ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00830167

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Pregabalin In Patients With Fibromyalgia

NCT00830167, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.; results first posted 2012-06-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Pregabalin In Patients With Fibromyalgia. Trials, record NCT00830167. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00830167

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Pregabalin In Patients With Fibromyalgia
NCT number
NCT00830167
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
498 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Interventions
Placebo, Pregabalin
First posted
2009-01-27
Last updated
2021-01-25
Results first posted
2012-06-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes33

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to BaselineBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
Change from baseline in mean NRS-Pain scores at endpoint-LOCF. Daily pain scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale \<(NRS)-Pain\> ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Was Categorized as "Improved (Very Much Improved, Much Improved, or a Minimally Improved)" According to the Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGIC)Week 15 or study discontinuation
PGIC was defined as participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse) , 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep DisturbanceBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Sleep Disturbance subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of sleep disturbance. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- SnoringBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Snoring subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of snoring. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Awaken Short of Breath or With a HeadacheBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Awaken Short of Breath or With a Headache subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of the symptom. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Quantity of SleepBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Quantity of Sleep subscales rated 0 to 24 (number of hours slept). A higher score indicates greater quantity of sleep. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep AdequacyBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Sleep Adequacy subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of sleep adequacy. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- SomnolenceBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Somnolence subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of somnolence. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Overall Sleep Problems IndexBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Overall Sleep Problems Index subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of overall sleep problems. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
SecondaryMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep at EndpointWeek 15 or study discontinuation
MOS-Sleep is a patient-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Optimal sleep component is derived from Sleep Quantity average hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Optimal sleep was defined as sleep quantity of 7 or 8 hours per night.

Outcomes33

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to BaselineBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Was Categorized as Improved (Very Much Improved, Much Improved, or a Minimally Improved) According to the Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGIC)Week 15 or study discontinuationThe full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep DisturbanceBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- SnoringBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Awaken Short of Breath or With a HeadacheBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Quantity of SleepBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep AdequacyBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- SomnolenceBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Overall Sleep Problems IndexBaseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep at EndpointWeek 15 or study discontinuation
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 postbaseline pain score on study medication. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used.
ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group66

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to BaselinePlacebo-1.03Standard Error 0.12Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to BaselinePregabalin-1.48Standard Error 0.12Scores on a scale
Percentage of Participants Who Was Categorized as Improved (Very Much Improved, Much Improved, or a Minimally Improved) According to the Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGIC)Placebo62.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Was Categorized as Improved (Very Much Improved, Much Improved, or a Minimally Improved) According to the Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGIC)Pregabalin70.0Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep DisturbancePlacebo-8.13Standard Error 1.31Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep DisturbancePregabalin-17.62Standard Error 1.31Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- SnoringPlacebo-1.61Standard Error 1.33Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- SnoringPregabalin3.37Standard Error 1.33Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Awaken Short of Breath or With a HeadachePlacebo-3.02Standard Error 1.36Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Awaken Short of Breath or With a HeadachePregabalin-8.01Standard Error 1.36Scores on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo248
Overall StudySTARTEDPregabalin250
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo208
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPregabalin207
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo40
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPregabalin43

Adverse events20

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVision blurredEye disordersPlacebo3248
otherVision blurredEye disordersPregabalin13250
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo17248
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPregabalin36250
otherFeeling abnormalGeneral disordersPlacebo3248
otherFeeling abnormalGeneral disordersPregabalin20250
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersPlacebo3248
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersPregabalin18250
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo45248
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPregabalin45250

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityPregabalin
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo113248
Total, other adverse eventsPregabalin195250
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0248
Total, serious adverse eventsPregabalin1250

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23062189DERIVEDPubMed
26694975DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Pregabalin vs Placebo: Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep at EndpointTrial comparisons
Pregabalin vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00830167

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00830167/registered?page=2