ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00787254

Efficacy and Safety of Lansoprazole on Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers in Patients Taking Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

NCT00787254, Phase 3, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2011-05-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Lansoprazole on Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers in Patients Taking Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Trials, record NCT00787254. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00787254

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Lansoprazole on Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers in Patients Taking Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
NCT number
NCT00787254
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
366 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Conditions
Stomach Ulcer, Duodenal Ulcer
Interventions
Lansoprazole, Gefarnate
First posted
2008-11-07
Last updated
2012-02-03
Results first posted
2011-05-10
Limitations and caveats
This study was prematurely discontinued due to results available from a parallel study (AG-1749-CCT-351; NCT00762359) demonstrating a preventive effect on ulcer occurrence which impacted the risk/benefit profile.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes48

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Gastric Ulcer and/or Duodenal Ulcer24 MonthsThe number of participants that developed gastric ulcer and/or duodenal ulcer at month 24 or final visit. Ulcers are defined as mucosal defect with white coating 3 mm or greater.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 3)Baseline and Month 3.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the stomach, graded on a 5 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach and \<1 lesion; 2= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach with 2-5 lesions; 3= erosion/hemorrhage in two areas in the stomach/one area involves \>6 lesions; 4= erosion/hemorrhage appear in three or more areas in the stomach). Erosions are mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 6)Baseline and Month 6.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the stomach, graded on a 5 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach and \<1 lesion; 2= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach with 2-5 lesions; 3= erosion/hemorrhage in two areas in the stomach/one area involves \>6 lesions; 4= erosion/hemorrhage appear in three or more areas in the stomach). Erosions are mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 12)Baseline and Month 12.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the stomach, graded on a 5 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach and \<1 lesion; 2= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach with 2-5 lesions; 3= erosion/hemorrhage in two areas in the stomach/one area involves \>6 lesions; 4= erosion/hemorrhage appear in three or more areas in the stomach). Erosions are mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 18)Baseline and Month 18.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the stomach, graded on a 5 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach and \<1 lesion; 2= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach with 2-5 lesions; 3= erosion/hemorrhage in two areas in the stomach/one area involves \>6 lesions; 4= erosion/hemorrhage appear in three or more areas in the stomach). Erosions are mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 24)Baseline and Month 24.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the stomach, graded on a 5 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach and \<1 lesion; 2= erosion/hemorrhage in one area of the stomach with 2-5 lesions; 3= erosion/hemorrhage in two areas in the stomach/one area involves \>6 lesions; 4= erosion/hemorrhage appear in three or more areas in the stomach). Erosions are mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of gastric mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 3)Baseline and Month 3.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the duodenum, graded on a 4 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion and hemorrhage are localized in one area of the duodenum and \< 1 lesion; 2= 2 to 5 lesions ; 3= \> 6 lesions). Erosions are defined as mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are defined as mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of duodenal mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 6)Baseline and Month 6.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the duodenum, graded on a 4 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion and hemorrhage are localized in one area of the duodenum and \< 1 lesion; 2= 2 to 5 lesions ; 3= \> 6 lesions). Erosions are defined as mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are defined as mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of duodenal mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 12)Baseline and Month 12.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the duodenum, graded on a 4 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion and hemorrhage are localized in one area of the duodenum and \< 1 lesion; 2= 2 to 5 lesions ; 3= \> 6 lesions). Erosions are defined as mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are defined as mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of duodenal mucosal injury.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 18)Baseline and Month 18.
The Lanza score (partially revised) attributes the severity of induced erosive mucosal injury in the duodenum, graded on a 4 point scale (0=normal; 1= erosion and hemorrhage are localized in one area of the duodenum and \< 1 lesion; 2= 2 to 5 lesions ; 3= \> 6 lesions). Erosions are defined as mucosal defect \< 3 mm. Ulcers are defined as mucosal defect with white coating ≥ 3 mm. Higher scores indicate greater severity of duodenal mucosal injury.

Outcomes48

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Gastric Ulcer and/or Duodenal Ulcer24 MonthsParticipants not taking investigational drug were not included.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 3)Baseline and Month 3.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 6)Baseline and Month 6.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 12)Baseline and Month 12.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 18)Baseline and Month 18.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 24)Baseline and Month 24.No test was performed when the number of cases was 5 or less. Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 3)Baseline and Month 3.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 6)Baseline and Month 6.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 12)Baseline and Month 12.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Duodenal Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 18)Baseline and Month 18.Values are from the Full Analysis Set.scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group97

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Gastric Ulcer and/or Duodenal UlcerLansoprazole 15 mg QD15participants
Number of Participants With Gastric Ulcer and/or Duodenal UlcerGefarnate 50 mg BID46participants
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 3)Lansoprazole 15 mg QD-0.114Standard Deviation 1.020scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 3)Gefarnate 50 mg BID0.429Standard Deviation 1.318scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 6)Lansoprazole 15 mg QD-0.319Standard Deviation 1.060scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 6)Gefarnate 50 mg BID0.188Standard Deviation 1.268scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 12)Lansoprazole 15 mg QD-0.231Standard Deviation 1.299scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 12)Gefarnate 50 mg BID0.048Standard Deviation 1.137scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 18)Lansoprazole 15 mg QD-0.162Standard Deviation 1.280scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Gastric Mucosal Injury Assessed by Lanza Score (Partially Revised) (Month 18)Gefarnate 50 mg BID-0.278Standard Deviation 1.227scores on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLansoprazole 15 mg QD185
Overall StudySTARTEDGefarnate 50 mg BID181
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLansoprazole 15 mg QD109
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGefarnate 50 mg BID99
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLansoprazole 15 mg QD76
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGefarnate 50 mg BID82

Adverse events92

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsLansoprazole 15 mg QD51183
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsGefarnate 50 mg BID37181
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole 15 mg QD19183
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersGefarnate 50 mg BID5181
otherReflux esophagitisGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole 15 mg QD4183
otherReflux esophagitisGastrointestinal disordersGefarnate 50 mg BID12181
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersLansoprazole 15 mg QD10183
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersGefarnate 50 mg BID10181
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsLansoprazole 15 mg QD12183
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsGefarnate 50 mg BID10181

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLansoprazole 15 mg QD
Total, all-cause mortalityGefarnate 50 mg BID
Total, other adverse eventsLansoprazole 15 mg QD83183
Total, other adverse eventsGefarnate 50 mg BID64181
Total, serious adverse eventsLansoprazole 15 mg QD29183
Total, serious adverse eventsGefarnate 50 mg BID17181

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lansoprazole 15 mg QD vs Gefarnate 50 mg BID: Number of Participants With Gastric or Duodenal Ulcer or Gastric or Duodenal Hemorrhagic Lesion (Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage)Trial comparisons
Lansoprazole 15 mg QD vs Gefarnate 50 mg BID: Number of Participants With Gastric Ulcer and/or Duodenal UlcerTrial comparisons
Lansoprazole 15 mg QD vs Gefarnate 50 mg BID: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00787254

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00787254/registered?page=2