ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00655629

Vardenafil Orodispersible Tablet (ODT) Versus Placebo in Males With Erectile Dysfunction, 50% of Whom Are to be 65 Years or Older.

NCT00655629, Phase 3, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2011-01-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vardenafil Orodispersible Tablet (ODT) Versus Placebo in Males With Erectile Dysfunction, 50% of Whom Are to be 65 Years or Older. Trials, record NCT00655629. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00655629

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Vardenafil Orodispersible Tablet (ODT) Versus Placebo in Males With Erectile Dysfunction, 50% of Whom Are to be 65 Years or Older.
NCT number
NCT00655629
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
339 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Erectile Dysfunction
Interventions
Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456), Placebo
First posted
2008-04-10
Last updated
2014-08-01
Results first posted
2011-01-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)from baseline up to 12 weeks
The primary variable was the treatment group difference from baseline to Week 12 or LOCF of the least square mean difference in the IIEF-EF domain score (Range: 1-30 ordinal. Directionality: severity of erectile dysfunction: \<=10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; \>25 'no ED'.)
PrimaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2) at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP (Sexual Encounter Profile) items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to penetrate the partner.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to maintain an erection after penetration.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Achieving "Back to Normal" Erectile Functionup to 12 weeks of treatment
Responders: percentage of subjects achieving an IIEF-EF score \> 25. The primary variable was the treatment group difference from baseline to Week 12 or Last observation carried forward (LOCF) of the least square mean difference in the IIEF-EF domain score (1-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: \<=10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; \>25 'no ED').
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to obtain successful erections.
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Satisfaction With the Hardness of Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to get satisfactory hardness of erections.
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Overall Satisfaction at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to overall satisfactory attempts.
SecondaryChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatment
SEP items success rates are the percentage of all valid and successful intercourse attempts (items answered 'yes') in relation to all valid attempts. Here the SEP item refers to the ability to have successful ejaculations.
SecondaryNumber of Sexual Attempts Till First Successful Attemptup to 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Ease With Erection at 12 Weeks or LOCFfrom baseline up to 12 weeks
Treatment group difference in points on the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS: 0-100 normalized, ordinal; Directionality: Higher scores indicate greater levels of (i) ease with erection, (ii) erectile functioning satisfaction, (iii) pleasure of sexual activity, (iv) satisfaction with orgasm, (v) confidence for completion, and (vi) satisfaction with medication.) domain "Ease with Erection" from baseline to Week 12 or LOCF expressed as the least square mean difference.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)from baseline up to 12 weeksThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datascores on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2) at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of successful penetrationsMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of successful maintenanceMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Achieving Back to Normal Erectile Functionup to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of successful erectionsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Satisfaction With the Hardness of Erection at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of satisfactory erectionsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Overall Satisfaction at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of satisfactory attemptsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate at 12 Weeksfrom baseline up to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datapercentage of ejaculation successesMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Sexual Attempts Till First Successful Attemptup to 12 weeks of treatmentThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy dataSexual AttemptsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Ease With Erection at 12 Weeks or LOCFfrom baseline up to 12 weeksThe primary data set was the ITT (Intent-to treat) population defined as all randomized treated subjects with baseline and post-baseline efficacy datascores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group92

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)<65 years10.3Standard Deviation 7.78scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Placebo<65 years1.7Standard Deviation 6.28scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)>=65 years6.7Standard Deviation 8.06scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Placebo>=65 years1.1Standard Deviation 6.01scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)Total8.5Standard Deviation 8.11scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF Sub-Score) at 12 Weeks or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)PlaceboTotal1.4Standard Deviation 6.14scores on a scale
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2) at 12 WeeksVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)<65 years33.2Standard Deviation 33.27percentage of successful penetrations
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2) at 12 WeeksPlacebo<65 years4.6Standard Deviation 34.12percentage of successful penetrations
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2) at 12 WeeksVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)>=65 years27.3Standard Deviation 37.39percentage of successful penetrations
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2) at 12 WeeksPlacebo>=65 years3.0Standard Deviation 33.33percentage of successful penetrations

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)172
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo167
Overall StudyParticipants Received TreatmentVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)171
Overall StudyParticipants Received TreatmentPlacebo166
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)151
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo144
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)21
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo23

Adverse events180

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBundle branch blockCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)1171
otherBundle branch blockCardiac disordersPlacebo0166
otherBundle branch block rightCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)0171
otherBundle branch block rightCardiac disordersPlacebo1166
otherMitral valve incompetenceCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)1171
otherMitral valve incompetenceCardiac disordersPlacebo0166
otherSupraventricular extrasystolesCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)1171
otherSupraventricular extrasystolesCardiac disordersPlacebo1166
otherTricuspid valve incompetenceCardiac disordersVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)1171
otherTricuspid valve incompetenceCardiac disordersPlacebo0166

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)65171
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo37166
Total, serious adverse eventsVardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456)2171
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1166

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20456213RESULTPubMed
21883954RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Vardenafil ODT (STAXYN, BAY38-9456) vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00655629

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00655629/results?page=2