ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00817635

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 Compared to Placebo in Participants With Resistant Hypertension

NCT00817635, Phase 2, Completed, Novartis; results first posted 2021-06-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 Compared to Placebo in Participants With Resistant Hypertension. Trials, record NCT00817635. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00817635

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 Compared to Placebo in Participants With Resistant Hypertension
NCT number
NCT00817635
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
155 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
LCI699, Eplerenone, LCI699-matching Placebo, Eplerenone-matching Placebo
First posted
2009-01-06
Last updated
2021-06-02
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2008-007338-23
Results first posted
2021-06-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Baseline, Week 8
Arterial blood pressure (BP) determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from Baseline in MSSBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSSBP as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFBaseline, Week 8
Arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from Baseline in MSDBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSDBP as a covariate.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a MSSBP Response and MSSBP Control at Week 8, as Measured by Office Blood Pressure (OBP)Week 8
MSSBP response was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSSBP \<140 mmHg or a \>=20 mmHg reduction from baseline reduction from baseline. MSSBP control was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSSBP \<140 mmHg for non-diabetic participants and \<130mHg for diabetic participants.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a MSDBP Response and MSDBP Control at Week 8, as Measured by OBPWeek 8
MSDBP response was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSDBP \<90 mmHg or a \>=10 mmHg reduction from baseline. MSDBP control was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSDBP \<90 mmHg for non-diabetic participants and \<80mHg for diabetic participants.
SecondaryDose/Exposure BP Response Relationship of LCI699, as Measured by Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from Baseline in MSSBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSSBP as a covariate.
SecondaryDose/Exposure BP Response Relationship of LCI699, as Measured by Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
Arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from Baseline in MSDBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSDBP as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 8 LOCF, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM)Baseline, Week 8
An ABPM measured a participant's blood pressure over a 24-hour period including daytime and nighttime readings, using an automated validated monitoring device from Baseline to Week 8. The 24-hour SBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory systolic blood pressure readings for the 24-hour period. The change from Baseline in SBP was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSSBP as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 8 LOCF, as Measured by ABPMBaseline, Week 8
An ABPM measured a participant's blood pressure over a 24-hour period including daytime and nighttime readings, using an automated validated monitoring device from Baseline to Week 8. The 24-hour DBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory diastolic blood pressure readings for the 24-hour period. The change from Baseline in DBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSDBP as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime SBP in LCI699 1mg QD Versus LCI699 0.5mg BID Arm at Week 4, as Measured by ABPMBaseline, Week 4
An ABPM measured a participant's blood pressure over a 24-hour period including daytime and nighttime readings using an automated validated monitoring device from Baseline to Week 4. The 24-hour SBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory systolic blood pressure readings for the 24-hour period. The change from Baseline in SBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSDBP as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime DBP in LCI699 1mg QD Versus LCI699 0.5mg BID Arm at Week 4, as Measured by ABPMBaseline, Week 4
An ABPM measured a participant's blood pressure over a 24-hour period including daytime and nighttime readings using an automated validated monitoring device from Baseline to Week 4. The 24-hour DBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory diastolic blood pressure readings for the 24-hour period. The change from Baseline in DBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and country as factors and Baseline MSDBP as a covariate.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Baseline, Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFBaseline, Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a MSSBP Response and MSSBP Control at Week 8, as Measured by Office Blood Pressure (OBP)Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a MSDBP Response and MSDBP Control at Week 8, as Measured by OBPWeek 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDose/Exposure BP Response Relationship of LCI699, as Measured by Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYDose/Exposure BP Response Relationship of LCI699, as Measured by Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 8 LOCF, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM)Baseline, Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 8 LOCF, as Measured by ABPMBaseline, Week 8
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime SBP in LCI699 1mg QD Versus LCI699 0.5mg BID Arm at Week 4, as Measured by ABPMBaseline, Week 4
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure. Here, Number Analyzed 'n' represents number of participants who were evaluable for that specific category.
mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean 24 Hours, Mean Daytime and Mean Nighttime DBP in LCI699 1mg QD Versus LCI699 0.5mg BID Arm at Week 4, as Measured by ABPMBaseline, Week 4
FAS population included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies the number of participants who were evaluable for this measure. Here, Number Analyzed 'n' represents number of participants who were evaluable for that specific category.
mmHgMEAN

Results by group129

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)LCI699 0.25 mg BID-11.4Standard Error 2.96mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)LCI699 1 mg QD-13.1Standard Error 3.24mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)LCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID-12.5Standard Error 2.96mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Eplerenone 50 mg BID-18.7Standard Error 2.92mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSSBP at Week 8 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Placebo-8.8Standard Error 2.87mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFLCI699 0.25 mg BID-4.5Standard Error 1.72mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFLCI699 1 mg QD-6.0Standard Error 1.88mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID-6.1Standard Error 1.72mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFEplerenone 50 mg BID-7.7Standard Error 1.69mmHg
Change From Baseline in MSDBP at Week 8 LOCFPlacebo-4.8Standard Error 1.66mmHg

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLCI699 0.25 mg BID32
Overall StudySTARTEDLCI699 1 mg QD26
Overall StudySTARTEDLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID31
Overall StudySTARTEDEplerenone 50 mg BID33
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLCI699 0.25 mg BID23
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLCI699 1 mg QD22
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEplerenone 50 mg BID28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo25

Adverse events450

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersLCI699 0.25 mg BID032
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersLCI699 1.0 mg QD026
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID031
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersEplerenone 50 mg BID133
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo033
otherInner ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disordersLCI699 0.25 mg BID032
otherInner ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disordersLCI699 1.0 mg QD026
otherInner ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disordersLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID031
otherInner ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disordersEplerenone 50 mg BID033
otherInner ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo133

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLCI699 0.25 mg BID032
Total, all-cause mortalityLCI699 1.0 mg QD026
Total, all-cause mortalityLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID031
Total, all-cause mortalityEplerenone 50 mg BID033
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo033
Total, other adverse eventsLCI699 0.25 mg BID1532
Total, other adverse eventsLCI699 1.0 mg QD1526
Total, other adverse eventsLCI699 0.5 mg Followed by LCI699 1 mg BID831
Total, other adverse eventsEplerenone 50 mg BID1333
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1633

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
24107737DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00817635

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00817635/results?page=2