ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00677833

Azithromycin Plus Chloroquine Versus Artemether-Lumefantrine For The Treatment Of Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria In Children In Africa

NCT00677833, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2014-06-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Azithromycin Plus Chloroquine Versus Artemether-Lumefantrine For The Treatment Of Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria In Children In Africa. Trials, record NCT00677833. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00677833

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Azithromycin Plus Chloroquine Versus Artemether-Lumefantrine For The Treatment Of Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria In Children In Africa
NCT number
NCT00677833
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
361 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Malaria, Falciparum
Interventions
Azithromycin plus Chloroquine, Artemether-lumefantrine
First posted
2008-05-15
Last updated
2014-06-26
Results first posted
2014-06-26
Limitations and caveats
Cohort 1 was a screening cohort, meant for safety evaluation, but not included in the efficacy assessments.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitologic Response (ACPR) at Day 28 in the Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) PopulationDay 28
ACPR (PCR-corrected) was defined as asexual Plasmodium falciparum (P.falciparum) parasitologic clearance at Day 28 irrespective of axillary, oral, rectal, or tympanic temperature, without previously meeting the criteria of Early Treatment Failure (ETF) (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) or PCR-corrected Late Treatment Failure (LTF) (which includes PCR-corrected Late Clinical Failures \[LCF\] - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 9 and 10, and PCR-corrected Late Parasitologic Failures (LPF)- see measure description in secondary outcome measure 11 and 12). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR at Day 28 in Per-Protocol (PP) PopulationDay 28
ACPR (PCR-corrected) was defined as asexual P.falciparum parasitologic clearance at Day 28 irrespective of axillary, oral, rectal, or tympanic temperature, without previously meeting the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) or PCR-corrected LTF (which includes PCR-corrected LCF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 9 and 10, and PCR-corrected LPF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 11 and 12). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 35, 42
ACPR (PCR-corrected) was defined as asexual P.falciparum parasitologic clearance on Days 7, 14, 21, 35, 42 irrespective of axillary, oral, rectal, or tympanic temperature, without previously meeting the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) or PCR-corrected LTF (which includes PCR-Corrected LCF- see measure description in secondary outcome measure 9 and 10, and PCR-corrected LPF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 11 and 12). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in PP PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 35, 42
ACPR (PCR-corrected) was defined as asexual P.falciparum parasitologic clearance on Days 7, 14, 21, 35, 42 irrespective of axillary, oral, rectal, or tympanic temperature, without previously meeting the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) or PCR-corrected LTF (which includes PCR-corrected LCF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 9 and 10, and PCR-corrected LPF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 11 and 12). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PCR-uncorrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
ACPR (PCR-uncorrected) was defined as asexual P.falciparum parasitologic clearance on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 irrespective of axillary, oral, rectal, or tympanic temperature, without previously meeting the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) or PCR-uncorrected LTF (which includes PCR-uncorrected LCF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 9 and 10, and PCR-uncorrected LPF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 11 and 12). PCR-uncorrected: not adjusted for molecular testing which determined recrudescence or true failures from reinfection.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PCR-uncorrected ACPR in PP PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
ACPR (PCR-uncorrected) was defined as asexual P.falciparum parasitologic clearance on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 irrespective of axillary, oral, rectal, or tympanic temperature, without previously meeting the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) or PCR-uncorrected LTF (which includes PCR-uncorrected LCF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 9 and 10, and PCR-uncorrected LPF - see measure description in secondary outcome measure 11 and 12). PCR-uncorrected: not adjusted for molecular testing which determined recrudescence or true failures from reinfection.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Early Treatment Failure (ETF) in the mITT Population (PCR-corrected)Day 0 up to Day 3
ETF defined as participants who met the following criteria: 1. Developed signs of severe malaria or clinical deterioration that required rescue medication on Days 0, 1, 2 or 3, in the presence of P. falciparum parasitemia 2. Last available asexual P. falciparum parasite count on Day 2 greater than the first available parasite count on Day 0 (Baseline), irrespective of axillary, oral or rectal temperature. 3. Parasitemia (P. falciparum) on Day 3 with fever or 4. Last available P. falciparum parasite count on Day 3 \>=25% of the first available parasite count on Day 0 (Baseline). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ETF in PP Population (PCR-corrected)Day 0 up to Day 3
ETF defined as participants who met the following criteria: 1. Developed signs of severe malaria or clinical deterioration that required rescue medication on Days 0, 1, 2 or 3, in the presence of P.falciparum parasitemia 2. Last available asexual P.falciparum parasite count on Day 2 greater than the first available parasite count on Day 0 (Baseline), irrespective of axillary, oral or rectal temperature. 3. Parasitemia (P.falciparum) on Day 3 with fever or 4. Last available P.falciparum parasite count on Day 3 \>=25% of the first available parasite count on Day 0 (Baseline). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Late Clinical Failure (LCF) in the mITT Population (PCR-corrected)Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
LCF included participants who met any of the following criteria: 1. Development of signs of severe malaria or clinical deterioration requiring rescue medication after Day 3 in the presence of P.falciparum parasitemia, without previously meeting any of the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) 2. Presence of P.falciparum parasitemia and fever on any day from Day 4 onward, without previously meeting any of the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With LCF in PP Population (PCR-corrected)Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42
LCF included participants who met any of the following criteria: 1. Development of signs of severe malaria or clinical deterioration requiring rescue medication after Day 3 in the presence of P.falciparum parasitemia, without previously meeting any of the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8) 2. Presence of P.falciparum parasitemia and fever on any day from Day 4 onward, without previously meeting any of the criteria of ETF (see measure description in secondary outcome measures 7 and 8). PCR-corrected refers to the use of molecular testing to differentiate recrudescence from reinfection in the context of an efficacy evaluation.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitologic Response (ACPR) at Day 28 in the Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) PopulationDay 28
mITT:treated participants who met disease criteria(blood smears positive for P.falciparum monoinfection;asexual parasitemia=1000-100,000 parasites/microliter \[mcL\];fever/history of fever \>=38 degree Celsius\[C\] \[rectal\],37.2 degree C \[axillary\] or \>=37.5 degree C \[oral\] within last 24 hours).Participants in Ivory Coast center excluded from analysis.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR at Day 28 in Per-Protocol (PP) PopulationDay 28
Per-Protocol (PP) population was a subset of the mITT population, who received all 3 days of study medication to which they were assigned. For ACPR efficacy endpoints, participants in Ivory Coast center excluded from PP population.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 35, 42mITT population. For ACPR efficacy endpoints, participants in Ivory Coast center excluded from mITT population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in PP PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 35, 42PP population. For ACPR efficacy endpoints, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from the PP population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PCR-uncorrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42mITT population. For ACPR efficacy endpoints, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from mITT population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PCR-uncorrected ACPR in PP PopulationDays 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42PP population. For ACPR efficacy endpoints, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from the PP population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Early Treatment Failure (ETF) in the mITT Population (PCR-corrected)Day 0 up to Day 3mITT population, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from mITT population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With ETF in PP Population (PCR-corrected)Day 0 up to Day 3PP population, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from the PP population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Late Clinical Failure (LCF) in the mITT Population (PCR-corrected)Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42mITT population, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from mITT population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With LCF in PP Population (PCR-corrected)Days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42PP population, participants in Ivory Coast center were excluded from the PP population.Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group138

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitologic Response (ACPR) at Day 28 in the Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) PopulationCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine89.2795% Confidence Interval 82.77 to 95.77Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitologic Response (ACPR) at Day 28 in the Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) PopulationCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine98.3795% Confidence Interval 95.59 to 100.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR at Day 28 in Per-Protocol (PP) PopulationCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine93.0895% Confidence Interval 87.32 to 98.84Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR at Day 28 in Per-Protocol (PP) PopulationCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine99.1695% Confidence Interval 96.97 to 100.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationCohort 2: Azithromycin + ChloroquineDay 794.1795% Confidence Interval 89.55 to 98.78Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationCohort 2: Artemether + LumefantrineDay 799.2195% Confidence Interval 97.25 to 100.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationCohort 2: Azithromycin + ChloroquineDay 1492.4795% Confidence Interval 87.30 to 97.64Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationCohort 2: Artemether + LumefantrineDay 1499.2195% Confidence Interval 97.24 to 100.00Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationCohort 2: Azithromycin + ChloroquineDay 2191.5995% Confidence Interval 86.04 to 97.14Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PCR-corrected ACPR in the mITT PopulationCohort 2: Artemether + LumefantrineDay 2198.3795% Confidence Interval 95.65 to 100.00Percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine55
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine51
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine124
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine131
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine122
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine128
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine0

Adverse events408

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine055
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine151
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine2124
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine4131
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine055
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine151
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine1124
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine0131
otherSplenomegalyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine055
otherSplenomegalyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine351

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine4055
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine3651
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 2: Azithromycin + Chloroquine103124
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 2: Artemether + Lumefantrine99131
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort 1: Azithromycin + Chloroquine155
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort 1: Artemether + Lumefantrine251

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25881046DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00677833

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00677833/registered?page=2