ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00785577

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
This scale measured 24-hour APS scores. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Night Pain Severity Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
This scale measured night pain APS scores. Data were recorded daily on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain Severity Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
This scale measured worst pain APS scores. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 30% Reduction in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Severity (APS) ScoreBaseline through 5 weeks
This scale measured the number of participants with a 30% reduction in weekly mean 24-hour APS score from baseline to endpoint. Data were recorded daily (preferably at bedtime) on an 11-point Likert scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Average Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI-I) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
Average BPI-I measured self-reported degree of pain interference on function. Interference scores: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) on each question assessing interference of pain in past 24 hours for general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Average interference = average of non-missing scores of individual interference items. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Severity (BPI-S) Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
BPI-S measured self-reported severity of pain. Severity scores: 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) on each question assessing worst pain, least pain, and average pain in past 24 hours, and current pain. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
CGI-S measured severity of illness at the time of assessment compared with start of treatment. Scores ranged from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score at 5 WeeksWeek 5
PGI-I measured the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Subscale Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
SF-MPQ consisted of 11 sensory descriptors describing pain that were rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores were derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory descriptors. The SF-MPQ sensory subscale was the sum of the 11 scores (ranged from 0 to 33, with 33 being the worst). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Assessment of Sleep Questionnaire (ASQ) Total Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
ASQ consisted of 21 items (including a single item to assess overall sleep quality) and 3 subscales: Sleep Onset and Maintenance (items 1-3, 5-6, 9, 11); Sleep Experience (items 4, 7, 8, 10, 12); and Awakening Experience (items 13-20). Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no sleep at all) to 5 (a lot of sleep). Each subscale was calculated as the mean of the individual items comprising the subscale. A total ASQ score was calculated as the mean of the subscale scores; higher scores represent better sleep.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropathy-Specific Quality of Life (NeuroQoL) Questionnaire Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
NeuroQoL had 29 items: 13 assessed specific somatic experiences (pain, lost/reduced feeling, and diffuse sensory-motor symptoms); 14 assessed specific functional, social, and emotional experiences (restrictions in daily living activities, disruptions in social relationships, and emotional distress); 2 items assessed QoL and overall satisfaction. Items reported on a 5-point scale (never/not at all to all of the time/very much). Higher mean scores=more severe symptoms/greater disruption in functioning. First 27 items also associate with 3-point bothersome/importance scale (1=none to 3=very).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
The SF-36 Health Status Survey was a generic, health-related scale assessing participants' quality of life on 8 domains (physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health, role-physical, role-emotional and general health) and 2 summary scores (mental component summary \[MCS\] and physical component summary \[PCS\]). MCS and PCS scores=0-100 (higher scores indicate better health status). Domain scores: general health=5-25; physical functioning=10-30; role-physical=4-8; role-emotional=3-6; social functioning=2-10; bodily pain=2-11; vitality=4-24; mental health=5-30.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of European Quality of Life Scale - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at 5 Weeks: United States Population Based Index ScoreBaseline, 5 weeks
The EQ-5D was a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood. A single score between 1 and 3 was generated for each domain. For each participant, the outcome rating on the 5 domains was mapped to a single index through an algorithm. The index ranged between 0 and 1, with the higher score indicating a better health state perceived by the participant.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Impairment Score at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
The SDS was completed by the participant and was used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on work/social/family life. Total scores ranged from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Therapy (Double-blind) Phase and 1-Week Washout (Follow-up) PhaseBaseline through 6 weeks
Participant discontinuation in the study due to serious and other non-serious AEs was measured during both the therapy (double-blind) phase and 1-week washout (follow-up) phase. A listing of serious and other non-serious AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Treatment Emergent Abnormal High or Low Laboratory ValuesBaseline through 5 weeks
The number of participants by treatment group who had abnormal high or low laboratory values was reported by the investigator and summarized as serious adverse events (SAEs) from the "Investigations" system organ class during the treatment phase of the study. A listing of SAEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeks
Participants' systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate at 5 WeeksBaseline, 5 weeksPulse rate was measured in beats per minute (bpm). LS Means were adjusted for baseline, investigator, treatment, visit, a treatment-by-visit interaction, and a baseline-by-visit interaction.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram Change in Heart Rate Using Bazett's (QTcB) and Fridericia's (QTcF) FormulasBaseline through 5 weeksThe number of participants having QTcF and QTcB change ≥ 30 msec was summarized.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Reported Hypoglycemic EventsBaseline through 5 weeks
Percentage of participants who reported hypoglycemic (lower than normal level of blood glucose) episodes was summarized as other non-serious adverse events (AEs) from the "Investigations" system organ class (preferred term = hypoglycemia). A listing of AEs is located in the Reported Adverse Event module.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00785577/registered