ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00716144

Dose Ranging Study of the Safety and Efficacy of R115966 in Plaque Psoriasis

NCT00716144, Phase 2, Completed, Stiefel, a GSK Company; results first posted 2018-01-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dose Ranging Study of the Safety and Efficacy of R115966 in Plaque Psoriasis. Trials, record NCT00716144. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00716144

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dose Ranging Study of the Safety and Efficacy of R115966 in Plaque Psoriasis
NCT number
NCT00716144
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
176 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stiefel, a GSK Company
Conditions
Psoriasis
Interventions
Talarozole
First posted
2008-07-16
Last updated
2018-01-29
Results first posted
2018-01-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPsoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 Success at Visit 6Week 12 (Visit 6)
PASI75 success at Visit 6 was defined as number of participants who achieved at least 75% reduction in PASI scores at Visit 6 compared to Visit 2 (Baseline). The PASI score was determined through evaluation of body surface area (BSA) covered by plaque psoriasis in four regions (head/neck, upper extremities, trunk and lower extremities). This assessment included a combination of both degree of involvement (assessed as per the % of affected body area using a 7-point scale that ranged as 0 (0% involvement), 1 = 1-9%, 2 = 10-29%, 3 = 30-49%, 4 = 50-69%, 5 = 70-89% and 6 = 90-100%) and severity (evaluated individually using a 5-point scale that ranged as 0 = No evidence of sign, 1 = slight evidence of sign, 2 = moderate evidence of sign, 3 = marked evidence of sign and 4 = very marked, most severe evidence of sign) of erythema, induration and desquamation in each of the same four regions. PASI score ranged from 0 to 72 in 0.1-unit intervals; higher scores indicating worse psoriasis.
SecondaryPASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitWeek 1 to Week 20 (Visit 3 to Visit 8)
PASI50 success was defined as number of participants who achieved at least 50% reduction in PASI scores at each post baseline visit (Visit 3 to 8) compared to Visit 2 (Baseline). The PASI score was determined through evaluation of BSA covered by plaque psoriasis in four regions (head/neck, upper extremities, trunk and lower extremities). This assessment included a combination of both degree of involvement (assessed as per the % of affected body area using a 7-point scale that ranged as 0 (0% involvement), 1 = 1-9%, 2 = 10-29%, 3 = 30-49%, 4 = 50-69%, 5 = 70-89% and 6 = 90-100%) and severity (evaluated individually using a 5-point scale that ranged as 0 = No evidence of sign, 1 = slight evidence of sign, 2 = moderate evidence of sign, 3 = marked evidence of sign and 4 = very marked, most severe evidence of sign) of erythema, induration and desquamation in each of the same four regions. PASI score ranged from 0 to 72 in 0.1-unit intervals; higher scores indicating worse psoriasis.
SecondaryInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Each Post Baseline VisitWeek 1 to Week 20 (Visit 3 to Visit 8)
The IGA was used to assess the overall severity of a participant's plaque psoriasis at a particular time point and the evaluation took into consideration the three individual characteristics of plaque psoriasis (scaling, plaque elevation, and erythema). The IGA was recorded using a scale that ranged from 0 (clear), 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate to 4 (severe) in whole-unit increments; higher scores indicating worse psoriasis. Investigators did not refer to previous evaluations when conducting the IGA assessment. At every study visit, the investigator evaluated each participant's plaque psoriasis and recorded the one integer grade that best described the average, overall severity of the condition. Investigators were trained not to refer to previous assessments of the IGA, and not to base the IGA scores on any component of the PASI. Individual body regions were not assessed (as in the PASI), but rather a global evaluation for each participant at each visit was determined.
SecondaryPASI75 at Each Post Baseline Visit Except Visit 6Week 1 to Week 20 (Visit 3 to Visit 8) except Week 12 (Visit 6)
PASI75 success was defined as number of participants who achieved at least 75% reduction in PASI scores at each post baseline visit (Visit 3 to Visit 8) except Visit 6. The PASI score was determined through evaluation of BSA covered by plaque psoriasis in four regions (head/neck, upper extremities, trunk and lower extremities). This assessment included a combination of both degree of involvement (assessed as per the % of affected body area using a 7-point scale that ranged as 0 (0% involvement), 1 = 1-9%, 2 = 10-29%, 3 = 30-49%, 4 = 50-69%, 5 = 70-89% and 6 = 90-100%) and severity (evaluated individually using a 5-point scale that ranged as 0 = No evidence of sign, 1 = slight evidence of sign, 2 = moderate evidence of sign, 3 = marked evidence of sign and 4 = very marked, most severe evidence of sign) of erythema, induration and desquamation in each of the same four regions. PASI score ranged from 0 to 72 in 0.1-unit intervals; higher scores indicating worse psoriasis.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPsoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 Success at Visit 6Week 12 (Visit 6)
Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) population. MITT population comprised of all randomized participants who took study medication and provided post-Visit 2 efficacy data (i.e., had one on-therapy follow-up visit).
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitWeek 1 to Week 20 (Visit 3 to Visit 8)MITT population.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) at Each Post Baseline VisitWeek 1 to Week 20 (Visit 3 to Visit 8)
MITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points; thus, the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the MITT Population.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPASI75 at Each Post Baseline Visit Except Visit 6Week 1 to Week 20 (Visit 3 to Visit 8) except Week 12 (Visit 6)MITT population.ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group168

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 Success at Visit 6Placebo4Participants
Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 Success at Visit 6R115866 0.5 mg7Participants
Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 Success at Visit 6R115866 1.0 mg4Participants
Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)75 Success at Visit 6R115866 2.0 mg5Participants
PASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitPlaceboVisit 30Participants
PASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitR115866 0.5 mgVisit 30Participants
PASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitR115866 1.0 mgVisit 30Participants
PASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitR115866 2.0 mgVisit 30Participants
PASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitPlaceboVisit 42Participants
PASI50 Success (the Reduction in PASI Score at Each Visit of at Least 50 Percent Relative to Visit 2) at Each Post Baseline VisitR115866 0.5 mgVisit 40Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo41
Overall StudySTARTEDR115866 0.5 mg45
Overall StudySTARTEDR115866 1.0 mg45
Overall StudySTARTEDR115866 2.0 mg45
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo32
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDR115866 0.5 mg38
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDR115866 1.0 mg33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDR115866 2.0 mg33
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDR115866 0.5 mg7

Adverse events80

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo241
otherCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersR115866 0.5 mg345
otherCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersR115866 1.0 mg145
otherCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersR115866 2.0 mg245
otherDry eyeEye disordersPlacebo141
otherDry eyeEye disordersR115866 0.5 mg345
otherDry eyeEye disordersR115866 1.0 mg645
otherDry eyeEye disordersR115866 2.0 mg345
otherCheilitisGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo041
otherCheilitisGastrointestinal disordersR115866 0.5 mg1045

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo041
Total, all-cause mortalityR115866 0.5 mg045
Total, all-cause mortalityR115866 1.0 mg045
Total, all-cause mortalityR115866 2.0 mg045
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2041
Total, other adverse eventsR115866 0.5 mg3445
Total, other adverse eventsR115866 1.0 mg3845
Total, other adverse eventsR115866 2.0 mg3745
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo141
Total, serious adverse eventsR115866 0.5 mg145

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00716144

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00716144/results?page=2