ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00675909

Improving Sedation of Children Undergoing Procedures in the Emergency Department

NCT00675909, Not applicable, Completed, Seattle Children's Hospital; results first posted 2012-06-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Improving Sedation of Children Undergoing Procedures in the Emergency Department. Trials, record NCT00675909. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00675909

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Improving Sedation of Children Undergoing Procedures in the Emergency Department
NCT number
NCT00675909
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
180 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Seattle Children's Hospital
Conditions
Anxiety
Interventions
Aerosolized Intranasal midazolam, Aerosolized Buccal Midazolam, Oral midazolam
First posted
2008-05-12
Last updated
2018-11-09
Results first posted
2012-06-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in CHEOPS Score Measured Level of Sedation From Baseline (Presentation in ED, Before Sedation) to Start of Procedure (Laceration Repair).Baseline (presentation, before sedation) in ED to start of procedure (laceration repair).
Modified CHEOPS (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale)assessment used to score sedation. Scale range is 0-10 with 0 meaning no pain and 4 or greater meaning pain. Scale is determined by assessing Facial Expression (0-2), Cry (0-3), Child Verbal (0-2) and Movements (0-3).
SecondaryTime From Study Drug Administration to Start of ProcedureTime from study drug administration to start of procedure up to 68 minutes
SecondaryDuration of ProcedureDuration of procedure up to 40 minutes
SecondaryPhysician Rating of SedationPhysician was asked after the procedure was done about their impression of sedation.Range is 0-10. Higher is associated with physician impression that sedation is better.
SecondaryNurse Rating of SedationAfter the procedure nurse was asked about their impression of the level of sedation.Range is 0-10. Higher is associated with nurse impression that sedation is better.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in CHEOPS Score Measured Level of Sedation From Baseline (Presentation in ED, Before Sedation) to Start of Procedure (Laceration Repair).Baseline (presentation, before sedation) in ED to start of procedure (laceration repair).Intention to treatScores on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime From Study Drug Administration to Start of ProcedureTime from study drug administration to start of procedure up to 68 minutesminutesMEDIAN
SECONDARYDuration of ProcedureDuration of procedure up to 40 minutesminutesMEDIAN
SECONDARYPhysician Rating of SedationPhysician was asked after the procedure was done about their impression of sedation.units on a scaleMEDIAN
SECONDARYNurse Rating of SedationAfter the procedure nurse was asked about their impression of the level of sedation.units on a scaleMEDIAN

Results by group15

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in CHEOPS Score Measured Level of Sedation From Baseline (Presentation in ED, Before Sedation) to Start of Procedure (Laceration Repair).Oral Midazolam295% Confidence Interval -2 to 7Scores on a scale
Change in CHEOPS Score Measured Level of Sedation From Baseline (Presentation in ED, Before Sedation) to Start of Procedure (Laceration Repair).Intranasal Midazolam295% Confidence Interval -3 to 7Scores on a scale
Change in CHEOPS Score Measured Level of Sedation From Baseline (Presentation in ED, Before Sedation) to Start of Procedure (Laceration Repair).Buccal Midazolam195% Confidence Interval -6 to 6Scores on a scale
Time From Study Drug Administration to Start of ProcedureOral Midazolam34Full Range 11 to 68minutes
Time From Study Drug Administration to Start of ProcedureIntranasal Midazolam28Full Range 5 to 60minutes
Time From Study Drug Administration to Start of ProcedureBuccal Midazolam32Full Range 10 to 59minutes
Duration of ProcedureOral Midazolam12Full Range 1 to 40minutes
Duration of ProcedureIntranasal Midazolam12Full Range 1 to 40minutes
Duration of ProcedureBuccal Midazolam10Full Range 1 to 39minutes
Physician Rating of SedationOral Midazolam6.7Full Range 0 to 10units on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOral Midazolam60
Overall StudySTARTEDBuccal Midazolam60
Overall StudySTARTEDIntranasal Midazolam60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOral Midazolam60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBuccal Midazolam60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntranasal Midazolam60
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOral Midazolam0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBuccal Midazolam0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntranasal Midazolam0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOral Midazolam
Total, all-cause mortalityBuccal Midazolam
Total, all-cause mortalityIntranasal Midazolam
Total, other adverse eventsOral Midazolam060
Total, other adverse eventsBuccal Midazolam060
Total, other adverse eventsIntranasal Midazolam060
Total, serious adverse eventsOral Midazolam060
Total, serious adverse eventsBuccal Midazolam060
Total, serious adverse eventsIntranasal Midazolam060

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
21689865RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00675909

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00675909/registered