ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00763867

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sildenafil at Improving Health Outcomes and Exercise Ability in People With Diastolic Heart Failure (The RELAX Study)

NCT00763867, Phase 3, Completed, Duke University; results first posted 2013-07-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sildenafil at Improving Health Outcomes and Exercise Ability in People With Diastolic Heart Failure (The RELAX Study). Trials, record NCT00763867. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00763867

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sildenafil at Improving Health Outcomes and Exercise Ability in People With Diastolic Heart Failure (The RELAX Study)
NCT number
NCT00763867
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
216 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Conditions
Heart Failure
Interventions
Placebo, Sildenafil
First posted
2008-10-01
Last updated
2014-07-23
Results first posted
2013-07-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes45

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryExercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakeChange from Baseline to Week 24
SecondaryExercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakeChange from Baseline to Week 12
SecondaryExercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistanceChange from Baseline to Week 126 Minute Walk Distance
SecondaryComposite Score Reflective of Clinical StatusMeasured at Week 24
Participants ranked sequentially with ranking stratified in one of three tiers based on: 1. Death (lowest tier) The person with the shortest time from randomization to death is given the lowest rank within the tier. 2. Hospitalizations due to cardiovascular or renal causes (middle tier) For patients alive, the ranking within this tier is based on time to hospitalization from randomization date. The person with the first cardiovascular or renal cause hospitalization will be given the lowest rank within the tier. 3. Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) from baseline (highest tier) The use of three tiers within the ranking reflects the greater adverse impact of death or cardiovascular hospitalization on clinical status without an arbitrary assignment as to the relative value of these events in relation to changes in quality of life. Rank order: 1-189 (higher values are better)
SecondaryExercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistanceChange from Baseline to Week 246 minute walk distance
SecondaryCardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) DurationChange from Baseline to Week 12To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
SecondaryCardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) DurationChange from Baseline to Week 24To interpret the CPET Exercise Duration change endpoints, an increase in exercise duration between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
SecondaryVentilatory Anaerobic ThresholdChange from Baseline to Week 12To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
SecondaryVentilatory Anaerobic ThresholdChange from Baseline to Week 24To interpret the Ventilatory Anaerobic Threshold (VAT) change endpoints, an increase in VAT between Baseline and Week 12/Week 24 is considered to be an improvement
SecondaryMinnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ)Change from Baseline to Week 12
The MLWHFQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure of health related quality of life (QOL) that assesses patients perceptions of the influence of heart failure on physical, socioeconomic and psychological aspects of life. Patients respond to 21 items using a six-point response scale (0-5). The total summary score can range from 0-105 with a lower score reflecting better heart failure related QOL. Two sub-scale scores reflect physical (8 items) and emotional (5 items) impairment. Total score: 0 - 105 Physical subscore: 0 - 40 Emotional subscore: 0 - 25

Outcomes45

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYExercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakeChange from Baseline to Week 24Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.ml/min/kgMEAN
SECONDARYExercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakeChange from Baseline to Week 12Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.ml/min/kgMEAN
SECONDARYExercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistanceChange from Baseline to Week 12Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.metersMEAN
SECONDARYComposite Score Reflective of Clinical StatusMeasured at Week 24Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYExercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistanceChange from Baseline to Week 24Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.metersMEAN
SECONDARYCardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) DurationChange from Baseline to Week 12Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.minutesMEAN
SECONDARYCardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) DurationChange from Baseline to Week 24Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.minutesMEAN
SECONDARYVentilatory Anaerobic ThresholdChange from Baseline to Week 12Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.ml/min/kgMEAN
SECONDARYVentilatory Anaerobic ThresholdChange from Baseline to Week 24Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.ml/min/kgMEAN
SECONDARYMinnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ)Change from Baseline to Week 12Participants analyzed consisted of those participants who had the endpoint data available to be derived.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group90

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakePlacebo-0.07Standard Deviation 2.00ml/min/kg
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakeSildenafil-0.12Standard Deviation 2.29ml/min/kg
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakePlacebo0.02Standard Deviation 1.70ml/min/kg
Exercise Capacity, as Determined by Peak Oxygen UptakeSildenafil0.03Standard Deviation 2.20ml/min/kg
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistancePlacebo26.2Standard Deviation 83.7meters
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistanceSildenafil5.2Standard Deviation 69.1meters
Composite Score Reflective of Clinical StatusPlacebo95.8Standard Deviation 55.0units on a scale
Composite Score Reflective of Clinical StatusSildenafil94.2Standard Deviation 54.6units on a scale
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistancePlacebo17.5Standard Deviation 88.6meters
Exercise Capacity as Determined by Walk DistanceSildenafil12.0Standard Deviation 94.2meters

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo103
Overall StudySTARTEDSildenafil113
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo98
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSildenafil101
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSildenafil12

Adverse events96

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAngina PectorisCardiac disordersPlacebo2103
otherAngina PectorisCardiac disordersSildenafil0113
otherAtrial FibrillationCardiac disordersPlacebo4103
otherAtrial FibrillationCardiac disordersSildenafil0113
otherAtrial FlutterCardiac disordersPlacebo1103
otherAtrial FlutterCardiac disordersSildenafil1113
otherAtrioventricular Block Second DegreeCardiac disordersPlacebo1103
otherAtrioventricular Block Second DegreeCardiac disordersSildenafil0113
otherCardiac FailureCardiac disordersPlacebo1103
otherCardiac FailureCardiac disordersSildenafil5113

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalitySildenafil
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo72103
Total, other adverse eventsSildenafil83113
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo16103
Total, serious adverse eventsSildenafil25113

Papers13

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22991405DERIVEDPubMed
23478662RESULTPubMed
24162898DERIVEDPubMed
24833648DERIVEDPubMed
25104521DERIVEDPubMed
27072860DERIVEDPubMed
28194841DERIVEDPubMed
28214792DERIVEDPubMed
31272568DERIVEDPubMed
31805424DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 13

See all 13 papers

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U01HL084904Heart Failure Clinical Research Network - DCCLEE, KERRY LDUKE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE2006 to 2011

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Sildenafil vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00763867

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00763867/registered?page=2