ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00674973

A Biomarker Identification Trial of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

NCT00674973, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-04-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Biomarker Identification Trial of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Trials, record NCT00674973. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00674973

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Biomarker Identification Trial of Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
NCT number
NCT00674973
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
207 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Pancreatic Cancer
Interventions
Erlotinib, Placebo
First posted
2008-05-08
Last updated
2016-06-17
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2007-003738-40
Results first posted
2016-04-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-Free SurvivalFrom the time of randomization until progression of disease or death (up to 30 months)
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first occurrence of PD or death whichever occurred first. Participants without event were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response RateFrom the time of randomization until progression of disease or death (up to 30 months)
Response rate was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0 criteria, for at least 4 weeks at any time during randomized treatment (confirmed response). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 20 December 2010 (up to 30 months)
Disease control rates (DCR) were measured according to RECIST Version 1.0 criteria. Disease control was defined as being a responder or as having stable disease for at least 6 weeks post-randomization. Stable disease was defined as having neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalFrom the time of randomization until or death (up to 30 months)Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug (up to 30 months)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who was administered a study treatment, regardless of whether or not the event had a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE, therefore, could be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study treatment, whether or not related to the treatment.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-Free SurvivalFrom the time of randomization until progression of disease or death (up to 30 months)The Full-Analysis Set (FAS) was defined as all randomized patients. Participants were presented according to the therapy that they were randomized to receive.weeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Best Overall Response RateFrom the time of randomization until progression of disease or death (up to 30 months)The FAS was defined as all randomized patients. Participants were presented according to the therapy that they were randomized to receive.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 20 December 2010 (up to 30 months)The FAS was defined as all randomized patients. Participants were presented according to the therapy that they were randomized to receive.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalFrom the time of randomization until or death (up to 30 months)The FAS was defined as all randomized patients. Participants were presented according to the therapy that they were randomized to receive.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug (up to 30 months)Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a safety follow-up, whether withdrawn prematurely or not, were included in the safety population.participantsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-Free SurvivalPlacebo5.995% Confidence Interval 5.4 to 6.1weeks
Progression-Free SurvivalErlotinib6.195% Confidence Interval 5.9 to 6.4weeks
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response RatePlaceboCR095% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 3.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response RateErlotinibCR095% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 3.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response RatePlaceboPR495% Confidence Interval 1.1 to 9.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response RateErlotinibPR195% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 5.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)Placebo1995% Confidence Interval 11.5 to 27.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)Erlotinib2995% Confidence Interval 19.5 to 37.5percentage of participants
Overall SurvivalPlacebo3.195% Confidence Interval 2.1 to 4.3months
Overall SurvivalErlotinib4.095% Confidence Interval 2.8 to 4.8months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo103
Overall StudySTARTEDErlotinib104
Overall StudySwitch to Open-Label ErlotinibPlacebo57
Overall StudySwitch to Open-Label ErlotinibErlotinib0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDErlotinib2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo100
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDErlotinib102

Adverse events120

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo23103
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib25104
otherVOMITINGGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo21103
otherVOMITINGGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib13104
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo10103
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib22104
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo15103
otherABDOMINAL PAINGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib16104
otherCONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo17103
otherCONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib8104

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityErlotinib
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo70103
Total, other adverse eventsErlotinib81104
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo11103
Total, serious adverse eventsErlotinib21104

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
24827134DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Erlotinib vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Trial comparisons
Erlotinib vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00674973

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00674973/events?page=2