ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00676143

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bapineuzumab in Alzheimer Disease Patients

NCT00676143, Phase 3, Terminated, Pfizer; results first posted 2016-06-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bapineuzumab in Alzheimer Disease Patients. Trials, record NCT00676143. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00676143

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bapineuzumab in Alzheimer Disease Patients
NCT number
NCT00676143
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,100 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Alzheimer Disease
Interventions
bapineuzumab, placebo
First posted
2008-05-12
Last updated
2016-06-10
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2007-005995-14
Results first posted
2016-06-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 weeks
The ADAS-Cog is a multi-item, objective measure of cognitive function. The scale evaluates memory, language, and praxis with items such as orientation, word recall, word recognition, object identification, comprehension, and the completion of simple tasks. Analysis of the ADAS-Cog for this study was based upon an 11 item score from the following items 1) word recall task, 2) naming objects and fingers, 3) following commands, 4) constructional praxis, 5) ideational praxis, 6) orientation, 7) word recognition, 8) remembering test instructions, 9) spoken language ability, 10) word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and 11) comprehension. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified psychometric rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced. The ADAS-Cog/11 ranged from 0 to 70 points, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in cognitive impairment.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 weeks
The DAD measures instrumental and basic activities of daily living in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The DAD is administered to the participants'caregiver in the form of an interview. This scale had to be administered by a trained and certified psychometric rater who did not have access to any information regarding adverse events experienced by the participant. This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item can be scored as 1 = yes, 0 = no, non applicable = NA. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. Higher scores indicate better function; a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71Baseline and 71 weeks
Brain amyloid burden as imaged by 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) positron emission tomography (PET). The latter is a semi-quantitative measure of the extent of fibrillar amyloid in the brain. PIB PET measurements were made in cortical regions found to have the highest burden of fibrillar amyloid at autopsy in participants diagnosed as having Alzheimer's pathology, and also regions reported to have the highest average retention of PIB signal in previous PET studies enrolling participants with probable AD. This parameter reflects overall brain amyloid deposition as indexed by imaging. The change from baseline was measured as average standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) in prespecified regions of interest (ROI) assessed by PIB PET imaging in a subset of participants.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71Baseline and 71 Weeks
Biomarkers CSF phospho-tau is an indicator of neuronal injury and neurodegeneration. An elevation in levels of tau, as well as specific p-tau species, is thought to be a marker for progressive cellular degeneration in AD. Accordingly, a reduction from baseline in levels of CSF tau in participants who received bapineuzumab compared with participants who received placebo may be indicative of a reduction in neuronal loss in participants treated with bapineuzumab.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71Baseline and 71 Weeks
Cerebral atrophy correlates closely with the gradual cognitive decline in AD and can be visualized by MRI. The BBSI technique involves positional matching of serial 3-dimensional MRI brain images, such that brain MRI-image volumes were first registered and then subtracted from each other. Atrophy rates would generally be expected to be lower if the underlying disease was attenuated by effective treatment.
SecondaryDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39 to Week 78
Treatment differences are estimated using least-squares (LS) means with factor levels weighted according to overall analysis population proportions. ADAS-Cog/11 total score range is 0 (least impairment) to 70 (most impairment); a negative treatment difference (bapineuzumab minus placebo) favors bapineuzumab. Within the MMRMs for ADAS-Cog/11 described for the primary analyses, linear contrasts were formed to test increasing trend of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo from Week 39 (the 9-month visit) through Week 78 (the 18 -month visit) for each variable, which is equivalent to testing a positive slope of the differences between each bapineuzumab dose group and placebo from Week 39 through Week 78. Results are from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for MMRM.
SecondaryDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39 to Week 78
Treatment differences are estimated using least-squares (LS) means with factor levels weighted according to overall analysis population proportions. DAD total score range is 0 to 100; a positive treatment difference (bapineuzumab minus placebo) favors bapineuzumab. Within the MMRMs for ADAS-Cog/11 described for the primary analyses, linear contrasts were formed to test increasing trend of the differences between bapineuzumab and placebo from Week 39 (the 9-month visit) through Week 78 (the 18 -month visit) for each variable, which is equivalent to testing a positive slope of the differences between each bapineuzumab dose group and placebo from Week 39 through Week 78. Results are from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model for MMRM.
SecondaryTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 Weeks
The time to first median placebo deterioration, defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score greater than or equal to the median worsening observed at Week 78 in the placebo group. The Kaplan Meier estimate of median time to first median placebo deterioration was presented.
SecondaryTime to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 WeeksThe time to first clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced an increase (worsening) from baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 total score of \>=7.
SecondaryTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 Weeks
The time to first median placebo deterioration was defined as the first time a participant experienced a decrease (worsening) in DAD total score greater than or equal to the median worsening at Week 78 in the placebo group.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 weeks
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) total score.
Unit on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78Baseline and 78 weeks
The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
Unit on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71Baseline and 71 weeks
PIB PET population included all randomized participants who enrolled in the PET substudies and who met the following criteria: a) received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug, b) had a baseline and at least one postbaseline PIB PET assessment, and c) had an SUVr for the global cortical average (GCA) ROI ≥1.35 at baseline.
standard uptake value ratioLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71Baseline and 71 Weeks
CSF population included all randomized participants who enrolled in the CSF substudies, received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug, and had a baseline and at least one postbaseline CSF measurement (CSF phospho-tau).
pg/mLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71Baseline and 71 Weeks
vMRI population included all randomized participants who enrolled in the vMRI substudies, received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug, and had a baseline and at least one postbaseline vMRI that passed quality control and was satisfactory for volumetric analysis.
Milliliter (mL)/yearLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDivergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39 to Week 78
The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
Units/YearLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDivergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78Week 39 to Week 78
The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
Units/YearLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 Weeks
The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 Weeks
The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)Baseline and 78 Weeks
The mITT included all randomized participants who received at least one infusion or portion of an infusion of study drug and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the ADAS-Cog/11 total score and DAD total score.
DaysMEDIAN

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78Placebo7.31Standard Error 0.47Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78Bapineuzumab7.32Standard Error 0.39Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78Placebo-14.94Standard Deviation 1.00Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78Bapineuzumab-14.89Standard Deviation 0.84Unit on a scale
Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71Placebo0.03Standard Error 0.04standard uptake value ratio
Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71Bapineuzumab-0.04Standard Error 0.03standard uptake value ratio
Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71Placebo0.83Standard Error 2.04pg/mL
Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71Bapineuzumab-0.55Standard Error 1.84pg/mL
Change From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71Placebo17.64Standard Error 0.69Milliliter (mL)/year
Change From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71Bapineuzumab17.51Standard Error 0.56Milliliter (mL)/year

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo441
Overall StudySTARTEDBapineuzumab658
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo439
Overall StudyTreatedBapineuzumab654
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo285
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBapineuzumab398
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo156
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBapineuzumab260

Adverse events392

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo2343930
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersBapineuzumab3465438
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo3443940
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsBapineuzumab4565466
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo2443937
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsBapineuzumab3065434
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPlacebo2743936
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsBapineuzumab3965447
otherCerebral microhaemorrhageNervous system disordersPlacebo1643938
otherCerebral microhaemorrhageNervous system disordersBapineuzumab76654218

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityBapineuzumab
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo198439
Total, other adverse eventsBapineuzumab298654
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo77439
Total, serious adverse eventsBapineuzumab137654

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26297092DERIVEDPubMed
27176461DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Bapineuzumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00676143

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00676143/results?page=2