ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00695565

Efficacy and Safety Study of ARC-4558 for Management of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

NCT00695565, Phase 2, Completed, Arcion Therapeutics Inc; results first posted 2016-11-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of ARC-4558 for Management of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. Trials, record NCT00695565. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00695565

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of ARC-4558 for Management of Pain Associated With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
NCT number
NCT00695565
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
180 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Arcion Therapeutics Inc
Conditions
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Interventions
Placebo Gel, Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)
First posted
2008-06-12
Last updated
2016-11-08
Results first posted
2016-11-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (Average of Days 78 to 84)
Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) through Day 84. Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 was "worst possible pain". The change in pain is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement (more pain relief).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Weeks 1 through 12 (weekly averages)
Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 was "worst possible pain". A weekly average was calculated from the daily scores for each week. The change in pain is represented as the average weekly score minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement (more pain relief).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Worst Daily Pain NPRS Score; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)
Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale. Subjects were asked to record the worst pain in their feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 was "worst possible pain". The change in pain is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent greater improvement (greater pain relief).
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)
Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 was "worst possible pain".
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)
Pain in the feet was scored daily at bedtime by the subject on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Subjects were asked to record average pain in the feet over the past 24 hours. A score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 was "worst possible pain".
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale at Week 12; mLOCF ImputationBaseline and Week 12
The Brief Pain Inventory was completed by the subject at clinic visits. The Severity Scale (of 0 to 40) is a composite score, which is the sum of the individual ratings for worst pain, least pain, average pain, and current pain. Each individual question is rated on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "No Pain" and 10 indicates "Pain as bad as you can imagine". The change in pain severity is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent greater improvement (pain relief).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Functional Interference Scale at Week 12; mLOCF ImputationBaseline and Week 12
The Brief Pain Inventory was completed by the subject at clinic visits. The Functional Interference Scale (of 0 to 70) is a composite score that measures the degree to which pain interferes with mood, walking, work, relationships, sleep, general activity, and enjoyment of life. The composite score is a sum of the seven individual question scores. Each individual question is rated in reference to pain over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates that pain "does not interfere" and 10 indicates that pain "completely interferes" with that function, so lower scores represent better outcomes on this scale. The change in functional interference is represented as Week 12 minus Baseline, so greater negative numbers represent more improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Overall Quality of Sleep (Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory)Baseline and Week 12
Subjects rated overall quality of sleep over the past week using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 100=Excellent and 0=Very Poor. This scale was completed during clinic visits. Change from Baseline is a positive value where quality of sleep improved.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Depression Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline and Week 12
The HADS was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The Depression Score component of the HADS includes 7 questions, each with 4 possible answer choices (rated 0 to 3). The composite score is created by adding the scores of the 7 individual questions. A score of 0 to 7 is Normal, 8-10 indicates Mild Depression, 11-14 indicates Moderate Depression, and 15-21 indicates Severe Depression. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 composite score minus the Baseline composite score.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Anxiety Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline and Week 12
The HADS was completed at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. The Anxiety Score component of the HADS includes 7 questions, each with 4 possible answer choices (rated 0 to 3). The composite score is created by adding the scores of the 7 individual questions. A score of 0 to 7 is Normal, 8-10 indicates Mild Anxiety, 11-14 indicates Moderate Anxiety, and 15-21 indicates Severe Anxiety. The change from Baseline is calculated as the Week 12 composite score minus the Baseline composite score.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (Average of Days 78 to 84)
One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was mLOCF (modified Last Observation Carried Forward): LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication (in which case Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF) was used).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Weeks 1 through 12 (weekly averages)
One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation)
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Worst Daily Pain NPRS Score; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)
One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)
One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation).
percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Who Experience at Least 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain From Baseline; mLOCF ImputationBaseline (average of Days -7 to -1) and Week 12 (average of Days 78 to 84)
One treated subject had no recorded scores and could not be included. Imputation was a modified LOCF (LOCF for subjects who discontinued early, except if withdrawal was associated with an adverse event (AE) potentially related to study medication, in which case BOCF was used). Additional BOCF analyses have been published (Pain 2012, see citation).
percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Scale at Week 12; mLOCF ImputationBaseline and Week 12
One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory Functional Interference Scale at Week 12; mLOCF ImputationBaseline and Week 12
One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Overall Quality of Sleep (Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory)Baseline and Week 12
One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Depression Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline and Week 12
One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Anxiety Score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline and Week 12
One subject in the active Clonidine Gel group was lost to follow-up before Baseline pain scores were confirmed and before any post-baseline efficacy evaluations were performed. This subject was excluded from the efficacy analyses.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group74

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationPlacebo GelAll subjects-1.9Standard Deviation 1.9units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)All subjects-2.4Standard Deviation 2.1units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationPlacebo GelCapsaicin response ≥ 2-1.5Standard Deviation 1.8units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Average Daily Pain NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) Score; mLOCF ImputationClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Capsaicin response ≥ 2-2.7Standard Deviation 1.9units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationPlacebo GelWeek 1-0.6Standard Deviation 1.01units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Week 1-0.7Standard Deviation 1.34units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationPlacebo GelWeek 2-1.0Standard Deviation 1.30units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Week 2-1.0Standard Deviation 1.45units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationPlacebo GelWeek 3-1.2Standard Deviation 1.47units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain NPRS Score for Each Week of Treatment; mLOCF ImputationClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)Week 3-1.5Standard Deviation 1.58units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Gel90
Overall StudySTARTEDClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)90
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Gel77
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)81
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Gel13
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)9

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo Gel1090
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)690
otherPain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo Gel790
otherPain in ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)390
otherPainGeneral disordersPlacebo Gel690
otherPainGeneral disordersClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)090
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo Gel490
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)590
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Gel190
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)590

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Gel
Total, all-cause mortalityClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Gel2890
Total, other adverse eventsClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)1990
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Gel390
Total, serious adverse eventsClonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558)390

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22683276RESULTPubMed
35587172DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Clonidine Topical Gel (ARC-4558) vs Placebo Gel: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00695565

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00695565/results?page=2