ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00631969

Vardenafil ODT Versus Placebo in Males With Erectile Dysfunction

NCT00631969, Phase 3, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2011-01-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vardenafil ODT Versus Placebo in Males With Erectile Dysfunction. Trials, record NCT00631969. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00631969

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Vardenafil ODT Versus Placebo in Males With Erectile Dysfunction
NCT number
NCT00631969
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
362 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Erectile Dysfunction
Interventions
Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456), Placebo
First posted
2008-03-10
Last updated
2014-12-30
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2008-000536-40
Results first posted
2011-01-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFfrom baseline up to 12 weeks
The primary variable was the treatment group difference from baseline to Week 12 or Last observation carried forward (LOCF) of the least square mean difference in the IIEF-EF domain score (1-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: \<=10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; \>25 'no ED').
PrimaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
Sexual encounter profile (SEP) items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to penetrate the partner.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to maintain an erection after penetration.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Achieving "Back to Normal" Erectile Functionup to 12 weeks of treatment
Responders: percentage of subjects achieving an IIEF-EF score \> 25. The primary variable was the treatment group difference from baseline to Week 12 or Last observation carried forward (LOCF) of the least square mean difference in the IIEF-EF domain score (1-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: \<=10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; \>25 'no ED').
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to obtain successful erections.
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Satisfaction With the Hardness of Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to get satisfactory hardness of erections.
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Overall Satisfaction at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to overall satisfactory attempts.
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to have successful ejaculations.
SecondaryNumber of Sexual Attempts Till First Successful Attemptup to 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Ease With Erection at 12 Weeks or LOCFfrom baseline up to 12 weeks
Treatment group difference in points on the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS, 0-100 normalized ordinal scores, higher scores indicate greater levels of 'ease with erection', 'erectile functioning satisfaction', 'pleasure of sexual activity', 'satisfaction with orgasm', 'confidence for completion', and 'satisfaction with medication') domain "Ease with Erection" from baseline to Week 12 or LOCF expressed as the least square mean difference.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFfrom baseline up to 12 weeksThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.scores on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of successful penetrationsMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of success in maintenanceMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Achieving Back to Normal Erectile Functionup to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of successful erectionsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Satisfaction With the Hardness of Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of satisfactory erectionsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Overall Satisfaction at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of satisfactory attemptsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.percentage of ejaculation successesMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Sexual Attempts Till First Successful Attemptup to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.Sexual AttemptsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Ease With Erection at 12 Weeks or LOCFfrom baseline up to 12 weeksThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy data.scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group104

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)<65 years9.6Standard Deviation 6.28scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFPlacebo<65 years2.1Standard Deviation 7.33scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)≥65 years7.7Standard Deviation 8.19scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFPlacebo≥65 years0.9Standard Deviation 6.42scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)Total8.6Standard Deviation 7.40scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or LOCFPlaceboTotal1.4Standard Deviation 6.86scores on a scale
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration at 12 WeeksVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)<65 years35.8Standard Deviation 33.63percentage of successful penetrations
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration at 12 WeeksPlacebo<65 years5.5Standard Deviation 42.82percentage of successful penetrations
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration at 12 WeeksVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)≥65 years35.2Standard Deviation 38.06percentage of successful penetrations
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration at 12 WeeksPlacebo≥65 years8.7Standard Deviation 28.41percentage of successful penetrations

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)186
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo176
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)184
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentPlacebo174
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)171
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo155
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo21

Adverse events168

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)0184
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersPlacebo1174
otherBundle branch block leftCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)1184
otherBundle branch block leftCardiac disordersPlacebo1174
otherBundle branch block rightCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)0184
otherBundle branch block rightCardiac disordersPlacebo3174
otherMitral valve incompetenceCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)0184
otherMitral valve incompetenceCardiac disordersPlacebo1174
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)1184
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo1174

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)70184
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo36174
Total, serious adverse eventsVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456)4184
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1174

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20233275RESULTPubMed
20807322RESULTPubMed
20925442RESULTPubMed
21883954RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY 38-9456) vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00631969

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00631969/results?page=2