ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00668525

Escitalopram in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

NCT00668525, Phase 3, Completed, Forest Laboratories; results first posted 2010-05-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Escitalopram in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Trials, record NCT00668525. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00668525

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Escitalopram in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
NCT number
NCT00668525
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
877 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Forest Laboratories
Conditions
Major Depressive Disorder
Interventions
Escitalopram, Placebo, Escitalopram
First posted
2008-04-29
Last updated
2010-05-11
Results first posted
2010-05-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.Change from baseline in MADRS total score at week 8
The MADRS is a 10-item clinician-rated scale that was used to assess depressive symptomatology over the patient's prior week. Patients were rated on 10 items designed to assess feelings of sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty concentrating, and lack of interest. Each item was scored on a 7-point Likert scale; a score of 0 indicated the absence of symptoms, and a score of 6 indicated symptoms of maximum severity. The total score range is 0 to 60 (higher score indicates a greater severity of symptoms).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8Change from baseline in HAM-D at week 8
The HAMD is a clinician-rated 24-item scale was used to rate the patient's depressive state. It was also used to identify obsessive-compulsive, genital, and somatic symptoms, as well as diurnal variation in the presence of symptoms. Each item was scored on a 3, 4 or 5-point Likert scale. A score of 0 indicated the absence of symptoms, and a score of 2, 3 or 4 indicated symptoms of maximum severity. The total score range is 0 to 74 (higher score indicates a greater depressive state).

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.Change from baseline in MADRS total score at week 8
The analysis was performed on the intent to treat population based on the LOCF approach using an ANCOVA model with treatment group and study center as factors and the baseline MADRS total score as a covariate.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8Change from baseline in HAM-D at week 8
The analysis was performed on the intent to treat population based on the LOCF approach using an ANCOVA model with treatment group and study center as factors and the baseline HAMD total score as a covariate.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.Escitalopram Low Dose-12.8Standard Error 0.6Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.Escitalopram High Dose-13.4Standard Error 0.6Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Total Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at 8 Weeks.Placebo-10.1Standard Error 0.7Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8Escitalopram Low Dose-11.5Standard Error 0.5Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8Escitalopram High Dose-11.6Standard Error 0.6Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamiltion Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at Week 8Placebo-8.5Standard Error 0.6Units on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEscitalopram Low Dose325
Overall StudySTARTEDEscitalopram High Dose332
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo220
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEscitalopram Low Dose248
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEscitalopram High Dose239
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo167
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEscitalopram Low Dose77
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEscitalopram High Dose93
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo53

Adverse events63

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersEscitalopram Low Dose52322
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersEscitalopram High Dose45324
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo31218
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEscitalopram Low Dose41322
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEscitalopram High Dose37324
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo16218
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersEscitalopram Low Dose30322
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersEscitalopram High Dose35324
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo14218
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersEscitalopram Low Dose19322

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEscitalopram Low Dose
Total, all-cause mortalityEscitalopram High Dose
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsEscitalopram Low Dose146322
Total, other adverse eventsEscitalopram High Dose160324
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo74218
Total, serious adverse eventsEscitalopram Low Dose3322
Total, serious adverse eventsEscitalopram High Dose7324
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo4218

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00668525

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00668525/events?page=2