ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00633932

Reflux Esophagitis Phase III Study (Initial Treatment)

NCT00633932, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2010-04-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Reflux Esophagitis Phase III Study (Initial Treatment). Trials, record NCT00633932. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00633932

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Reflux Esophagitis Phase III Study (Initial Treatment)
NCT number
NCT00633932
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
602 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Reflux Esophagitis
Interventions
Esomeprazole, Esomeprazole, Omeprazole
First posted
2008-03-12
Last updated
2010-12-20
Results first posted
2010-04-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded "O" at Week 8 Out of Patients Who Were Graded "A, B, C or D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification".8 weeks
Los Angeles classification consists of 5 grades (Grade O, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, Grade D). The subjects who were definitely diagnosed to have RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D based on the EGD on Visit 1 were randomised. A subject classified into LA classification Grade O was considered no reflux esophagitis. The definitions of each grade are: Grade A (Mucosal break \< 5 mm in length), Grade B (Mucosal break \> 5mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between \> 2 mucosal folds) and Grade D (Mucosal break \>75% of esophageal circumference).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded "O" at Week 4 Out of Patients Who Were Graded "A, B, C or D" at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification4 weeks
Los Angeles classification consists of 5 grades (Grade O, Grade A, Grade B, Grade C and Grade D). The subjects who were definitely diagnosed to have RE classified into LA classification Grade A, B, C or D based on the EGD on Visit 1 were randomised. A subject classified into LA classification Grade O was considered no reflux esophagitis. The definitions of each grade are: Grade A (Mucosal break \< 5 mm in length), Grade B (Mucosal break \> 5mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between \> 2 mucosal folds) and Grade D (Mucosal break \>75% of esophageal circumference).

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 8 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification.8 weeksOne participant for each treatment group did not take any investigational product. These 3 participants were excluded (1 for each treatment group) from all the efficacy and safety analyses.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 4 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification4 weeksOne participant for each treatment group did not take any investigational product. These 3 participants were excluded (1 for each treatment group) from all the efficacy and safety analyses.participantsNUMBER

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 8 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification.Experimental: Esomeprazole 40mg171participants
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 8 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification.Experimental: Esomeprazole 20mg165participants
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 8 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles Classification.Comparator: Omeprazole 20mg166participants
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 4 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles ClassificationExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg141participants
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 4 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles ClassificationExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg147participants
Number of Participants With Healing of Reflux Esophagitis (RE) Who Were Graded O at Week 4 Out of Patients Who Were Graded A, B, C or D at Baseline According to Los Angeles ClassificationComparator: Omeprazole 20mg143participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg191
Overall StudySTARTEDExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg190
Overall StudySTARTEDComparator: Omeprazole 20mg191
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg179
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg176
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDComparator: Omeprazole 20mg180
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDComparator: Omeprazole 20mg11

Adverse events15

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg2190
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg3189
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersComparator: Omeprazole 20mg6190
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg10190
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg6189
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsComparator: Omeprazole 20mg10190
seriousBronchopneumoniaInfections and infestationsExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg0190
seriousBronchopneumoniaInfections and infestationsExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg1189
seriousBronchopneumoniaInfections and infestationsComparator: Omeprazole 20mg0190
seriousGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg0190

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg
Total, all-cause mortalityExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg
Total, all-cause mortalityComparator: Omeprazole 20mg
Total, other adverse eventsExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg12190
Total, other adverse eventsExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg9189
Total, other adverse eventsComparator: Omeprazole 20mg16190
Total, serious adverse eventsExperimental: Esomeprazole 40mg0190
Total, serious adverse eventsExperimental: Esomeprazole 20mg1189
Total, serious adverse eventsComparator: Omeprazole 20mg1190

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00633932

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00633932/registered