ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00715520

Neurobiological Principles Applied to the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients

NCT00715520, Not applicable, Completed, Emory University; results first posted 2017-10-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Neurobiological Principles Applied to the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients. Trials, record NCT00715520. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00715520

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Neurobiological Principles Applied to the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
NCT number
NCT00715520
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
33 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Carbidopa-Levodopa, Methylphenidate, Amphetamine Sulfate, Placebo, Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Training
First posted
2008-07-15
Last updated
2017-10-16
Results first posted
2017-10-16
Limitations and caveats
Target enrollment for aim 3 was not me due to difficulty identifying participants that met the inclusion criteria. Therefore the study team did not have a sufficient sample size to complete any data analysis for this aim.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.
PrimaryAim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension MovementsBaseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
SecondaryAim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to PulseBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Mean sum of normalized MEP for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect to the pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in mV. Long- lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.
SecondaryAim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to PulseBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Mean peak acceleration of wrist movements for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect of the TMS pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
SecondaryAim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to FrequencyBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Mean sum of normalized MEP for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo at 0.1 Hz, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning.
SecondaryAim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to FrequencyBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Mean peak acceleration for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
SecondaryAim 3: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.
SecondaryAim 3: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension MovementsBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)Analysis was completed in Aim 1 participants per protocol for the placebo condition. One subject was not included in the analysis due to corrupt data.mVMEAN
PRIMARYAim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension MovementsBaseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)Analysis was completed in Aim 1 participants per protocol. One subject was not included in the analysis due to corrupt data.gMEAN
SECONDARYAim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to PulseBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.millivoltsMEAN
SECONDARYAim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to PulseBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.gMEAN
SECONDARYAim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to FrequencyBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.millivoltsMEAN
SECONDARYAim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to FrequencyBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.gMEAN
SECONDARYAim 3: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)No sufficient data collected.
SECONDARYAim 3: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension MovementsBaseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)No sufficient data collected.

Results by group88

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Baseline Placebo - MEPmax1.01Standard Error .13mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Post-Training 1 Placebo - MEPmax1.63Standard Error .33mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Post-Training 2 Placebo - MEPmax1.29Standard Error .05mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Baseline - Amphetamine Sulfate - MEPmax.73Standard Error .10mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Post-Training 1 Ampletamine Sulfate - MEPmax1.22Standard Error .26mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Post-Training 2 Amphetamine Sulfate - MEPmax1.08Standard Error .04mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Baseline Methylphenidate - MEPmax1.04Standard Error .13mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Post-Training 1 Methylphenidate - MEPmax1.10Standard Error .12mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Post-Training 2 Methylphenidate - MEPmax1.22Standard Error .06mV
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)Aim 1Baseline Carbidopa-Levodopa - MEPmax1.81Standard Error .62mV

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAim 120
Overall StudySTARTEDAim 210
Overall StudySTARTEDAim 33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAim 110
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAim 29
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAim 31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAim 110
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAim 21
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAim 32

Adverse events27

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVertioEar and labyrinth disordersAim 11101
otherVertioEar and labyrinth disordersAim 2090
otherVertioEar and labyrinth disordersAim 3010
otherIncreased Blood PressureVascular disordersAim 11101
otherIncreased Blood PressureVascular disordersAim 2090
otherIncreased Blood PressureVascular disordersAim 3010
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersAim 13103
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersAim 2090
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersAim 3010
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersAim 11101

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAim 1010
Total, all-cause mortalityAim 209
Total, all-cause mortalityAim 301
Total, other adverse eventsAim 1510
Total, other adverse eventsAim 209
Total, other adverse eventsAim 311
Total, serious adverse eventsAim 1010
Total, serious adverse eventsAim 209
Total, serious adverse eventsAim 301

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01NS060830Neurobiological principles applied to the rehabilitation of stroke patientsBUETEFISCH, CATHRIN MEMORY UNIVERSITYNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE2007 to 2010

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00715520

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00715520/results?page=2