ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effects of Atomoxetine on Brain Activation During Attention & Reading Tasks in Participants With ADHD & Comorbid Dyslexia

NCT00716274, Phase 4, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2018-02-07

Trial 12

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffects of Atomoxetine on Brain Activation During Attention & Reading Tasks in Participants With ADHD & Comorbid DyslexiaClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT00716274ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPhase 4ClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment110 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorEli Lilly and CompanyClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, DyslexiaClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsAtomoxetine, PlaceboClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2008-07-16ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2022-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov
Other registries' IDseudract:2019-000419-98ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2018-02-07ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 83

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)Baseline, 16 WeeksChange From Baseline in Task-related Brain Activity During Biological Motion Recognition Task (Task-based fMRI) BOLD response (Blood-oxygen-level-dependent response)ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Stroop Attention Tasks)Baseline, 16 WeeksChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Stroop Attention Tasks)ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + Dyslexia (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category Tasks)Baseline, 16 WeeksChange From Baseline in Task-related Brain Activity During Biological Motion Recognition Task (Task-based fMRI) BOLD response (Blood-oxygen-level-dependent response)ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + Dyslexia (Stroop Tasks)Baseline, 16 WeeksChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + Dyslexia (Stroop Tasks)ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version (ADHDRS) Total Score in the ADHD or ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 weeks
The ADHDRS-IV-Parent is an 18-item scale with 1 item for each of the 18 symptoms contained in the DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD. Each item is scored on a 0 to 3 scale: 0=none (never or rarely); 1=mild (sometimes); 2=moderate (often); 3=severe (very often). Total scores range from 0-54. Higher scores indicate higher impairment and lower scores indicate no impairment. LS mean was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based, MMRM analysis which includes treatment, baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline-by-visit interaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ III) Word Attack Total Score in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 Weeks
WJ III (Woodcock et al. 2001) has two parallel forms (A and B) alternating two batteries of tests-Standard and Extended. Standard tests (1 -12) have a broad set of scores. Extended tests (13 -22) have a more in-depth diagnostic assessment of academic strengths and weaknesses. Tests administered were 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 17, and 20. The standard score scale is a mean (M) of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. The WJ III ACH has extended standard scores which is a greater range of standard scores. Test 13, Word Attack, measures skill in applying phonic, structural analysis to the pronunciation of unfamiliar printed words. Each individual test scores range from 0 to over 200 where 69 and below is very low and 131 and above is very superior. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. Least Square (LS) Mean was analyzed using last observation carried forward (LOCF), fixed-effects analysis of covariate (ANCOVA) models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Basic Reading Skills Cluster WJ III in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 Weeks
WJ III (Woodcock et al. 2001) has two parallel forms (A and B) alternating two batteries of tests-Standard and Extended. The standard score scale is a mean (M) of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. Basic Reading Skills is an aggregate measure of sight vocabulary, phonics, and structural analysis. It is a combination of Test 1, Letter-Word Identification, which measures the participant's word identification skills, and Test 13, Word Attack, which measures skill in applying phonic and structural analysis skills to the pronunciation of unfamiliar printed words. It is the average (arithmetic mean) of the tests 1 and 13. Scores for each individual test range from 0 to over 200 where 69 and below is very low and 131 and above is very superior. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in BADD-A Total Score in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 Weeks
The BADD-A is used to assess impairment in executive functions related to ADHD. These include 1) Organizing, prioritizing, and activating to work; 2) Focusing, sustaining and shifting attention to tasks; 3) Regulating alertness, sustaining effort, and processing speed; 4) Managing frustration and modulating emotions; 5) Utilizing working memory and accessing recall (Brown 2001). Scores range from 0-120. The higher the score the more severe the attention-deficit disorder (ADD). 0-39 equate to, "ADD possible but not likely". 40-54 equate to, "ADD probable but not certain". 55-120 equate to, "ADD highly probable". LS mean was calculated using a REML-based, MMRM analysis which includes treatment, baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline-by-visit interaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in WJ III Individual Test Scores in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 Weeks
WJ III (Woodcock et al. 2001) has two parallel forms (A and B) alternating two batteries of tests-Standard and Extended. Standard tests (1 -12) have a broad set of scores. Extended tests (13 -22) have a more in-depth diagnostic assessment of academic strengths and weaknesses. Tests administered were 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 17, and 20. The standard score scale is a mean (M) of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. The WJ III ACH has extended standard scores, which is a greater range of standard scores. Scores for each individual test range from 0 to over 200 where 69 and below is very low and 131 and above is very superior. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in WJ III Individual Test Scores in Participants With ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 Weeks
WJ III (Woodcock et al. 2001) has two parallel forms (A and B) alternating two batteries of tests-Standard and Extended. Standard tests (1 -12) have a broad set of scores. Extended tests (13 -22) have a more in-depth diagnostic assessment of academic strengths and weaknesses. Tests administered were 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 17, and 20. The standard score scale is a mean (M) of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. The WJ III ACH has extended standard scores, which is a greater range of standard scores. Scores for each individual test range from 0 to over 200 where 69 and below is very low and 131 and above is very superior. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in WJ III Individual Test Scores in Participants With ADHD AloneBaseline, 16 Weeks
WJ III (Woodcock et al. 2001) has two parallel forms (A and B) alternating two batteries of tests-Standard and Extended. Standard tests (1 -12) have a broad set of scores. Extended tests (13 -22) have a more in-depth diagnostic assessment of academic strengths and weaknesses. Tests administered were 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 17, and 20. The standard score scale is a mean (M) of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. The WJ III ACH has extended standard scores, which is a greater range of standard scores. Scores for each individual test range from 0 to over 200 where 69 and below is very low and 131 and above is very superior. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP) Composite Scores in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 weeks
The CTOPP assesses phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming and is appropriate for ages 7 to 24. The test contains six core subtests. The composite scores are 1) Phonological Awareness, comprised of the standard scores of the Elision and Blending Words; 2) Phonological Memory, comprised of standard scores for Memory for Digits and Non-word Repetition; and 3) Rapid Naming, comprised of standard scores for Rapid Digit Naming and Rapid Letter Naming. Standard scores range from 1-20, and composite scores range from 35-165. Higher scores are better and lower scores are poor. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in CTOPP Composite Score in Participants With ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 weeks
The CTOPP assesses phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming and is appropriate for ages 7 to 24. The test contains six core subtests. The composite scores are 1) Phonological Awareness, comprised of the standard scores of the Elision and Blending Words; 2) Phonological Memory, comprised of standard scores for Memory for Digits and Non-word Repetition; and 3) Rapid Naming, comprised of standard scores for Rapid Digit Naming and Rapid Letter Naming. Standard scores range from 1-20, and composite scores range from 35-165. Higher scores are better and lower scores are poor. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in CTOPP Composite Score in Participants With ADHD AloneBaseline, 16 weeks
The CTOPP assesses phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming and is appropriate for ages 7 to 24. The test contains six core subtests. The composite scores are 1) Phonological Awareness, comprised of the standard scores of the Elision and Blending Words; 2) Phonological Memory, comprised of standard scores for Memory for Digits and Non-word Repetition; and 3) Rapid Naming, comprised of standard scores for Rapid Digit Naming and Rapid Letter Naming. Standard scores range from 1-20, and composite scores range from 35-165. Higher scores are better and lower scores are poor. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Gray Oral Reading Tests-4 (GORT-4) in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 weeks
The GORT-4 is a norm-referenced test of oral reading rate, accuracy, fluency, and comprehension valid for individuals aged 6 to 18 years old. The test has two parallel forms, Form A and Form B, that are administered in an alternating fashion (e.g. Week 0-Form A, Week 16-Form B, Week 32-Form A.) with each containing 14 separate stories and 5 multiple-choice comprehension questions for each story. GORT-4 yields the following scores: rate, accuracy, fluency, comprehension, and overall reading ability. Standard scores range from 1-20. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. Lower scores indicate poor reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models of with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in GORT-4 in Participants With ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 weeks
The GORT-4 is a norm-referenced test of oral reading rate, accuracy, fluency, and comprehension valid for individuals aged 6 to 18 years old. The test has two parallel forms, Form A and Form B, that are administered in an alternating fashion (e.g. Week 0-Form A, Week 16-Form B, Week 32-Form A.) with each containing 14 separate stories and 5 multiple-choice comprehension questions for each story. GORT-4 yields the following scores: rate, accuracy, fluency, comprehension, and overall reading ability. Standard scores range from 1-20. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. Lower scores indicate poor reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms of treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in GORT-4 in Participants With ADHD AloneBaseline, 16 weeks
The GORT-4 is a norm-referenced test of oral reading rate, accuracy, fluency, and comprehension valid for individuals aged 6 to 18 years old. The test has two parallel forms, Form A and Form B, that are administered in an alternating fashion (e.g. Week 0-Form A, Week 16-Form B, Week 32-Form A.) with each containing 14 separate stories and 5 multiple-choice comprehension questions for each story. GORT-4 yields the following scores: rate, accuracy, fluency, comprehension, and overall reading ability. Standard scores range from 1-20. Higher scores indicate better reading skills. Lower scores indicate poor reading skills. LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms of treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) Total Score in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 Weeks
The TOWRE is a measure of an individual's ability to pronounce printed words accurately and fluently and is appropriate for individuals aged 6 to 24 years old. The TOWRE contains two subtests: Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) which assesses the number of real printed words that can be accurately identified within 45 seconds and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE) which measures the number of pronounceable printed non-words that can be accurately decoded within 45 seconds. The total standard score ranges from 35-165. Higher scores indicate higher reading proficiency and lower scores indicate lower reading proficiency. LS mean was calculated using a REML-based, MMRM analysis which includes treatment, baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline-by-visit interaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in TOWRE Total Score in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 Weeks
The TOWRE is a measure of an individual's ability to pronounce printed words accurately and fluently and is appropriate for individuals aged 6 to 24 years old. The TOWRE contains two subtests: Sight Word Efficiency (SWE) which assesses the number of real printed words that can be accurately identified within 45 seconds and Phonemic Decoding Efficiency (PDE) which measures the number of pronounceable printed non-words that can be accurately decoded within 45 seconds. The total standard score ranges from 35-165. Higher scores indicate higher reading proficiency and lower scores indicate lower reading proficiency. LS mean was calculated using a REML-based, MMRM analysis which includes treatment, baseline, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline-by-visit interaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C) in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 Weeks
WMTB-C is assessment of working memory capacities, consisting of 9 subtests (Trials Correct Scores \[Range from 55-145\], Higher scores are better, Lower scores are poor) reflecting 3 main components of working memory: central executive (CE) control/regulation of working memory (Backward Digit Recall, Listening Recall, Counting Recall); phonological loop (PL) responsible for holding verbal information for short periods (Digit Recall, Word List Matching, Word List Recall, Non-word List Recall); and visuo-spatial sketchpad (VSSP) which holds information in visual and spatial form (Block Recall, Mazes Memory). LS mean was analyzed using LOCF, fixed-effects ANCOVA models with terms for treatment, gender, baseline, age, treatment\*baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 83

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)Baseline, 16 WeeksAll participants who received study drug, had Dyslexia Alone and had fMRI data.Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)MEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Stroop Attention Tasks)Baseline, 16 WeeksStroop Tasks data were not collected.ClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + Dyslexia (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category Tasks)Baseline, 16 WeeksAll participants who received study drug, had ADHD or ADHD + Dyslexia and had fMRI data.Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)MEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in fMRI Activation in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + Dyslexia (Stroop Tasks)Baseline, 16 WeeksStroop Tasks data were not collected.ClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version (ADHDRS) Total Score in the ADHD or ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline ADHDRS-IV-Parent: Inv measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ III) Word Attack Total Score in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline WJ III measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Basic Reading Skills Cluster WJ III in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline WJ III measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in BADD-A Total Score in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline BADD-A measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in WJ III Individual Test Scores in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who had a WJ III baseline and post-baseline measurement.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in WJ III Individual Test Scores in Participants With ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who had a baseline and post-baseline WJ III measurement.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in WJ III Individual Test Scores in Participants With ADHD AloneBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who had a baseline and post-baseline WJ III measurement.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP) Composite Scores in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline CTOPP measurements.units on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in CTOPP Composite Score in Participants With ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline CTOPP measurements.units on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in CTOPP Composite Score in Participants With ADHD AloneBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline CTOPP measurements.units on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Gray Oral Reading Tests-4 (GORT-4) in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline GORT-4 measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in GORT-4 in Participants With ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline GORT-4 measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in GORT-4 in Participants With ADHD AloneBaseline, 16 weeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline GORT-4 measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) Total Score in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline TOWRE measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in TOWRE Total Score in Participants With ADHD or ADHD + DyslexiaBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline TOWRE measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C) in Participants With Dyslexia AloneBaseline, 16 WeeksAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable baseline and post baseline WMTB-C measurements.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEANClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 613

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus-0.056Standard Deviation 0.125Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus-0.033Standard Deviation 0.118Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Left Interior Temporal Gyrus-0.061Standard Deviation 0.120Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Left Interior Temporal Gyrus0.010Standard Deviation 0.075Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Left Medial Temporal Gyrus-0.038Standard Deviation 0.153Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Left Medial Temporal Gyrus-0.006Standard Deviation 0.053Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Left Temporo-parietal Region-0.073Standard Deviation 0.124Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Left Temporo-parietal Region-0.037Standard Deviation 0.100Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus0.019Standard Deviation 0.156Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus0.018Standard Deviation 0.147Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Right Interior Temporal Gyrus0.002Standard Deviation 0.217Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Right Interior Temporal Gyrus0.058Standard Deviation 0.161Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Right Medial Temporal Gyrus-0.014Standard Deviation 0.181Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Right Medial Temporal Gyrus0.071Standard Deviation 0.091Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetineSemantic-category: Right Temporo-parietal Region-0.015Standard Deviation 0.145Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboSemantic-category: Right Temporo-parietal Region0.076Standard Deviation 0.114Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetinePseudoword Rhyming: Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus0.012Standard Deviation 0.200Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboPseudoword Rhyming: Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus0.020Standard Deviation 0.147Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)AtomoxetinePseudoword Rhyming: Left Interior Temporal Gyrus-0.062Standard Deviation 0.200Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Activation in Participants With Dyslexia Alone (Pseudoword Rhyming and Semantic-category)PlaceboPseudoword Rhyming: Left Interior Temporal Gyrus-0.003Standard Deviation 0.109Change-from-baseline (BOLD response)ClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 36

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Study Period II (16-Weeks)STARTEDAtomoxetine45ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo44ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)STARTEDATX/ATX0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)STARTEDATX/PLA0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)STARTEDPLA/ATX0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)STARTEDHealthy Participants21ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)COMPLETEDAtomoxetine36ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)COMPLETEDPlacebo35ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)COMPLETEDATX/ATX0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)COMPLETEDATX/PLA0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)COMPLETEDPLA/ATX0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)COMPLETEDHealthy Participants19ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDAtomoxetine9ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo9ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDATX/ATX0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDATX/PLA0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDPLA/ATX0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period II (16-Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDHealthy Participants2ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period III (16-Weeks)STARTEDAtomoxetine0ClinicalTrials.gov
Study Period III (16-Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo0ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 195

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersAtomoxetine0450ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo4444ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersATX/ATX0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersATX/PLA0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPLA/ATX2352ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersAtomoxetine104510ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo124412ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersATX/ATX0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersATX/PLA0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPLA/ATX4354ClinicalTrials.gov
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersAtomoxetine0450ClinicalTrials.gov
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1441ClinicalTrials.gov
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersATX/ATX0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersATX/PLA1181ClinicalTrials.gov
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPLA/ATX0350ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAtomoxetine7457ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5445ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersATX/ATX0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersATX/PLA0180ClinicalTrials.gov
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPLA/ATX1351ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse event totals 15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityAtomoxetineClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityPlaceboClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityATX/ATXClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityATX/PLAClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityPLA/ATXClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsAtomoxetine3545ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3144ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsATX/ATX818ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsATX/PLA818ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsPLA/ATX2535ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsAtomoxetine045ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo044ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsATX/ATX018ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsATX/PLA018ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsPLA/ATX035ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Atomoxetine vs Placebo: The Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) in Participants With DyslexiaTrial comparisons

Tests 2

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Biological Motion TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)