ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00723450

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)From randomization until Week 36
TOBE was defined by the first prescription of any additional pharmacotherapy to treat bipolar symptoms, increasing the dose(s) of the participants conventional bipolar medication(s), treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, or moving the participant to a more restricted environment for observation, safety, or treatment; or participant withdrawal from the study due to a bipolar-related adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE); or participants withdrawal from the study due to lack of efficacy as defined by rating scale threshold scores. TOBE was calculated using a log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)From randomization until withdrawal from the study for any cause (up to Week 36)The time from randomization to the withdrawal from study was analyzed. TTW was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)From randomization until intervention administered for a mood episode (up to Week 36)
The time from randomization to the intervention for a mood episode (depression, mania/hypomania or mixed mood) was analyzed. TIME was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
SecondaryTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)From randomization until intervention administered for depression, mania/hypomania or a mixed episode (up to Week 36)
The time from randomization to intervention for depression (TIDep), mania/hypomania (TIMan), or a mixed episode (TIMix) was analyzed. TIDep, TIMan, and TIMix were calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateFrom randomization until a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state (up to Week 36)
The number of participants requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state were analyzed.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseFrom randomization up to Week 36
The proportion of participants (par.) requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms, that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state at any time within the first 30, 90, and 180 days in the Randomized Phase were analyzed.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18
The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36
The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18
The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36
The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondarySummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP (I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondarySummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseRandomization weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Secondary
Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label Phase
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18
The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: "Compared to the Baseline assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?". Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).
Secondary
Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized Phase
Randomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36
The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: "Compared to the Randomization assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?". Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18
The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36
The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18
The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
SecondaryChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36
The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00723450/registered