ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00683618

Compare the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin to Atorvastatin in High Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

NCT00683618, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2012-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Compare the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin to Atorvastatin in High Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia. Trials, record NCT00683618. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00683618

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Compare the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin to Atorvastatin in High Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia
NCT number
NCT00683618
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
934 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia
Interventions
Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin
First posted
2008-05-23
Last updated
2012-03-21
Results first posted
2012-03-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 5mg With Atorvastatin 10mgbaseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a two-sided significance level of 0.025 on ITT population.
PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 10mg With Atorvastatin 10mgbaseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.025 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC ) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Non High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (nonHDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C/HDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeks
Analyzed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with factors fitted for treatment, centre, risk factor, lipid concentration at baseline, treatment by centre and treatment by risk factor with a significance level of 0.05 on ITT population.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 5mg With Atorvastatin 10mgbaseline, 6 weekspercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 10mg With Atorvastatin 10mgbaseline, 6 weeksPercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC ) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (TG) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Non High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (nonHDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C/HDL-C) at Week 6baseline, 6 weeksPatients who have baseline HDL-C and at least one post baseline HDL-C. Not all patients in ITT meet the conditions since ITT is for all lipid variables instead of individual variable.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 5mg With Atorvastatin 10mgRosuvastatin 5mg-41.70Standard Error 2.62percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 5mg With Atorvastatin 10mgAtorvastatin 10mg-38.67Standard Error 2.64percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 10mg With Atorvastatin 10mgRosuvastatin 10mg-46.28Standard Error 2.62Percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Concentration After 6 Weeks of Treatment Comparing Rosuvastatin 10mg With Atorvastatin 10mgAtorvastatin 10mg-38.67Standard Error 2.64Percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6Rosuvastatin 5mg5.63Standard Error 2.29percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6Rosuvastatin 10mg6.82Standard Error 2.29percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 6Atorvastatin 10mg3.64Standard Error 2.31percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC ) at Week 6Rosuvastatin 5mg-29.62Standard Error 1.92percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC ) at Week 6Rosuvastatin 10mg-33.14Standard Error 1.91percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC ) at Week 6Atorvastatin 10mg-28.06Standard Error 1.93percent change

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Randomised Treatment PeriodSTARTEDRosuvastatin 5mg145
Randomised Treatment PeriodSTARTEDRosuvastatin 10mg145
Randomised Treatment PeriodSTARTEDAtorvastatin 10mg146
Randomised Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDRosuvastatin 5mg139
Randomised Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDRosuvastatin 10mg143
Randomised Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDAtorvastatin 10mg140
Randomised Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDRosuvastatin 5mg6
Randomised Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDRosuvastatin 10mg2
Randomised Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDAtorvastatin 10mg6
Extension Treatment PeriodSTARTEDRosuvastatin 5mg36

Adverse events15

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAlanine AminotransferaseInvestigationsRosuvastatin 5mg2145
otherAlanine AminotransferaseInvestigationsRosuvastatin 10mg0145
otherAlanine AminotransferaseInvestigationsAtorvastatin 10mg0146
otherBlood Creatine Phosphokinase IncreasedInvestigationsRosuvastatin 5mg2145
otherBlood Creatine Phosphokinase IncreasedInvestigationsRosuvastatin 10mg3145
otherBlood Creatine Phosphokinase IncreasedInvestigationsAtorvastatin 10mg0146
otherMyalgiaRenal and urinary disordersRosuvastatin 5mg1145
otherMyalgiaRenal and urinary disordersRosuvastatin 10mg0145
otherMyalgiaRenal and urinary disordersAtorvastatin 10mg0146
seriousFoot FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsRosuvastatin 5mg1145

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRosuvastatin 5mg
Total, all-cause mortalityRosuvastatin 10mg
Total, all-cause mortalityAtorvastatin 10mg
Total, other adverse eventsRosuvastatin 5mg5145
Total, other adverse eventsRosuvastatin 10mg3145
Total, other adverse eventsAtorvastatin 10mg0146
Total, serious adverse eventsRosuvastatin 5mg1145
Total, serious adverse eventsRosuvastatin 10mg0145
Total, serious adverse eventsAtorvastatin 10mg1146

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
28836458DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00683618

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00683618/results?page=2