ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00678535

Erbitux in Combination With Xeloda and Cisplatin in Advanced Esophago-gastric Cancer

NCT00678535, Phase 3, Completed, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; results first posted 2013-05-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Erbitux in Combination With Xeloda and Cisplatin in Advanced Esophago-gastric Cancer. Trials, record NCT00678535. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00678535

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Erbitux in Combination With Xeloda and Cisplatin in Advanced Esophago-gastric Cancer
NCT number
NCT00678535
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
904 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Interventions
Cetuximab, Capecitabine, Cisplatin
First posted
2008-05-15
Last updated
2014-07-21
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2007-004219-75
Results first posted
2013-05-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) Time: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsTime from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)
The PFS time is defined as the duration from randomization to either first observation of progressive disease (PD) or occurrence of death due to any cause within 60 days of the last tumor assessment or randomization. Participants without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012)
The OS time is defined as the time from randomization to death or last day known to be alive. Participants without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier.
SecondaryBest Overall Response (BOR) Rate: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsEvery 6 weeks until progression, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012)
The BOR rate is defined as the percentage of participants having achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as the best overall response, based on radiological assessments (based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors \[RECIST\] Version 1.0) from the IRC.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)
Mean global health status and social functioning scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a better QoL.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed by EuroQol 5Dimensions (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)
EQ-5D questionnaire is a measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 5 single items are combined to obtain a single index score that is health utility index (HUI) score reflecting subject's preferences for different health states. The lowest possible score is -0.59 and the highest is 1.00, higher scores on the EQ-5D represent a better QoL.
SecondarySafety - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Time from first dose up to Day 30 after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to Baseline during a clinical study with an investigational medicinal product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) Time: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsTime from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized to trial treatment.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012)ITT population included all participants who were randomized to trial treatment.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYBest Overall Response (BOR) Rate: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsEvery 6 weeks until progression, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012)ITT population included all participants who were randomized to trial treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)
Analysis population included participants who had at least one evaluable EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and were also included in the ITT population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QoL) Assessed by EuroQol 5Dimensions (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)
Analysis population included participants who had at least one evaluable EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire and were also included in the ITT population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSafety - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Time from first dose up to Day 30 after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)The safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of any trial treatment that is, cetuximab, cisplatin, or capecitabine.participantsNUMBER

Results by group74

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin4.495% Confidence Interval 4.2 to 5.5months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin5.695% Confidence Interval 5.1 to 5.7months
Overall Survival (OS)Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin9.495% Confidence Interval 8.3 to 10.6months
Overall Survival (OS)Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin10.795% Confidence Interval 9.4 to 11.3months
Best Overall Response (BOR) Rate: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin29.995% Confidence Interval 25.7 to 34.3percentage of participants
Best Overall Response (BOR) Rate: Independent Review Committee (IRC) AssessmentsCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin29.295% Confidence Interval 25.0 to 33.6percentage of participants
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus CisplatinGlobal health status: Baseline57.49Standard Deviation 22.168units on a scale
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Capecitabine Plus CisplatinGlobal health status: Baseline57.19Standard Deviation 22.124units on a scale
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus CisplatinGlobal health status: Week 659.00Standard Deviation 21.879units on a scale
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Capecitabine Plus CisplatinGlobal health status: Week 661.80Standard Deviation 22.089units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin455
Overall StudySTARTEDCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin449
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin362
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin351
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin93
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin98

Adverse events584

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin194446
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin234436
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin127446
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin155436
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin81446
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin89436
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin67446
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin94436
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin20446
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin23436

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin
Total, all-cause mortalityCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin
Total, other adverse eventsCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin441446
Total, other adverse eventsCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin429436
Total, serious adverse eventsCetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin239446
Total, serious adverse eventsCapecitabine Plus Cisplatin194436

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin vs Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin: Safety - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Trial comparisons
Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin vs Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00678535

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00678535/results?page=2