEDPlacebo / Elagolix 250 mg0
Weeks 1 - 12COMPLETEDPlacebo38
Weeks 1 - 12COMPLETEDElagolix 150 mg45
Weeks 1 - 12COMPLETEDElagolix 250 mg42
Weeks 1 - 12COMPLETEDPlacebo / Elagolix 150 mg0
Weeks 1 - 12COMPLETEDPlacebo / Elagolix 250 mg0

Adverse events39

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1521
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersElagolix 150 mg6697
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersElagolix 250 mg6726
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsPlacebo3523
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsElagolix 150 mg2694
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsElagolix 250 mg3724
otherSINUSITISInfections and infestationsPlacebo2522
otherSINUSITISInfections and infestationsElagolix 150 mg6696
otherSINUSITISInfections and infestationsElagolix 250 mg2722
otherUPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestationsPlacebo3523

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo052
Total, all-cause mortalityElagolix 150 mg069
Total, all-cause mortalityElagolix 250 mg072
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1852
Total, other adverse eventsElagolix 150 mg3169
Total, other adverse eventsElagolix 250 mg3372
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo052
Total, serious adverse eventsElagolix 150 mg069
Total, serious adverse eventsElagolix 250 mg172

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00619866

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00619866/registered?page=2