Trial · NCT00752726
Effect of Orlistat in Body Composition
NCT00752726, Phase 4, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2013-02-07
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Effect of Orlistat in Body Composition. Trials, record NCT00752726. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00752726
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Effect of Orlistat in Body Composition
- NCT number
- NCT00752726
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 131 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Conditions
- Obesity, Overweight
- Interventions
- Orlistat, Placebo
- First posted
- 2008-09-15
- Last updated
- 2013-03-08
- Results first posted
- 2013-02-07
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes11
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Baseline to week 24 | VAT was measured by the computed tomography (CT) scan. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Baseline to week 12 | Abdominal VAT mass from baseline to week 12 was measured by CT scan. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Body Weight | Baseline to week 24 | Participants were weighed at least twice until two consecutive measurements were within 0.5 kg of each other and the average of the two measurements was recorded. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Fat Mass | Baseline to week 24 | Change in total fat mass was calculated from an average of three measurements at each visit from Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EchoMRI). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage Body Fat | Baseline to week 24 | Body fat was assessed through Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Waist Circumference | Baseline to week 24 | Waist circumference was measured against the skin, without interference from clothing, at the level midway between the lateral lower rib margin and the iliac crest in standing position. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage Liver Fat | Baseline to week 24 | For Liver fat, Intrahepatic lipids (IHL) were measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Liver Fat | Baseline to week 24 | The liver fat was measured by CT scan in Hounsfield Units (HU). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Calories Expended for Physical Activity | Baseline to week 24 | Measurement of physical activity from Paffenbarger questionnaire. The number of caloried expended was representation of activity level: Higher calorie counts indicate higher activity |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores. | Baseline to week 24 | QoL scores were measured using an Impact of Weight Quality of Life (IWQoL) Questionnaire, which scored the responses at a scale of 1 to 5(1, never true, to 5, always true): QoL scales for physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work were evaluated, and summarized in a total score. A higher value indicated a better quality of life. |
1 to 10 of 11Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 11 registered outcomesOutcomes11
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | kg | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Baseline to week 12 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | kg | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Body Weight | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | kg | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Fat Mass | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | kg | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage Body Fat | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Percentage (%) body fat | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Waist Circumference | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | cm | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage Liver Fat | Baseline to week 24 | ITT subset (participants who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment) from one study site was analysed for this parameter. | Percentage (%) IHL | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Liver Fat | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Hounsfield Units (HU) | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Calories Expended for Physical Activity | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Kilocalorie (kcal)/week | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores. | Baseline to week 24 | This analysis was carried out for the observed ITT population, i.e. ITT subjects who had this post-baseline efficacy assessment. | Score on a Scale | MEAN |
1 to 10 of 11Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 11 outcomesResults by group21
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Orlistat 60 mg | -0.630 | Standard Deviation 0.6887 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Placebo | -0.403 | Standard Deviation 0.7249 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Orlistat 60 mg | -0.496 | Standard Deviation 0.4943 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Abdominal VAT Mass | Placebo | -0.351 | Standard Deviation 0.5904 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Body Weight | Orlistat 60 mg | -5.96 | Standard Deviation 4.743 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Body Weight | Placebo | -3.91 | Standard Deviation 5.375 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Fat Mass | Orlistat 60 mg | -4.69 | Standard Deviation 3.691 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Fat Mass | Placebo | -3.16 | Standard Deviation 4.248 | kg | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage Body Fat | Orlistat 60 mg | -1.70 | Standard Deviation 3.434 | Percentage (%) body fat | |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Percentage Body Fat | Placebo | -0.38 | Standard Deviation 4.232 | Percentage (%) body fat |
1 to 10 of 21Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 21 results by groupParticipant flow10
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Orlistat 60 Milligram (mg) | 65 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 66 | |
| Overall Study | Safety Population | Orlistat 60 Milligram (mg) | 63 | |
| Overall Study | Safety Population | Placebo | 64 | |
| Overall Study | Intention to Treat (ITT) Population | Orlistat 60 Milligram (mg) | 62 | |
| Overall Study | Intention to Treat (ITT) Population | Placebo | 61 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Orlistat 60 Milligram (mg) | 54 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 53 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Orlistat 60 Milligram (mg) | 11 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo | 13 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events42
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Fatty/oily stool | Gastrointestinal disorders | Orlistat 60 mg | 22 | 63 | 36 |
| other | Fatty/oily stool | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo | 3 | 64 | 4 |
| other | Soft stools | Gastrointestinal disorders | Orlistat 60 mg | 14 | 63 | 17 |
| other | Soft stools | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo | 8 | 64 | 10 |
| other | Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | Orlistat 60 mg | 12 | 63 | 16 |
| other | Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo | 5 | 64 | 6 |
| other | Liquid stools | Gastrointestinal disorders | Orlistat 60 mg | 7 | 63 | 8 |
| other | Liquid stools | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo | 5 | 64 | 5 |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Orlistat 60 mg | 2 | 63 | 2 |
| other | Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | Placebo | 6 | 64 | 8 |
1 to 10 of 42Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 42 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Orlistat 60 mg | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Orlistat 60 mg | 57 | 63 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 52 | 64 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Orlistat 60 mg | 2 | 63 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 1 | 64 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 21720429 | BACKGROUND |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons1
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison |
|---|
| Orlistat 60 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse events |
Source Trial comparisons
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00752726
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00752726/results?page=2