ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00687102

Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene

NCT00687102, Phase 3, Completed, Wake Forest University; results first posted 2018-01-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene. Trials, record NCT00687102. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00687102

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene
NCT number
NCT00687102
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,498 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University
Conditions
Cognition, Aging
Interventions
tamoxifen, raloxifene
First posted
2008-05-30
Last updated
2018-09-12
Results first posted
2018-01-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline on the the Benton Visual Retention Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the Benton Visual Retention (BVRT) Test scores. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. The BVRT measures short term visual memory and visuo-constructional abilities. Each of 10 designs was presented one at a time for 10 seconds, and immediately after the design was withdrawn, the participant was instructed to draw it from memory on a blank sheet of paper. The score on the BVRT is the total number of errors, 0-26 represents the total number of theoretically possible errors. Lower score denotes better outcomes.
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. The experimenter reads a list of 16 nouns aloud, at one-second intervals, in fixed order, over 3 learning trials (list A) . After each trial, the subject is asked to recall as many words as they can in any order (i.e., free recall) given a score 0-16 each. Total range as the sum of the 3 learning trials: 0 - 48. Participants were asked to recall a second interference list (List B) with a score range of 0-16. Free recall of list A are tested immediately after list B (short-delay) Total range 0- 16 , and again after 20 minutes (long-delay) 0-16. Each part of the scale is reported separately as Total List A trials, Total List B trials, Short-delay free recall, and Long-delay free recall.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline on the Letter Fluency and Semantic Fluency Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the Letter Fluency Test scores. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. Measures cognitive function. In this test, the participant names as many words as possible in 1 minute, beginning with each letter for letter fluency (F, A, and S) and category for semantic fluency (fruits and vegetables). To score the administrator, counts up the total number letters or words that the individual is able to produce. The score minimum would be 0 and the maximum would be the total of correct items named within 1 minute. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline on Digit Span Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the Digit Span Test - Digits Forward and Digits backward Test scores. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. Measures reasoning, verbal ability, and memory. The participant is asked to provide immediate recall of a series of digits in forward and backward sequences. The individual's score is the total number of items correctly repeated forwards or backwards. Total range 0 - 14, higher results denotes a better outcome.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline on Card Rotations Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the Card Rotations Test scores. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. Measures the ability to mentally manipulate figures in two and three-dimensions. On each of 28 trials, participants view sample line drawings of a geometric figure and 8 alterations representing 2 or 3-dimensional rotations of the drawing. Participants are asked to identify alternatives that show the sample in 2-D but not in 3-D. Total range 0 - 160 and the number of incorrect/correct responses is measure. Higher number of correct answers is a better outcome.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline on the Finger Tapping Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the the Finger Tapping Test scores. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. Measures motor speed, coordination, attention, alertness, slowing of responses, and motor control. In this test of motor speed and dexterity participants are asked to depress a lever as many times as possible in each of 7, 10-second trials, first with the right hand and next with the left hand. The highest and lowest scores are dropped; the score is the average of the remaining five trials for each hand.Higher scores represent better outcomes.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. Measures positive and negative affect. Mood is assessed with the PANAS, a list of ten pleasant mood states (e.g., interested, proud, inspired) and ten unpleasant mood states (e.g., irritable, guilty, jittery). Respondents are asked to rate on a 5-point scale (1 being "very slightly or not at all" and 5 being "extremely") the extent to which they have experienced each mood during a specific time frame. Ratings for each item can range from 0 to 4 with total scores for positive affect and negative affect subscales ranging from 0 to 40. For positive affect, higher scores denote higher levels of positive affect and for negative affect, lower scores denote lower levels of negative affect.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline on the Geriatric Depression Scale Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 Years
Mean Change From Baseline on the Geriatric Depression Scale. Adjusted for age, ethnicity, education, and baseline measure, for participants with true baseline measures. Measures depression in older adults. Mood is also assessed with the 15-item short form of the GDS which measures non-somatic features of depressed mood. Participants indicate the presence or absence of each symptom. The GDS-SF score is the total number of positive depressive items. Score range is 0-15, with 0-4 denoting better outcomes and a score of 5 and above denoting worse outcomes (depression).

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline on the the Benton Visual Retention Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.Number of errorsMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.correct responsesMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline on the Letter Fluency and Semantic Fluency Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.change in number of wordsMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline on Digit Span Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline on Card Rotations Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.correct responsesMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline on the Finger Tapping Test Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.finger tapsMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline on the Geriatric Depression Scale Scores by Treatment GroupBaseline and 3 YearsWomen who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline on the the Benton Visual Retention Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen-0.73Standard Error 0.34Number of errors
Mean Change From Baseline on the the Benton Visual Retention Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene-1.41Standard Error 0.32Number of errors
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to TamoxifenTotal List A trials-3.31Standard Error 0.50correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to RaloxifeneTotal List A trials-1.89Standard Error 0.48correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to TamoxifenTotal List B trials-1.56Standard Error 0.19correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to RaloxifeneTotal List B trials-1.74Standard Error 0.18correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to TamoxifenShort-delay free recall-0.96Standard Error 0.25correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to RaloxifeneShort-delay free recall-0.36Standard Error 0.24correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to TamoxifenLong-delay free recall-0.23Standard Error 0.25correct responses
Mean Change From Baseline on the the California Verbal Learning Test Scores by Treatment GroupStar Participants Assigned to RaloxifeneLong-delay free recall0.10Standard Error 0.24correct responses

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen733
Overall StudySTARTEDStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene765
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen733
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene765
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen
Total, all-cause mortalityStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene
Total, other adverse eventsStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen0733
Total, other adverse eventsStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene0765
Total, serious adverse eventsStar Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen0733
Total, serious adverse eventsStar Participants Assigned to Raloxifene0765

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
9409335BACKGROUNDPubMed
9799627BACKGROUNDPubMed
11156805BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R13AG0202187th Annual Graylyn Conference: Women's Cognitive HealthSHUMAKER, SALLYWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING2001

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Star Participants Assigned to Tamoxifen vs Star Participants Assigned to Raloxifene: serious adverse events

Tests5

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Verbal LearningPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Category FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Finger Tapping TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00687102

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00687102/results?page=2