ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00836693

Effect of Tadalafil Once a Day in Men With Erectile Dysfunction

NCT00836693, Phase 3, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2011-01-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Tadalafil Once a Day in Men With Erectile Dysfunction. Trials, record NCT00836693. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00836693

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Tadalafil Once a Day in Men With Erectile Dysfunction
NCT number
NCT00836693
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
217 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Erectile Dysfunction
Interventions
tadalafil, placebo
First posted
2009-02-04
Last updated
2011-01-04
Results first posted
2011-01-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low or no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) on 6 questions (1-5, 15 of the IIEF). Total Erectile Function Domain scores range from 0 to 30.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesBaseline, Week 12
Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 2. "Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?" Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant.
PrimarySexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesBaseline, 12 weeks
Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3. "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per NightBaseline, Week 12
NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The man wears the device for three nights prior to visit 2 (baseline), visit 5 (end of randomised treatment) and visit 6 (end of follow-up). Data are entered for the 2 nights prior to the visit. During the night the man may have multiple erections. The number of erections is recorded.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per NightBaseline, Week 12
NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The duration of erections are measured and recorded. Data presented are the duration of erectile events at baseline and the change from baseline to Week 12.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric ChangeBaseline, Week 12
NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The percent of volume change of the penis during erections is measured and recorded for each erection. Data presented are mean percentage of volumetric change from baseline to Week 12.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient DiaryBaseline, 12 weeks
The morning erection diary allows the participant to record whether he experienced an erection on waking. The participant is to complete the morning erection diary every morning during the run-in, treatment and follow-up periods. The percentage of mornings the participant reported an erection is analysed.
SecondaryThe Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week EndpointWeek 12
The subject questionnaire consists of 11 questions. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 4 (extremely high treatment satisfaction). The EDITS summary score will be obtained by adding each individual result for all questions, dividing by the number of questions answered (mean satisfaction score), and multiplying by 25, thus obtaining a score that ranges from 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 100 (extremely high satisfaction).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 12
SEAR measures improvement in self-esteem and relationship satisfaction. Questionnaire consists of two domains, Sexual Relationship (items 1-8) and Confidence (items 9-14). All questions except negatively worded questions 8 and 11 are scored from 1=almost never/never to 5=almost always/always. Questions 8 and 11 were reverse scored, thus a higher score signifies a more favorable response for all 14 items. Overall score is transformed into a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF)Baseline, Week 12Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OF domain range from 0 to 10.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
The efficacy analysis of the three primary efficacy variables (IIEF-EF, SEP Question 2, and SEP Question 3) was performed on all randomized subjects who had at least one baseline and one post-baseline observation on all three variables.
units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesBaseline, Week 12
The efficacy analysis of the three primary efficacy variables (IIEF-EF, SEP Question 2, and SEP Question 3) was performed on all randomized subjects who had at least one baseline and one post-baseline observation on all three variables.
percentage of yes responsesMEAN
PRIMARYSexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesBaseline, 12 weeks
The efficacy analysis of the three primary efficacy variables (IIEF-EF, SEP Question 2, and SEP Question 3) was performed on all randomized subjects who had at least one baseline and one post-baseline observation on all three variables.
percentage of yes responsesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per NightBaseline, Week 12The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.Number of events per nightMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per NightBaseline, Week 12The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.minutesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric ChangeBaseline, Week 12The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.percent of volumetric changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient DiaryBaseline, 12 weeksThe ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.percentMEAN
SECONDARYThe Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week EndpointWeek 12The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 12The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF)Baseline, Week 12The ITT analysis set included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and post-baseline observation.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group108

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12TadalafilBaseline15.5Standard Deviation 6.00units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12PlaceboBaseline16.0Standard Deviation 6.27units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12TadalafilWeek 12 Change7.3Standard Deviation 6.01units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12PlaceboWeek 12 Change3.3Standard Deviation 5.98units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesTadalafilBaseline60.1Standard Deviation 38.77percentage of yes responses
Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesPlaceboBaseline59.9Standard Deviation 38.83percentage of yes responses
Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesTadalafilWeek 12 Change23.2Standard Deviation 31.92percentage of yes responses
Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesPlaceboWeek 12 Change11.6Standard Deviation 25.48percentage of yes responses
Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesTadalafilBaseline28.2Standard Deviation 31.86percentage of yes responses
Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes ResponsesPlaceboBaseline32.2Standard Deviation 35.93percentage of yes responses

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTadalafil147
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo70
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTadalafil130
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo64
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTadalafil17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo6

Adverse events60

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersTadalafil11471
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersPlacebo0700
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersTadalafil21472
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0700
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersTadalafil41474
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0700
otherChest painGeneral disordersTadalafil11473
otherChest painGeneral disordersPlacebo0700
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersTadalafil11471
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersPlacebo0700

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTadalafil
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsTadalafil27147
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo770
Total, serious adverse eventsTadalafil2147
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo170

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21707928DERIVEDPubMed
22790642DERIVEDPubMed
24119319DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Tadalafil vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00836693

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00836693/results?page=2