ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00778817

IMC-A12 With Mitotane vs Mitotane Alone in Recurrent, Metastatic, or Primary ACC That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

NCT00778817, Phase 2, Terminated, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2013-11-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. IMC-A12 With Mitotane vs Mitotane Alone in Recurrent, Metastatic, or Primary ACC That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery. Trials, record NCT00778817. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00778817

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
IMC-A12 With Mitotane vs Mitotane Alone in Recurrent, Metastatic, or Primary ACC That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT number
NCT00778817
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
20 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Stage III Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Stage IV Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Interventions
IMC-A12, mitotane
First posted
2008-10-23
Last updated
2014-04-29
Results first posted
2013-11-06
Limitations and caveats
After the treatment of 20 subjects, a protocol defined interim analysis was completed for safety and futility. The trial was permanently halted based on futility concerns.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free Survival Rate at 6 Weeks6 weeks
Progression-free survival rates were estimated at 6, 12, and 18 weeks by the Kaplan-Meier method. At a given time point, this outcome is defined as the proportion of subjects who had not progressed or died. Disease progression is defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0). Progression is characterized by a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
PrimaryProgression-free Survival Rate at 12 Weeks12 weeks
Progression-free survival rates were estimated at 6, 12, and 18 weeks by the Kaplan-Meier method. At a given time point, this outcome is defined as the proportion of subjects who had not progressed or died. Disease progression is defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0). Progression is characterized by a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
PrimaryProgression-free Survival Rate at 18 Weeks18 weeks
Progression-free survival rates were estimated at 6, 12, and 18 weeks by the Kaplan-Meier method. At a given time point, this outcome is defined as the proportion of subjects who had not progressed or died. Disease progression is defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0). Progression is characterized by a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryBest Response RatesUp to 6 months
RECIST v1.0 was used to evaluate patient response at each time point. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Subjects who were unevaluable for response were classified as having 'Unknown response'. Each patient's 'best response' was the most favorable of all recorded responses across all time points. Proportions of patients with each response as their best response are reported in this outcome.
SecondaryResponse at 6 Weeks6 weeks
RECIST v1.0 was used to evaluate patient response at each time point. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Subjects who were unevaluable for response were classified as having 'Unknown response'. Each patient's 'best response' was the most favorable of all recorded responses across all time points. Proportions of patients with each response as their best response are reported in this outcome.
SecondaryResponse at 12 Weeks12 weeks
RECIST v1.0 was used to evaluate patient response at each time point. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Subjects who were unevaluable for response were classified as having 'Unknown response'. Each patient's 'best response' was the most favorable of all recorded responses across all time points. Proportions of patients with each response as their best response are reported in this outcome.
SecondaryResponse at 18 Weeks18 weeks
RECIST v1.0 was used to evaluate patient response at each time point. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Subjects who were unevaluable for response were classified as having 'Unknown response'. Each patient's 'best response' was the most favorable of all recorded responses across all time points. Proportions of patients with each response as their best response are reported in this outcome.
SecondaryResponse at 48 Weeks48 weeks
RECIST v1.0 was used to evaluate patient response at each time point. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Subjects who were unevaluable for response were classified as having 'Unknown response'. Each patient's 'best response' was the most favorable of all recorded responses across all time points. Proportions of patients with each response as their best response are reported in this outcome.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Exhibiting Decrease in Tumor Size at 6 Weeks6 weeksTotal number of patients whose tumor size at 6 weeks was smaller than their tumor size recorded at baseline (by any amount).
SecondaryNumber of Patients Exhibiting Decrease in Tumor Size at 12 Weeks12 weeksTotal number of patients whose tumor size at 12 weeks was smaller than their tumor size recorded at baseline (by any amount).

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival Rate at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe analysis population excludes two patients who withdrew from the study before the 6 week assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival Rate at 12 Weeks12 weeksThe analysis population excludes two patients who withdrew from the study before the 6 week assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival Rate at 18 Weeks18 weeksThe analysis population excludes two patients who withdrew from the study before the 6 week assessment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYBest Response RatesUp to 6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse at 6 Weeks6 weekspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse at 12 Weeks12 weekspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse at 18 Weeks18 weekspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse at 48 Weeks48 weekspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Exhibiting Decrease in Tumor Size at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe analysis population excludes two patients who withdrew from the study before the 6 week assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Exhibiting Decrease in Tumor Size at 12 Weeks12 weeksThe analysis population excludes two patients who withdrew from the study before the 6 week assessment.participantsNUMBER

Results by group32

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 WeeksChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy50percentage of participants
Progression-free Survival Rate at 12 WeeksChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy25percentage of participants
Progression-free Survival Rate at 18 WeeksChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy16.7percentage of participants
Best Response RatesChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyProgressive disease (PD)45percentage of participants
Best Response RatesChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyStable disease (SD)40percentage of participants
Best Response RatesChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyPartial response (PR)5percentage of participants
Best Response RatesChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyComplete response (CR)0percentage of participants
Best Response RatesChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyUnknown response10percentage of participants
Response at 6 WeeksChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyProgressive disease (PD)45percentage of participants
Response at 6 WeeksChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody TherapyStable disease (SD)45percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy4

Adverse events25

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
otherFatigueGeneral disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
otherHyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy220
seriousAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
seriousAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
seriousAnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
seriousCholesterol highInvestigationsChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
seriousCognitive disturbanceNervous system disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
seriousConfusionPsychiatric disordersChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120
seriousCreatinine increasedInvestigationsChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy120

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy
Total, other adverse eventsChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy420
Total, serious adverse eventsChemotherapy and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy920

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00778817

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00778817/results?page=2