ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00759876

Phase 2a Extension Study of Ataluren (PTC124) in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

NCT00759876, Phase 2, Terminated, PTC Therapeutics; results first posted 2020-10-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase 2a Extension Study of Ataluren (PTC124) in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Trials, record NCT00759876. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00759876

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Phase 2a Extension Study of Ataluren (PTC124) in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
NCT number
NCT00759876
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
36 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
PTC Therapeutics
Conditions
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Interventions
Ataluren
First posted
2008-09-25
Last updated
2020-10-29
Results first posted
2020-10-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to Week 89
TEAE: any untoward medical occurrence or undesirable event(s) that begins or worsens following administration of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the treatment by the Investigator. Severity of an adverse event (AE) was classified as: mild (does not interfere with usual function), moderate (interferes with usual function; may require medical intervention), severe (interferes significantly with usual function; likely require medical intervention), life-threatening, and fatal. Drug-related AEs: AEs with a possible or probable relationship to study drug. Serious AEs: death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60
The 6MWD was assessed in participants who were ambulatory using standardized procedures. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices during the 6MWD test. Only the results of the participant's best valid test at each visit were included in the analysis. The mean change from baseline in the distance the participant walked is reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
Timed function tests included time to stand from supine position (rise to standing), time to run/walk 10 meters (m), and time to ascend/descend 4 stairs. Timed function tests were assessed in ambulatory participants. A decrease from baseline reflects faster completion of the functional task and, thus, better muscle function. If the time taken to perform a test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform the test due to disease progression (PD), a value of 30 seconds was used. Test results were set to missing in the analysis for participants who could not perform the tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used for standing from supine position: 1) Unable to stand from supine, even with use of a chair. 2) Assisted Gowers, requires furniture to rise from supine to full upright posture. 3) Full Gowers, rolls over, stands with both hands "climbing up" legs to above knees to achieve full upright posture. 4) Half Gowers, rolls over, stands up with 1 hand support on lower legs. 5) Rolls to side and/or stands with 1 or both hands on floor to start to rise but does not touch legs. 6) Stands without rolling over or using hands. Increases from baseline are indicative of improving ability to perform functional task. If a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of "1" was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to run/walk 10-meters: 1) Unable to walk independently. 2) Unable to walk independently but can walk with knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) or with support from a person 3) Highly adapted, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed. 4) Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run. 5) Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground). 6) Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double-stance phase). At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of "1" was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to ascend 4 stairs: 1) Unable to climb 4 standard stairs. 2) Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs 1 foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on 1 or both handrails. 3) Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" using 1 arm on 1 handrail. 4) Climbs 4 standard stairs "marking time" not needing handrail. 5) Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support. 6) Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of "1" was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
Timed test evaluations included scoring of method that ambulatory participants used to complete test. Scale for method used to descend 4 stairs: 1) Unable to descend 4 standard stairs. 2) Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time" (climbs 1 foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on 1 or both handrails. 3) Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", using 1 arm on 1 handrail. 4) Descends 4 standard stairs "marking time", not needing handrail. 5) Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet in both directions, needs handrail for support. 6) Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. At the visit, if a participant could not perform a timed function test because of PD, a method value of "1" was assigned in analysis. Test results set to missing in analysis for participants who could not perform tests for reasons other than PD (for example, bone fracture).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryBaseline, Week (Wk) 48 and Wk 60
Upper extremity myometry was performed using a hand-held dynamometer following standardized procedures. With this system, evaluators judged the strength of each muscle using an 11-point descriptive scoring system. From the individual muscle-group scores, a total composite score was derived. Bilateral assessments were done, and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side, when possible. The best of the 3 replicates was used in the analysis. An increase from Baseline is reflective of increased muscle strength, whereas a decrease from Baseline is reflective of decreased muscle strength. Participants who became unable to perform a myometry test because of disease progression were assigned a value of 0 for each visit at which the participant was no longer able to perform the test. Test results were set to missing in the analysis for participants who could not perform the tests for reasons other than disease progression (for example, bone fracture).
SecondaryChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60
Heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rate values were collected before, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position before the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was obtained and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was obtained and documented as the recovery heart rate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
The digit span task is a 2-part (forward and backward) test in which a series of digits (3 to 9) were presented to participant in an auditory format only. For forward condition, the participant was to repeat digits back in the order they were presented. For backward condition, the participant was to reverse the order of presentation. Maximum score for each part (digit forward and digit backward) of task is 14; participants received a score of 2 points if they passed both trials, score of 1 point if they passed only 1 trial, and score of 0 points if they failed both trials. A raw score of total number of correct forward and backward responses was age-normalized by subtracting corresponding mean and dividing by corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age. For each forward and backward result, the resulting Z score was transformed into percentile rank of normal distribution. Change from Baseline in number of digits recalled forward and backward is reported.

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to Week 89All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (As-Treated Population).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable 6MWT data. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
metersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Proximal Muscle Function as Assessed by Speed During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable data for the applicable timed function test. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
secondsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Standing From Supine Position as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for standing from supine. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Run/Walk 10-Meters as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for running/walking 10 meters. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Ascending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for ascending 4 stairs. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Descending 4 Stairs as Assessed by Method Scores During Timed Function TestsBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable method data for descending 4 stairs. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, Shoulder Abduction, and Hand Grip as Assessed by MyometryBaseline, Week (Wk) 48 and Wk 60All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable myometry data.poundsMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Resting, Active, and Recovery Heart Rate as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar RS400Baseline, Week 48 and Week 60
All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, were ambulatory, and had evaluable heart rate data. Participants who were ambulatory were able to walk ≥75 meters unassisted at screening.
beeps per minuteMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Verbal Memory and Attention as Assessed by the Digit Span TaskBaseline, Week 48 and Week 60All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Baseline and on-treatment data (Evaluable Population) with evaluable verbal memory and attention data.digits recalledMEAN

Results by group195

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenAt least 1 TEAE36Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenMild TEAE9Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenModerate TEAE16Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenSevere TEAE10Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenLife-Threatening TEAE1Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenFatal TEAE0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenRelated TEAE28Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AtalurenSerious TEAE6Participants
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)AtalurenBaseline367.8Standard Deviation 107.3meters
Change From Baseline in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)AtalurenChange from Baseline at Week 48-80.4Standard Deviation 59.5meters

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAtaluren36
Overall StudyAs-Treated PopulationAtaluren36
Overall StudyEvaluable PopulationAtaluren35
Overall StudyAmbulatory Evaluable PopulationAtaluren24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAtaluren0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAtaluren36

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherMyocardial fibrosisCardiac disordersAtaluren236
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersAtaluren236
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren636
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren1136
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren336
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren836
otherFlatulenceGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren1236
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren336
otherStomach discomfortGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren336
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren2436

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAtaluren
Total, other adverse eventsAtaluren3636
Total, serious adverse eventsAtaluren636

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
17389552BACKGROUNDPubMed
17450125BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Digit Span TestSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00759876

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00759876/results?page=2