ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00682786

Genotype-directed Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Carcinoma

NCT00682786, Phase 2, Completed, Washington University School of Medicine; results first posted 2014-09-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Genotype-directed Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Carcinoma. Trials, record NCT00682786. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00682786

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Genotype-directed Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Carcinoma
NCT number
NCT00682786
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
135 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Conditions
Rectal Carcinoma
Interventions
5FU, Radiation, Surgery of resectable lesions, Irinotecan
First posted
2008-05-22
Last updated
2017-10-06
Results first posted
2014-09-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRate of Tumor Downstaging Compared With Historical Controls.1 year after enrollmentTumor downstaging (DS) is defined as a decrease in the T stage of the primary tumor by at least 1. Historical studies demonstrate a DS rate of 45%.
SecondaryComplete Response Rates1 year after enrollment
Complete tumor response is defined as the absence of any viable tumor in the rectum (ypT0). Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as the absence of any viable tumor in the rectum or in the perirectal lymph nodes (ypT0N0). pCR rate of historical controls is 8%-14%.
SecondaryDefine Patient Quality of Life Prior to and Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.Prior to start of study treatment and 3-6 weeks post completion of radiation therapyThe questionnaire is encouraged but not required.
SecondaryDetermine Patient Fears and Expectations of Pharmacogenetics.Prior to start of study treatment and 3-6 weeks post completion of radiation therapyThe questionnaire is encouraged but not required.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRate of Tumor Downstaging Compared With Historical Controls.1 year after enrollment
8 not evaluable in Good Risk arm-(1)death before surgery (1)clinical CR w/o surgery (1)refused surgery (2)not resectable (2)withdrew consent (1)delayed surgery and given FOLFOX~6 not evaluable in Poor Risk arm-(1) death prior to surgery (1)clinical CR no surgery (1)refused surgery (2)withdrew consent (1)not given irinotecan by treating physician
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYComplete Response Rates1 year after enrollment
8 not evaluable in Good Risk arm-(1)death before surgery (1)clinical CR w/o surgery (1)refused surgery (2)not resectable (2)withdrew consent (1)delayed surgery and given FOLFOX~6 not evaluable in Poor Risk arm-(1) death prior to surgery (1)clinical CR no surgery (1)refused surgery (2)withdrew consent (1)not given irinotecan by treating physician
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDefine Patient Quality of Life Prior to and Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.Prior to start of study treatment and 3-6 weeks post completion of radiation therapyThe data was not collected for this outcome measure as the questionnaire was encouraged but not required.
SECONDARYDetermine Patient Fears and Expectations of Pharmacogenetics.Prior to start of study treatment and 3-6 weeks post completion of radiation therapyThe data was not collected for this outcome measure as the questionnaire was encouraged but not required.
POST_HOCToxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgeryTwo of the patients in the Good Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included. Two of the patients in the Poor Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included.participantsNUMBER
POST_HOCOverall Survival1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsTwo of the patients in the Good Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included. Two of the patients in the Poor Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included.percentage of participantsNUMBER
POST_HOCRelapse-free Survival1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
14 patients in the Good Risk arm had metastatic rectal cancer at time of enrollment are not included in this analyses.~3 patients in the Poor Risk arm had metastatic rectal disease before surgery and are included in this analyses.~2 of the patients in the Good Risk arm and Poork Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
POST_HOCAssociations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery2 of the patients in the Good Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included.participantsNUMBER
POST_HOCAssociations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery2 of the patients in the Poor Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included.participantsNUMBER
POST_HOCAssociations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery2 of the patients in the Good Risk arm withdrew consent and are not included.participantsNUMBER

Results by group128

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Rate of Tumor Downstaging Compared With Historical Controls.Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)64.495% Confidence Interval 54.1 to 74.6percentage of participants
Rate of Tumor Downstaging Compared With Historical Controls.Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)64.595% Confidence Interval 43.7 to 78.9percentage of participants
Complete Response RatesGood Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)ypT020percentage of participants
Complete Response RatesPoor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)ypT041.9percentage of participants
Complete Response RatesGood Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)pCR18.9percentage of participants
Complete Response RatesPoor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)pCR35.5percentage of participants
Toxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)Nausea0participants
Toxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)Nausea1participants
Toxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)Vomiting0participants
Toxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)Vomiting1participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)98
Overall StudySTARTEDPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)37
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)96
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)34
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)3

Adverse events178

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukocytes (total WBC)InvestigationsGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)3096
otherLeukocytes (total WBC)InvestigationsPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)2035
otherPlateletsInvestigationsGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)1296
otherPlateletsInvestigationsPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)135
otherHemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disordersGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)6696
otherHemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disordersPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)3035
otherNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)InvestigationsGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)896
otherNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)InvestigationsPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)1135
otherLymphopeniaInvestigationsGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)8896
otherLymphopeniaInvestigationsPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)3235

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)
Total, all-cause mortalityPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)
Total, other adverse eventsGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)9696
Total, other adverse eventsPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)3535
Total, serious adverse eventsGood Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)1696
Total, serious adverse eventsPoor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4)1235

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Good Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4) vs Poor Risk (Thymidylate Synthase (TYMS)*3/*3, *3/*4): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00682786

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00682786/results?page=2