ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00803205

Study of Ataluren (PTC124™) in Cystic Fibrosis

NCT00803205, Phase 3, Completed, PTC Therapeutics; results first posted 2020-05-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Ataluren (PTC124™) in Cystic Fibrosis. Trials, record NCT00803205. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00803205

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Ataluren (PTC124™) in Cystic Fibrosis
NCT number
NCT00803205
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
238 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
PTC Therapeutics
Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Interventions
Ataluren, Placebo
First posted
2008-12-05
Last updated
2020-05-14
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2008-003924-52
Results first posted
2020-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1)
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FEV1 at screening and randomization.
PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 48)
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FEV1 (the amount of air that can be exhaled in 1 second). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FEV1 was calculated as follows: (\[percent-predicted FEV1-Baseline percent-predicted FEV1\]/Baseline percent-predicted FEV1)\*100. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FEV1 at screening and randomization. A negative change from Baseline indicates that percent-predicted of FEV1 decreased.
SecondaryRate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 WeeksBaseline to EOT (Week 48)
A Respiratory Event Form, which collected data on various signs, symptoms, and effects for each event, was completed by the Investigator when informed by the participant of a respiratory event. Pulmonary exacerbations were assessed by using the modified Fuchs' criteria, which defines an exacerbation as a respiratory event requiring treatment with parenteral antibiotics for any 4 of the following 12 symptoms, with or without intravenous antibiotics: change in sputum; new or increased hemoptysis; increased cough; increased dyspnea; fatigue; temperature \>38°C; anorexia; sinus pain; change in sinus discharge; change in physical examination of the chest; decrease in pulmonary function by 10% or more from a previously recorded value; or radiographic changes indicative of pulmonary function. The 48-week exacerbation rate was determined by adding the weekly rates for each arm and dividing the sum by 48.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)
The frequency of awake cough was measured using the LifeShirt, which incorporates motion-sensing transducers, electrodes, a microphone, and a 3-axis accelerometer into a lightweight vest. The rate was determined by dividing the total number of coughs by 24 (the number of hours of the observation period). Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that coughing decreased.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)
The CFQ-R consists of 44 items, including generic scales of physical functioning, role functioning, vitality, health perceptions, emotional functioning, and social functioning, and CF-specific scales of respiratory and digestive symptoms, body image, eating disturbances, and treatment burden. Each domain score ranges from 1 to 4. Scores were linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health. Domain scores were calculated by using the following formula: 100 \* (sum of responses - minimum possible sum)/ (maximum possible sum - minimum possible sum). The minimum possible sum = number of questions \* 1; the maximum possible = the number of questions \* 4. Baseline was the latest, valid assessment prior to the treatment. A negative change from Baseline indicates that health has worsened. Participants may have switched age groups during the study.
SecondaryPercent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1)
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FVC at screening and randomization.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Week 48EOT (Week 48)
Spirometry was used to assess pulmonary function by measuring the percentage of predicted function, which was determined on the basis of the height value obtained at the same study visit, for FVC (the amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath). Spirometry was assessed by using current guidelines of the ATS and ERS. The percentage of change in percent-predicted of FVC was calculated as follows: ((percent-predicted FVC-Baseline percent-predicted FVC)/Baseline percent-predicted FVC)\*100. Baseline was the average of percent-predicted FVC at screening and randomization. A negative change from Baseline indicates that percent-predicted of FVC decreased.
OtherPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Baseline up to 4 Weeks Post-Treatment (Week 52) or Premature Discontinuation (PD)
A TEAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. AE severity was graded as follows: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening; Grade 5: fatal. A TEAE was considered related if in the opinion of the Investigator it was possibly or probably caused by the study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the Adverse Events module.
OtherRate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)
Study drug compliance was assessed by using a Pharmacy Subject Study Drug Accountability Log (completed by the investigational site personnel). The rate of compliance was defined as 100 \* (number of sachets taken/number of planned sachets) during the study. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date. To differentiate dose strengths while maintaining the blind, each kit had a unique kit number and had prominent lettering "A" and "B." Each kit contained 65 packets of 1 of the dose strengths (125, 250, or 1000 mg or matching placebo). Labeling for active drug and placebo was identical.
OtherRate of Study Drug Compliance by Patient-Reported DataBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)
Patient-reported data were obtained from the participant's electronic daily diary, which was completed by the participant or the caregiver. During study treatment, the electronic daily diary was to be completed by the participant or caregiver each day for each dose. For each participant, compliance is described in terms of the percentage of study drug actually taken. All calculations were based on the records of the first dose date to the last dose date. To differentiate dose strengths while maintaining the blind, each kit had a unique kit number and had prominent lettering "A" and "B." Each kit contained 65 packets of 1 of the dose strengths (125, 250, or 1000 mg or matching placebo). Labeling for active drug and placebo was identical.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of predicted FEV1MEAN
PRIMARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 48)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYRate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 WeeksBaseline to EOT (Week 48)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
exacerbationsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
coughs/hourMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Respiratory Domain Score of the Revised Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ-R) at Week 48Baseline, EOT (Week 48)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent-Predicted of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at BaselineBaseline (Week 1)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of predicted FVCMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FVC at Week 48EOT (Week 48)
The ITT Population: all randomized participants with data for FEV1 at Baseline and a minimum of 1 post-Baseline assessment before Week 8. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
percent changeMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Baseline up to 4 Weeks Post-Treatment (Week 52) or Premature Discontinuation (PD)The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percent of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDRate of Study Drug Compliance by Drug AccountabilityBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percent of doses takenMEDIAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDRate of Study Drug Compliance by Patient-Reported DataBaseline up to EOT (Week 48)The As-Treated Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.percent of doses takenMEDIAN

Results by group98

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at BaselineAtaluren62.092Standard Deviation 13.6159percentage of predicted FEV1
Percentage of Predicted Function (Percent-Predicted) of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at BaselinePlacebo60.232Standard Deviation 15.1437percentage of predicted FEV1
Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48Ataluren-2.534Standard Deviation 13.2452percent change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Percent-Predicted of FEV1 at Week 48Placebo-5.500Standard Deviation 12.5595percent change
Rate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 WeeksAtaluren1.4295% Confidence Interval 1.05 to 1.79exacerbations
Rate of Pulmonary Exacerbations as Defined by Modified Fuch's Criteria Over 48 WeeksPlacebo1.7895% Confidence Interval 1.38 to 2.17exacerbations
Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48AtalurenBaseline28.218Standard Deviation 20.2726coughs/hour
Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48PlaceboBaseline24.472Standard Deviation 16.7828coughs/hour
Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48AtalurenChange From Baseline-0.595Standard Deviation 18.3221coughs/hour
Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Hourly Rate at Week 48PlaceboChange From Baseline0.882Standard Deviation 14.3936coughs/hour

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAtaluren120
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo118
Overall StudyCompleted Week 16Ataluren107
Overall StudyCompleted Week 16Placebo113
Overall StudyCompleted Week 24Ataluren103
Overall StudyCompleted Week 24Placebo110
Overall StudyAs-Treated Population*Ataluren120
Overall StudyAs-Treated Population*Placebo118
Overall StudyITT PopulationAtaluren116
Overall StudyITT PopulationPlacebo116

Adverse events124

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren20120
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo14118
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren14120
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo11118
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren13120
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo21118
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren11120
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo7118
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAtaluren11120
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo13118

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAtaluren
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsAtaluren118120
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo115118
Total, serious adverse eventsAtaluren46120
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo50118

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24836205RESULTPubMed
36866921DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Ataluren vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00803205

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00803205/results?page=2