ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00679627

A Study of Galantamine Used to Treat Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

NCT00679627, Phase 3, Terminated, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2013-09-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Galantamine Used to Treat Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease. Trials, record NCT00679627. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00679627

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Galantamine Used to Treat Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
NCT number
NCT00679627
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
2,051 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Alzheimer's Disease
Interventions
Galantamine, Placebo
First posted
2008-05-19
Last updated
2013-09-19
Results first posted
2013-09-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreBaseline, Month 24
The MMSE is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used or the assessment of dementia patients' cognitive impairment. Evaluation of points are as follows: 24 to 30 = no cognitive impairment, 18 to 23 = mild cognitive impairment, 0 to 17 = severe cognitive impairment. Lower scores indicate worsening.
PrimaryThe Number of Deaths Reported in ParticipantsUp to 2 yearsAn external Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was assigned for this study to monitor the progress of the study and to ensure that the safety of participants was not compromised.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
The MMSE is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used or the assessment of dementia patients' cognitive impairment. Evaluation of points are as follows: 24 to 30 = no cognitive impairment, 18 to 23 = mild cognitive impairment, 0 to 17 = severe cognitive impairment. Lower scores indicate worsening.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) ScoresBaseline, Month 24
The DAD assesses physical activities of daily living and instrumental-activities of daily livings of participants with Alzheimer disease. This measure is a validated, disability assessment scale that collects information regarding the ability of a participant to initiate, plan, organize, and perform activities of daily living, as based on a structured interview with the caregiver. The maximum scores were 13 for initiation, 10 for planning and organizing, and 17 for effective performance in order to yield a total maximum score of 40. These scores were normalized to a scale of 100 for analysis.A higher score, or percentage of items that can be performed represents fewer disabilities in carrying out activities of daily living while a lower percentage indicates an increase in disabilities.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Accommodation Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)Baseline, Months 12 and 24
The APAS-CarB is a measure used to evaluate participant status and caregiver burden. The table below presents Patient Accommodation assessed as the percentage of participants "home with friend or relative" using the APAS-CarB.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Caregiver Time Spent With the Patient Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)Baseline, Months 12 and 24The table below presents the number of days that caregiving activities were provided during the past week.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Institutional StatusBaseline, Month 24This table describes the number of participants who were reported as institutionalized at baseline and Month 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Subscales (Orientation, Registration, Attention and Calculation, Recall, and Language)Baseline, Month 24
The MMSE, is a validated, brief examination that rates subjects on orientation (total score, 10), registration (total score, 3), attention (total score, 5), calculation (total score, 5), recall (total score, 3), and language (total score, 9). The maximum score is 30 (only the higher of the two scores for attention and calculation \[each with a maximum score of 5\] was used). A higher score compared with baseline indicates less impairment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) Subscales (Initiation, Planning and Organization, Effective Performance, Basic, Instrumental, and Leisure)Baseline, Month 24
The DAD assesses physical activities of daily living and instrumental-activities of daily livings of participants with Alzheimer disease. This measure is a validated, disability assessment scale that collects information regarding the ability of a participant to initiate, plan, organize, and perform activities of daily living, as based on a structured interview with the caregiver. The maximum scores were 13 for initiation, 10 for planning and organizing, and 17 for effective performance in order to yield a total maximum score of 40. These scores were normalized to a scale of 100 for analysis.A higher score, or percentage of items that can be performed represents fewer disabilities in carrying out activities of daily living while a lower percentage indicates an increase in disabilities.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreBaseline, Month 24
An intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for the primary analysis. The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline MMSE measure.
Scores on scaleMEAN
PRIMARYThe Number of Deaths Reported in ParticipantsUp to 2 yearsThe safety analysis was performed on the safety population, ie, all randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.Number of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreBaseline, Month 6
An intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for the primary analysis. The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline MMSE measure.
Scores on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) ScoresBaseline, Month 24
An intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for the analysis. The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline DAD measure.
Scores on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient Accommodation Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)Baseline, Months 12 and 24
An intent-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used for the analysis. The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline APAS-CarB measure.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Caregiver Time Spent With the Patient Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)Baseline, Months 12 and 24The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline measure.DaysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Institutional StatusBaseline, Month 24The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline measure.Number of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Subscales (Orientation, Registration, Attention and Calculation, Recall, and Language)Baseline, Month 24The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of treatment and had at least 1 postbaseline MMSE measure.Scores on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) Subscales (Initiation, Planning and Organization, Effective Performance, Basic, Instrumental, and Leisure)Baseline, Month 24This analysis was performed in the intent-to-treat population which included all randomized participants who had at least 1 postbaseline DAD measure.Scores on scaleMEAN

Results by group46

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScorePlacebo-2.14Standard Deviation 4.340Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreGalantamine-1.41Standard Deviation 4.050Scores on scale
The Number of Deaths Reported in ParticipantsPlacebo56Number of Participants
The Number of Deaths Reported in ParticipantsGalantamine33Number of Participants
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScorePlacebo-0.28Standard Deviation 2.938Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScoreGalantamine0.15Standard Deviation 2.725Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) ScoresPlacebo-10.81Standard Deviation 18.268Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) ScoresGalantamine-8.16Standard Deviation 17.251Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Accommodation Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)PlaceboHome with friend or relative - Baseline62.1Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Patient Accommodation Measured Using the Assessment of Subject Accommodation Status and Caregiver Burden (APAS-CarB)GalantamineHome with friend or relative - Baseline62.8Percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo1,021
Overall StudySTARTEDGalantamine1,024
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo322
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGalantamine339
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo699
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGalantamine685

Adverse events388

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo481,021
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersGalantamine571,024
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo241,021
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersGalantamine851,024
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo581,021
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersGalantamine581,024
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo11,021
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGalantamine01,024
seriousAcute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disordersPlacebo11,021
seriousAcute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disordersGalantamine11,024

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityGalantamine
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1151,021
Total, other adverse eventsGalantamine1681,024
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1231,021
Total, serious adverse eventsGalantamine1291,024

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24591834DERIVEDPubMed
27846868DERIVEDPubMed
39498781DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Galantamine vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00679627

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00679627/results?page=2