ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00667095

Over Active Bladder Instillation Study - Botox

NCT00667095, Phase 3, Terminated, Mayo Clinic; results first posted 2014-07-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Over Active Bladder Instillation Study - Botox. Trials, record NCT00667095. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00667095

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Over Active Bladder Instillation Study - Botox
NCT number
NCT00667095
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
25 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Conditions
Overactive Bladder, Urinary Urge Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Detrusor Hyperreflexia, Urge Incontinence
Interventions
Botox Instillation, DMSO Instillation
First posted
2008-04-25
Last updated
2014-07-11
Results first posted
2014-07-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) ScoreBaseline, 1 month, 3 months
The I-QoL measures the effect of urinary incontinence on quality of life. It is divided into 3 subscales: 1) avoidance and limiting behavior, 2) psychosocial impact, and 3) social embarrassment. The I-QOL is comprised of 22 items, each with the response scale from '1= Extremely' to '5= Not at all'. A mean score for each subscale is calculated (averaging the scores for the items in each subscale) as well as a total score for all 22 items (sum of all subscale scores). The scores are then transformed to a 'Scale score' ranging from 0-100 points for ease of interpretation: Scale score = (sum of the items - lowest possible score)/possible raw score range X 100. Higher scores indicate less impact of incontinence on quality of life.
SecondaryChange in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)baseline, 1 month, 3 months
The IIQ-7 measures the effect of urinary incontinence on quality of life. It is comprised of 7 items, each with the response scale from "0=Not at all" to "3=Greatly." The scores can range from 0 to 21; a low score indicates less impact of incontinence on quality of life.
SecondaryChange in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form Score (ICIQ-SF)baseline, 1 month, 3 months
The ICIQ-SF provides a brief and robust measure to assess the impact of symptoms of incontinence on quality of life and outcome of treatment. The questionnaire has 4 items and the score can range from 0 to 21, with greater values indicating increased severity of symptoms and lower quality of life.
SecondaryChange in Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)baseline, 1 month, 3 months
The UDI-6 measures the effect of urinary incontinence on quality of life. It consists of 6 items, each with the response scale from "0=Not at all" to "3=Greatly." The scores can range from 0 to 18; a low score indicates less impact of incontinence on quality of life.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Decrease in Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month and 3 Monthsbaseline, 1 month, 3 months
The Blaivas-Groutz Anti-incontinence scale was used as a measure of urinary incontinence. This scale combines information on the number of incontinent episodes in a 24-hour period, 24-hour pad weights, and a qualitative rating by the patient into a single score ranging from 0 to 6. this score is then used to categorize incontinence as none (0), mild (1-2), moderate (3-4), or severe (5-6).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Urinary Urgency at 1 Month and 3 MonthsBaseline, 1 month, 3 months
Urinary urgency was measured by the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS). The IUSS asks patients to assess the severity of 'urgency' at each void. The scale employs the following wording: "Degree of urgency is meant to describe your urge to urinate. Sometimes you may feel a very strong urge to urinate and at other times, you may feel a milder urge prior to the onset of a toilet void. Rate this feeling by circling 0, 1, 2, or 3, defined as: 0: NONE - no urgency, 1: MILD - awareness of urgency, but it is easily tolerated and you can continue with your usual activity or tasks, 2: MODERATE - enough urgency discomfort that it interferes with or shortens your usual activity or tasks, 3: SEVERE - extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stops all activity or tasks."

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) ScoreBaseline, 1 month, 3 months
Analysis was done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. The sample size was reduced to 9 in the Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) instillation arm at 3 months due to withdrawal for reasons unrelated to study (cancer).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Analysis was done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. The sample size was reduced to 9 in the Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DSMO) instillation arm at 3 months due to withdrawal for reasons unrelated to study (cancer).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form Score (ICIQ-SF)baseline, 1 month, 3 monthsAnalysis was done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. The sample size was reduced to 9 in the DSMO instillation arm at 3 months due to withdrawal for reasons unrelated to study (cancer).units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)baseline, 1 month, 3 monthsAnalysis was done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. The sample size was reduced to 9 in the DSMO instillation arm at 3 months due to withdrawal for reasons unrelated to study (cancer).units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Decrease in Blaivas-Groutz Anti-Incontinence Score at 1 Month and 3 Monthsbaseline, 1 month, 3 monthsAnalysis was done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. The sample size was reduced to 9 in the DSMO instillation arm at 3 months due to withdrawal for reasons unrelated to study (cancer).participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Urinary Urgency at 1 Month and 3 MonthsBaseline, 1 month, 3 monthsAnalysis was done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. The sample size was reduced to 9 in the DSMO instillation arm at 3 months due to withdrawal for reasons unrelated to study (cancer).participantsNUMBER

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) ScoreBotox and DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 1 month9.6Standard Deviation 13.3units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) ScoreDMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 1 month-3.9Standard Deviation 11.6units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) ScoreBotox and DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 3 months (n=11, 9)8.6Standard Deviation 14.4units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) ScoreDMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 3 months (n=11, 9)-4.0Standard Deviation 9.3units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)Botox and DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 1 month-2.5Standard Deviation 4.0units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 1 month2.0Standard Deviation 5.9units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)Botox and DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 3 months (n=11, 9)-1.8Standard Deviation 4.2units on a scale
Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 3 months (n=11, 9)1.1Standard Deviation 3.8units on a scale
Change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form Score (ICIQ-SF)Botox and DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 1 month-2.4Standard Deviation 5.8units on a scale
Change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form Score (ICIQ-SF)DMSO InstillationChange from baseline to 1 month-0.5Standard Deviation 4.4units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBotox and DMSO Instillation11
Overall StudySTARTEDDMSO Instillation10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBotox and DMSO Instillation11
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDMSO Instillation9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBotox and DMSO Instillation0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDMSO Instillation1

Adverse events22

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsBotox and DMSO Instillation3114
otherUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsDMSO Instillation5106
otherHigh Blood PressueCardiac disordersBotox and DMSO Instillation1111
otherHigh Blood PressueCardiac disordersDMSO Instillation0100
otherRashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBotox and DMSO Instillation1111
otherRashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersDMSO Instillation0100
otherHad fall, unable to walkInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsBotox and DMSO Instillation1111
otherHad fall, unable to walkInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDMSO Instillation0100
otherBladder spasms after instillationRenal and urinary disordersBotox and DMSO Instillation0110
otherBladder spasms after instillationRenal and urinary disordersDMSO Instillation1101

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBotox and DMSO Instillation
Total, all-cause mortalityDMSO Instillation
Total, other adverse eventsBotox and DMSO Instillation611
Total, other adverse eventsDMSO Instillation710
Total, serious adverse eventsBotox and DMSO Instillation011
Total, serious adverse eventsDMSO Instillation210

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
19648387BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Botox and DMSO Instillation vs DMSO Instillation: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00667095

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00667095/results?page=2