ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00784368

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMaximum Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (Cmax)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe Cmax is defined as the maximum observed analyte concentration. Cmax was measured in microgram per milliliter (mcg/ml).
PrimaryArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-dose Observed Plasma Itraconazole Concentration (AUC[0-24])Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
The AUC(0-24) is area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours post-dose. It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. AUC was measured in mcg\*hour(hr) per ml.
PrimaryMinimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation.
PrimaryMaximum Plasma Drug Concentration by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Cmax/MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
The Cmax is maximum observed analyte concentration and MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The Cmax/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
PrimaryArea Under the Curve During 24 Hours by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (AUC 0-24/MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment
The AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hr). It is usually calculated by linear trapezoidal method. MIC is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits the visible growth of a microorganism after incubation. The AUC 0-24/MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
PrimaryTime Above Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (T>MIC)Day 85 for SFI (ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy); and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatmentThe T\>MIC was calculated only in participants for whom the MIC was obtained.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change in Clinical Symptoms by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Level of improvement in the clinical symptoms was assessed as: disappeared (if clinical symptoms disappeared), improved (significant improvement in clinical symptoms ), no change (almost no improvement in the clinical symptoms), worsened (if the clinical symptoms worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, chronic necrotic pulmonary aspergillosis (C.N.P.A), pulmonary aspergilloma (P.A.) and pulmonary cryptococcosis (P.C).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Response by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Efficacy rate (E.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. Treatment success rate (T.S.R.) was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Response by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
E.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective and number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective multiplied by 100. T.S.R. was calculated as number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective divided by sum of number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be effective, number of cases for whom treatment was judged to be ineffective and number of cases for whom the efficacy could not be assessed multiplied by 100.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared (if results for pathogenic fungus became negative, or if it was not possible to obtain the appropriate specimens), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), no change (if there was no quantitative change in pathogenic fungus), increased (if there was a quantitative increase in pathogenic fungus, if results for pathogenic fungus became positive after start of dosing or if new pathogenic fungus was identified) , could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above assessment due to lack of detection in tests).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Mycological Efficacy by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Mycological efficacy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, no change, increased, could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serological Effect Against Fungi by Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), no change (if there was no change in the test values) , worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serologic Effect Against Fungi by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Serological effect against fungi was assessed as changed to negative (if the test values became negative), improved (if the test values decreased), no change (if there was no change in the test values), worsened (if the test values increased) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing). The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change In the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis By Centralized AssessmentBaseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI and FN Switched treatment)
Level of Improvement in the Endoscopy or Image diagnosis was assessed as disappeared (if the abnormal findings were normalized), decreased (if level of pathogenic fungus was decreased in culture), improved (if significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), no change (if no significant improvement was observed in the abnormal findings), worsened (if the abnormal findings were worsened) and could not be assessed (if it was difficult to make the above-noted assessments due to a reason such as a lack of detection in the tests before and after dosing).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change in the Endoscopy or Image Diagnosis by Diagnosis Name (Centralized Assessment)Baseline up to end of treatment (Day 85 for SFI [ITCZ Oral Solution Monotherapy] and Day 99 for SFI Switched treatment)
Level of Improvement in Endoscopy was assessed as disappeared, decreased, improved, no change, worsened and could not be assessed. The cases evaluated were candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, C.N.P.A, P.A. and P.C.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00784368/registered