ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00645099

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to End Point in the Triglycerides (TG) to High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Ratio (TG:HDL Ratio)Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The primary end point analysis set consisted of 413 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and had baseline and post-baseline TG and HDL data. Data of patients with missing TG or HDL values or who started or changed lipid-lowering medication during the trial were excluded from analysis.
RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in TriglyceridesBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in High Density LipoproteinBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Total CholesterolBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Safety data were analyzed using the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set for safety and consisted of 459 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and provided any post-baseline safety data. Changes from baseline could only be calculated for patients with paired data.
mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Friedwald QT)Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Safety data were analyzed using the ITT analysis set for safety and consisted of 459 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and provided any post-baseline safety data. Changes from baseline could only be calculated for patients with paired data.
mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Converted InsulinBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Safety data were analyzed using the ITT analysis set for safety and consisted of 459 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and provided any post-baseline safety data. Changes from baseline could only be calculated for patients with paired data.
pmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Fasting GlucoseBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Safety data were analyzed using the ITT analysis set for safety and consisted of 459 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and provided any post-baseline safety data. Changes from baseline could only be calculated for patients with paired data.
mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-%B)Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
dimensionlessMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Homeastatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
dimensionlessMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Meeting the Criteria for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus During Follow-up6 months
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Onset of Impaired Glucose ToleranceBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement.Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Impaired Fasting GlucoseBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at End Point of the Insulinogenic IndexBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
pM/mMMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at End Point of Mari-Type Analysis of Glucose Sensitivity for InsulinBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
pM/mMMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at End Point in Body WeightBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Safety data were analyzed using the ITT analysis set for safety and consisted of 459 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and provided any post-baseline safety data. Changes from baseline could only be calculated for patients with paired data.
kgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at End Point in Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)kg/m²MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at End Point in Waist CircumferenceBaseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Safety data were analyzed using the ITT analysis set for safety and consisted of 459 patients, i.e., all patients who received study medication at least once and provided any post-baseline safety data. Changes from baseline could only be calculated for patients with paired data.
cmMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Patients First Meeting the NCEP/ATP III Criteria for Metabolic Syndrome During Follow-up6 months
The secondary endpoint analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. In this case, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients without metabolic syndrome at baseline.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End Point in Total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Score (PANSS)Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
The secondary endpoint analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.
points on a scaleMEAN

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00645099/outcomes