ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00620035

A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator (34530)(P05702)

NCT00620035, Phase 3, Completed, Organon and Co; results first posted 2011-10-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator (34530)(P05702). Trials, record NCT00620035. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00620035

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Insertion Characteristics of the Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant Using a Next Generation Applicator (34530)(P05702)
NCT number
NCT00620035
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
301 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Conditions
Contraception
Interventions
Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant
First posted
2008-02-21
Last updated
2022-02-04
Results first posted
2011-10-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical AspectsDay 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the Next Generation Applicator (NGA), the investigator/applicator user (AU) completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Design/technical aspects' consisted of five questions: fit of the applicator in the hand, size, weight, handling, and color of the applicator were assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
PrimaryPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: FunctionalityDay 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Functionality' consisted of six questions assessing functionality of the needle. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
PrimaryPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire by Domain: SafetyDay 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Safety' consisted of three questions: removal of the protection cap from applicator, full retraction of the needle into the applicator after insertion, difference in colors of the obturator \& the implant. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
PrimaryPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Used TimeDay 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Used Time' consisted of one question: insertion time was assessed. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
PrimaryPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Applicator SatisfactionDay 1
In order to evaluate efficacy and ease of use of the NGA, the investigator/AU completed a User Satisfaction Questionnaire on Day 1 after the 12th implant insertion. The domain, 'Applicator Satisfaction' consisted of one question in order to assess the applicator. The percentage of AUs who were very satisfied and satisfied was presented.
PrimaryImplant Insertion Time (Seconds)Day 1
The implant insertion time was the time expressed in seconds, from removal of the protection cap from the applicator until retraction of the needle from the arm after insertion. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.
PrimaryImplant Removal Time (Seconds)Day 1
The implant removal time was the time expressed in seconds, from making the removal incision until placing the butterfly closure. Data was presented for overall investigators including experienced and non-experienced.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical AspectsDay 1The Applicator User (AU) group consisted of all investigators participating in the trial and who performed at least one insertion.Percentage of Applicator UsersNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: FunctionalityDay 1The Applicator User (AU) group consisted of all investigators participating in the trial and who performed at least one insertion.Percentage of Applicator UsersNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire by Domain: SafetyDay 1The Applicator User (AU) group consisted of all investigators participating in the trial and who performed at least one insertion.Percentage of Applicator UsersNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Used TimeDay 1The Applicator User (AU) group consisted of all investigators participating in the trial and who performed at least one insertion.Percentage of Applicator UsersNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Applicator SatisfactionDay 1The Applicator User (AU) group consisted of all investigators participating in the trial and who performed at least one insertion.Percentage of Applicator UsersNUMBER
PRIMARYImplant Insertion Time (Seconds)Day 1All-Subjects-Treated (AST) group included all participants who had the Radiopaque implant inserted (N=301). Data was reported for 291 implant insertions.SecondsMEAN
PRIMARYImplant Removal Time (Seconds)Day 1All-Subjects-Treated (AST) group included all participants who had the Radiopaque implant inserted (N=301). Data was reported for 292 implant removals.SecondsMEAN

Results by group7

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Design & Technical AspectsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant99.1Percentage of Applicator Users
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: FunctionalityRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant94.9Percentage of Applicator Users
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire by Domain: SafetyRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant98.6Percentage of Applicator Users
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Used TimeRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant100Percentage of Applicator Users
Percentage of Applicator Users Who Were Very Satisfied and Satisfied- User Satisfaction Questionnaire for Domain: Applicator SatisfactionRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant100Percentage of Applicator Users
Implant Insertion Time (Seconds)Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant27.9Standard Deviation 29.3Seconds
Implant Removal Time (Seconds)Radiopaque Etonogestrel Implant119.3Standard Deviation 120.2Seconds

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant301
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant156
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant145

Adverse events33

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherImplant Site HaematomaGeneral disordersRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant1630116
otherImplant Site PainGeneral disordersRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant1830120
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant1930122
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant3230145
otherUpper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant2030130
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant2030131
otherVulvovaginal CandidiasisInfections and infestationsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant1930126
otherWeight IncreasedInvestigationsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant3530138
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant56301103
otherAmenorrhoeaReproductive system and breast disordersRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant2130123

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant
Total, other adverse eventsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant233301
Total, serious adverse eventsRadiopaque Etonogestrel Implant17301

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
22939402DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00620035

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00620035/events?page=2