ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00806351

An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Serious Fungal Infection Due To Candida In Patients With A Dysfunctional Immune System

NCT00806351, Phase 3, Terminated, Pfizer; results first posted 2012-12-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Serious Fungal Infection Due To Candida In Patients With A Dysfunctional Immune System. Trials, record NCT00806351. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00806351

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Serious Fungal Infection Due To Candida In Patients With A Dysfunctional Immune System
NCT number
NCT00806351
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
21 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Fungemia, Neutropenia, Candidiasis
Interventions
Active Anidulafungin, Active Caspofungin
First posted
2008-12-10
Last updated
2012-12-20
Results first posted
2012-12-20
Limitations and caveats
Study prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment, not due to safety issues. Meaningful interpretation and comparison of treatment outcomes with caspofungin was difficult due to low number of participants (n=3) with confirmed Candida infection.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Day 10 up to Day 42
Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no signs, symptoms \[s/s\] of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (follow-up \[f/u\] culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (greater than or equal to \[≥3\] doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent(positive culture any Candida species \[sp\]), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
SecondaryGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Day 14 up to Day 56
Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
SecondaryGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit2 weeks post treatment
Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
SecondaryGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 weeks post treatment
Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
SecondaryResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVTDay 10 up to Day 42
Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
SecondaryResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOTDay 14 up to Day 56
Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
SecondaryResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit2 weeks post treatment
Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
SecondaryResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 weeks post treatment
Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
SecondaryClinical Response at Day 10Day 10
Participant counts of clinical response categorized as success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: no s/s of Candida (cure) or significant but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required (improvement). Failure: worsening of s/s of the Candida infection. Indeterminate: evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure. Participants who received fewer than 3 doses of study medication were assigned a clinical efficacy response of indeterminate.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recurrence2 and 6 weeks post treatment
Participant counts of microbiologic response of recurrence defined as any baseline Candida sp isolated following eradication, or culture data were not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Clinical failure defined as ≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida. Clinical success is resolution of s/s and no additional antifungal treatment needed.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Day 10 up to Day 42
Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) Population: participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had positive culture for Candida sp isolated from cultures obtained from a normally sterile site within 96 hours prior to treatment initiation. A global response of failure at EOIVT was carried forward programmatically to subsequent visits.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Day 14 up to Day 56MITT Population; A global response of failure at EOT was carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit2 weeks post treatment
MITT Population; subset of participants who, according to the investigator, completed therapy and participants with global response of failure at EOIVT or EOT. A global response of failure at the 2-week and 6-week visits carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits. Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 weeks post treatment
MITT Population; subset of participants who, according to the investigator, completed therapy and participants with global response of failure at EOIVT or EOT. A global response of failure at the 2-week and 6-week visits carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits. Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVTDay 10 up to Day 42
MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication. A global response of failure at EOIVT was carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOTDay 14 up to Day 56
MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication. A global response of failure at EOT was carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit2 weeks post treatment
MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication; Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data a specified time point
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 weeks post treatment
MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication; Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data a specified time point
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYClinical Response at Day 10Day 10MITT Population; Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable dataparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recurrence2 and 6 weeks post treatmentMITT PopulationparticipantsNUMBER

Results by group57

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)AnidulafunginSuccess8participants
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)CaspofunginSuccess3participants
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)AnidulafunginFailure3participants
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)CaspofunginFailure0participants
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)AnidulafunginIndeterminate0participants
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)CaspofunginIndeterminate0participants
Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)AnidulafunginSuccess8participants
Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)CaspofunginSuccess3participants
Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)AnidulafunginFailure3participants
Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)CaspofunginFailure0participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAnidulafungin15
Overall StudySTARTEDCaspofungin6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAnidulafungin10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCaspofungin2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAnidulafungin5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCaspofungin4

Adverse events244

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnidulafungin115
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCaspofungin16
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnidulafungin115
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCaspofungin06
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnidulafungin115
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCaspofungin06
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnidulafungin115
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCaspofungin06
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAnidulafungin115
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCaspofungin06

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAnidulafungin
Total, all-cause mortalityCaspofungin
Total, other adverse eventsAnidulafungin1415
Total, other adverse eventsCaspofungin56
Total, serious adverse eventsAnidulafungin515
Total, serious adverse eventsCaspofungin46

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
28459966DERIVEDPubMed
28597967DERIVEDPubMed
33891293DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin: Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVTTrial comparisons
Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin: Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOTTrial comparisons
Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin: Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitTrial comparisons
Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin: Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitTrial comparisons
Anidulafungin vs Caspofungin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00806351

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00806351/results?page=2