ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00761280

Efficacy and Safety of AP 12009 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Secondary Glioblastoma

NCT00761280, Phase 3, Terminated, Isarna Therapeutics GmbH; results first posted 2014-08-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of AP 12009 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Secondary Glioblastoma. Trials, record NCT00761280. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00761280

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of AP 12009 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Secondary Glioblastoma
NCT number
NCT00761280
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
27 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Isarna Therapeutics GmbH
Conditions
Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Interventions
trabedersen, temozolomide, Drug delivery system for administration of AP 12009, Placement of Drug Delivery System, carmustine, lomustine
First posted
2008-09-29
Last updated
2014-11-14
Results first posted
2014-08-22
Limitations and caveats
Early termination of the study leading to recruitment of 27 of 180 planned subjects and incomplete collection of data. Survival results are based on post-study collection of additional survival data under a protocol amendment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySurvival Rate at 24 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)24 months
Survival rate was defined as the proportion of participants known to be alive at 24 months from randomization. If a participant's status was unknown and there was no follow-up information available, they were categorized as 'Died' for the purposes of the analysis.
PrimarySurvival at 24 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of Participants24 months
Survival status was assessed at 24 months from randomization. Participants with unknown or missing status were considered treatment failures, i.e., assumed to be dead. The category "Lost to / insufficient follow-up" includes participants who were alive at last data collection point but did not yet have enough follow-up time to reach the 24 month time point.
SecondarySurvival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)12, 18, and 21 months
Survival rate was defined as the proportion of participants known to be alive at each time-point from randomization. Participants with unknown or missing status were considered treatment failures, i.e., assumed to be dead.
SecondarySurvival at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of Participants12, 18, and 21 months
Survival status was assessed at each time-point from randomization. Participants with unknown or missing status were considered treatment failures, i.e., assumed to be dead. The category "Lost to follow-up" for each time-point includes participants who were alive at the last data collection point but did not yet have enough follow-up time to reach the time point.
SecondaryMedian Overall Survival (Days) From Randomization in the Intent-to-treat Population (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 months
Median overall survival was defined as the date of randomization to the date of death. If a participant's status was unknown and there was no follow-up information available, they were categorized as 'Died' for the purposes of the analysis. Analysis was by Kaplan-Meier estimation.
SecondaryResponse Category by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of ParticipantsUp to 24 months
Tumor response was classified based on the (neuro-)radiologist's evaluation according to the Macdonald Response Criteria for bidimensionally measurable disease as outlined below: * Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, neurologically stable or improved. * Partial Response (PR): ≥50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, neurologically stable or improved. * Progressive Disease (PD): ≥25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on MRI scans, steroids stable or increased, neurologically worse. * Stable Disease (SD): all other situations. Two qualified neuro-radiologists reviewed scans at each MRI time point, with adjudication of discrepancies by a third reviewer. Their findings and clinical information were independently reviewed by a neuro-oncologist, who made the assessment of overall response.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (CR+PR) by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 monthsOverall response rate was the proportion of participants with a best response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) observed from the start of treatment until disease progression.
SecondaryTumor Control Rate (CR+PR+SD) by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 months
Tumor control rate was defined as the proportion of participants assessed as having Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD). Participants with unknown or missing response were treated as non-responders.
SecondaryMedian Duration of Response (Days) by Independent Review (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 months
Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documentation of confirmed response (Complete Response, CR, or Partial Response, PR) to the first signs of Progressive Disease (PD), as assessed by the study neuro-oncologist. Median Duration of Response was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Censoring rules were: * at the date of randomization -- participants without baseline assessments, or for those with no post-baseline timor assessments who were discontinued for other than progressive disease or death. * at the date of last tumor assessment -- discontinuation other than PD or death, or if a new treatment was started prior to disease progression * at the date of death or last tumor assessment -- death or PD after one missed tumor assessment * at the date of last tumor assessment -- death or PD after more than one missed tumor assessment * at the date of last tumor assessment -- participants on ongoing treatment at data cut-off
SecondaryDisease Progression at 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24 Months by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of Participants10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24 months
Tumor response was classified based on the (neuro-)radiologist's evaluation: * Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, neurologically stable or improved. * Partial Response (PR): ≥50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, neurologically stable or improved. * Progressive Disease (PD): ≥25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on MRI scans, steroids stable or increased, neurologically worse. * Stable Disease (SD): all other situations. Based on clinical and imaging data, an independent neuro-oncologist made the final assessment of "Progressed" versus "Not Progressed". Participants who had MRI assessment results missing or unknown were "UNK or missing", and were treated as "Progressed" for the purposes of the calculation.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSurvival Rate at 24 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)24 months
The Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized. Early study discontinuation with site closures led to a high proportion of participants being censored or lost to follow-up in the initial analysis. Additional survival data were collected in a post-hoc fashion under a protocol amendment. These data are presented.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSurvival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)12, 18, and 21 months
The Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized. Early study discontinuation with site closures led to a high proportion of participants being censored or lost to follow-up in the initial analysis. Additional survival data were collected in a post-hoc fashion under a protocol amendment. These data are presented.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSurvival at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of Participants12, 18, and 21 months
The Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized. Early study discontinuation with site closures led to a high proportion of participants being censored or lost to follow-up in the initial analysis. Additional survival data were collected in a post-hoc fashion under a protocol amendment. These data are presented.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMedian Overall Survival (Days) From Randomization in the Intent-to-treat Population (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 months
The Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized. Early study discontinuation with site closures led to a high proportion of participants being censored or lost to follow-up in the initial analysis. Additional survival data were collected in a post-hoc fashion under a protocol amendment. These data are presented.
daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYResponse Category by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of ParticipantsUp to 24 monthsThe Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (CR+PR) by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 monthsThe Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTumor Control Rate (CR+PR+SD) by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 monthsThe Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYSurvival at 24 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of Participants24 months
The Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized. Early study discontinuation with site closures led to a high proportion of participants being censored or lost to follow-up in the initial analysis. Additional survival data were collected in a post-hoc fashion under a protocol amendment. These data are presented.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMedian Duration of Response (Days) by Independent Review (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Up to 24 monthsThe Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Progression at 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24 Months by Independent Review in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of Participants10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24 monthsThe Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized.participantsNUMBER

Results by group124

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Survival Rate at 24 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Trabedersen 10 µM28.695% Confidence Interval 11.7 to 54.6percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 24 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Chemotherapy15.495% Confidence Interval 4.3 to 42.2percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Trabedersen 10 µMSurvival rates at 12 months57.195% Confidence Interval 32.6 to 78.6percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)ChemotherapySurvival rates at 12 months53.895% Confidence Interval 29.1 to 76.8percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Trabedersen 10 µMSurvival rates at 18 months42.995% Confidence Interval 21.4 to 67.4percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)ChemotherapySurvival rates at 18 months38.595% Confidence Interval 17.7 to 64.5percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)Trabedersen 10 µMSurvival rates at 21 months35.795% Confidence Interval 16.3 to 61.2percentage of participants
Survival Rate at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Percentage of Participants (Descriptive Analysis, Only)ChemotherapySurvival rates at 21 months23.195% Confidence Interval 8.2 to 50.3percentage of participants
Survival at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of ParticipantsTrabedersen 10 µMAlive at 12 months8participants
Survival at 12, 18, and 21 Months in the Intent-to-treat Population - Number of ParticipantsChemotherapyAlive at 12 months7participants

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Randomization to First DoseSTARTEDTrabedersen 10 µM14
Randomization to First DoseSTARTEDChemotherapy13
Randomization to First DoseCatheter SurgeryTrabedersen 10 µM13
Randomization to First DoseCatheter SurgeryChemotherapy0
Randomization to First DoseFirst Dose of Study Drug / ChemotherapyTrabedersen 10 µM12
Randomization to First DoseFirst Dose of Study Drug / ChemotherapyChemotherapy11
Randomization to First DoseCOMPLETEDTrabedersen 10 µM12
Randomization to First DoseCOMPLETEDChemotherapy11
Randomization to First DoseNOT COMPLETEDTrabedersen 10 µM2
Randomization to First DoseNOT COMPLETEDChemotherapy2

Adverse events224

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersTrabedersen 10 µM7137
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersChemotherapy2112
otherPartial seizuresNervous system disordersTrabedersen 10 µM4134
otherPartial seizuresNervous system disordersChemotherapy0110
otherBrain oedemaNervous system disordersTrabedersen 10 µM3133
otherBrain oedemaNervous system disordersChemotherapy0110
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersTrabedersen 10 µM2132
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersChemotherapy1111
otherHemiparesisNervous system disordersTrabedersen 10 µM2132
otherHemiparesisNervous system disordersChemotherapy1111

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTrabedersen 10 µM
Total, all-cause mortalityChemotherapy
Total, other adverse eventsTrabedersen 10 µM1213
Total, other adverse eventsChemotherapy911
Total, serious adverse eventsTrabedersen 10 µM613
Total, serious adverse eventsChemotherapy011

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Trabedersen 10 µM vs Chemotherapy: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00761280

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00761280/results?page=2