Trial ยท NCT00619866
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis
NCT00619866, Phase 2, Completed, AbbVie; results first posted 2018-09-07
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis. Trials, record NCT00619866. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00619866
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- An Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix (NBI-56418) in Women With Endometriosis
- NCT number
- NCT00619866
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 155 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Conditions
- Endometriosis, Pain
- Interventions
- Elagolix, placebo
- First posted
- 2008-02-21
- Last updated
- 2018-09-07
- Results first posted
- 2018-09-07
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes26
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Baseline and weeks 4 and 8 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly mean NRS is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The monthly peak NRS is the maximum of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe) in an e-Diary. The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The monthly mean sum of dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The NRS is an 11-point scale used to measure endometriosis pain and was completed at approximately the same time each day using an electronic diary (e-Diary). Participants were instructed to select a single number between 0 (No pain) and 10 (Worst pain ever) that best described their endometriosis pain at its worst over the past day. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero (or "no pain") for the NRS was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No pelvic pain * 1 = Mild pelvic pain; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pelvic pain; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * 3 = Severe pelvic pain; subject could not do most or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero ("no pain") for non-menstrual pelvic pain was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * Subject is not having her period * 0 = No pain related to period * 1 = Mild pain related to period; subject could not do some of the things she usually does * 2 = Moderate pain related to period; subject could not do many of the things she usually does * = Severe pain related to period; subject could not do most of or all of the things she usually does. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero ("no pain") for dysmenorrhea was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | Participants assessed dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain not related to menses and their impact on daily activities at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The sum of the dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores on each day were calculated to create a daily total score. On days the participant was not having her period, the dysmenorrhea score was not defined; hence, the total score was equal to the non-menstrual pelvic pain score (range 0 to 3). On days where the participant recorded menstruation the total score ranged from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate more severe pain. The percentage of days a participant reported a value of zero ("no pain") for the non-menstrual pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea total score was calculated for the 4 weeks prior to each visit. |
1 to 10 of 26Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 26 registered outcomesOutcomes26
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | Baseline and week 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Baseline and weeks 4 and 8 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Total of Dysmenorrhea and Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Scores | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based on NRS | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | percentage of days | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | percentage of days | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | percentage of days | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Days With No Pain Based Based on Total Score of Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain and Dysmenorrhea Daily Assessment | Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 | All randomized participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug and reported at least 10 e-Diary NRS values during the initial 12 week treatment period. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point. | percentage of days | MEAN |
1 to 10 of 26Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 26 outcomesResults by group239
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | Placebo | -0.88 | Standard Error 0.18 | units on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | Elagolix 150 mg | -1.19 | Standard Error 0.18 | units on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain at Week 12 | Elagolix 250 mg | -1.25 | Standard Error 0.18 | units on a scale | |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Placebo | Week 4 | -0.60 | Standard Error 0.17 | units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Elagolix 150 mg | Week 4 | -0.90 | Standard Error 0.17 | units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Elagolix 250 mg | Week 4 | -0.83 | Standard Error 0.17 | units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Placebo | Week 8 | -0.71 | Standard Error 0.18 | units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Elagolix 150 mg | Week 8 | -1.23 | Standard Error 0.17 | units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Elagolix 250 mg | Week 8 | -0.94 | Standard Error 0.17 | units on a scale |
| Change From Baseline in the Monthly Peak Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for Endometriosis Pain | Placebo | Week 4 | -1.27 | Standard Error 0.32 | units on a scale |
1 to 10 of 239Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 239 results by groupParticipant flow30
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1 - 12 | STARTED | Placebo | 52 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | STARTED | Elagolix 150 mg | 51 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | STARTED | Elagolix 250 mg | 52 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | STARTED | Placebo / Elagolix 150 mg | 0 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | STARTED | Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg | 0 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | COMPLETED | Placebo | 38 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | COMPLETED | Elagolix 150 mg | 45 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | COMPLETED | Elagolix 250 mg | 42 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | COMPLETED | Placebo / Elagolix 150 mg | 0 | |
| Weeks 1 - 12 | COMPLETED | Placebo / Elagolix 250 mg | 0 |
1 to 10 of 30Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 30 participant flowAdverse events39
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | NAUSEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo | 1 | 52 | 1 |
| other | NAUSEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | Elagolix 150 mg | 6 | 69 | 7 |
| other | NAUSEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | Elagolix 250 mg | 6 | 72 | 6 |
| other | NASOPHARYNGITIS | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 3 | 52 | 3 |
| other | NASOPHARYNGITIS | Infections and infestations | Elagolix 150 mg | 2 | 69 | 4 |
| other | NASOPHARYNGITIS | Infections and infestations | Elagolix 250 mg | 3 | 72 | 4 |
| other | SINUSITIS | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 2 | 52 | 2 |
| other | SINUSITIS | Infections and infestations | Elagolix 150 mg | 6 | 69 | 6 |
| other | SINUSITIS | Infections and infestations | Elagolix 250 mg | 2 | 72 | 2 |
| other | UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION | Infections and infestations | Placebo | 3 | 52 | 3 |
1 to 10 of 39Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 39 adverse eventsAdverse event totals9
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | 0 | 52 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Elagolix 150 mg | 0 | 69 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Elagolix 250 mg | 0 | 72 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 18 | 52 |
| Total, other adverse events | Elagolix 150 mg | 31 | 69 |
| Total, other adverse events | Elagolix 250 mg | 33 | 72 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 0 | 52 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Elagolix 150 mg | 0 | 69 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Elagolix 250 mg | 1 | 72 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00619866
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00619866/registered?page=2