ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00829166

A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Participants With HER2-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

NCT00829166, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2013-04-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Participants With HER2-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. Trials, record NCT00829166. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00829166

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Participants With HER2-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT00829166
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
991 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Trastuzumab emtansine, Lapatinib, Capecitabine
First posted
2009-01-26
Last updated
2016-10-31
Results first posted
2013-04-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
PD was assessed by an IRC using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as target lesions (TLs) and recorded at baseline. TLs should be selected on the basis of their size (those with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements either by imaging or clinically. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD for TLs was defined as greater than or equal to (\>/=) 20 percent (%) increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Percentage of Participants with PD by IRC or death from any cause was reported.
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC (Co-primary Endpoint)From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs (on the basis of their size and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements either by imaging or clinically) and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD for TLs: \>/= 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs: appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD by IRC or death from any cause (whichever occurred earlier). The median duration of PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Died: Second Interim AnalysisFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported. The results are reported from second interim analysis, which deemed to be the confirmatory.
PrimaryOverall Survival: Second Interim Analysis (Co-primary Endpoint)From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The median duration of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. The results are reported from second interim analysis, which deemed to be the confirmatory.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Died: Final AnalysisFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported. The results reported are from the final analysis. The final analysis is descriptive.
PrimaryOverall Survival: Final AnalysisFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The median duration of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. The results reported are from the final analysis. The final analysis is descriptive.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 1Year 11 year survival was defined as the percentage of participants alive 1 year after starting treatment. The results reported are from the final analysis.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 2Year 22 year survival was defined as the percentage of participants alive 2 years after starting treatment. The results reported are from the final analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
PD was assessed by the investigator using modified RECIST. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. PD for TLs was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD by Investigator was reported.
SecondaryPFS as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline. A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD. PD for TLs was defined as \>/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to first documented PD by Investigator or death from any cause (whichever occurred earlier). The median duration of PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC (Co-primary Endpoint)From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Died: Second Interim AnalysisFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYOverall Survival: Second Interim Analysis (Co-primary Endpoint)From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Died: Final AnalysisFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYOverall Survival: Final AnalysisFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 1Year 1ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 2Year 2ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPFS as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)ITT population included all randomized participants on the basis of the treatment assigned at randomization.MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group34

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)Trastuzumab Emtansine53.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)Lapatinib + Capecitabine61.3percentage of participants
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC (Co-primary Endpoint)Trastuzumab Emtansine9.695% Confidence Interval 8.25 to 10.64Months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC (Co-primary Endpoint)Lapatinib + Capecitabine6.495% Confidence Interval 5.68 to 7.06Months
Percentage of Participants Who Died: Second Interim AnalysisTrastuzumab Emtansine30.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Died: Second Interim AnalysisLapatinib + Capecitabine36.7percentage of participants
Overall Survival: Second Interim Analysis (Co-primary Endpoint)Trastuzumab Emtansine30.995% Confidence Interval 26.81 to 34.27Months
Overall Survival: Second Interim Analysis (Co-primary Endpoint)Lapatinib + Capecitabine25.195% Confidence Interval 22.74 to 27.96Months
Percentage of Participants Who Died: Final AnalysisTrastuzumab Emtansine61.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Died: Final AnalysisLapatinib + Capecitabine67.1percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTrastuzumab Emtansine495
Overall StudySTARTEDLapatinib + Capecitabine496
Overall StudyTreatedTrastuzumab Emtansine490
Overall StudyTreatedLapatinib + Capecitabine488
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTrastuzumab Emtansine0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLapatinib + Capecitabine0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTrastuzumab Emtansine495
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLapatinib + Capecitabine496

Adverse events717

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTrastuzumab Emtansine67490
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLapatinib + Capecitabine40488
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLapatinib + Capecitabine/ Trastuzumab Emtansine11136
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTrastuzumab Emtansine37490
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLapatinib + Capecitabine43488
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLapatinib + Capecitabine/ Trastuzumab Emtansine0136
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTrastuzumab Emtansine150490
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLapatinib + Capecitabine13488
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersLapatinib + Capecitabine/ Trastuzumab Emtansine23136
otherDry eyeEye disordersTrastuzumab Emtansine0490

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTrastuzumab Emtansine
Total, all-cause mortalityLapatinib + Capecitabine
Total, all-cause mortalityLapatinib + Capecitabine/ Trastuzumab Emtansine
Total, other adverse eventsTrastuzumab Emtansine474490
Total, other adverse eventsLapatinib + Capecitabine471488
Total, other adverse eventsLapatinib + Capecitabine/ Trastuzumab Emtansine115136
Total, serious adverse eventsTrastuzumab Emtansine92490
Total, serious adverse eventsLapatinib + Capecitabine99488
Total, serious adverse eventsLapatinib + Capecitabine/ Trastuzumab Emtansine19136

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22437872DERIVEDPubMed
23020162DERIVEDPubMed
28526536DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00829166

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00829166/results?page=2