ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00853580

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Lovastatin in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1

NCT00853580, Phase 2, Completed, University of Alabama at Birmingham; results first posted 2018-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Lovastatin in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Trials, record NCT00853580. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00853580

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Lovastatin in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1
NCT number
NCT00853580
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
146 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Conditions
Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Interventions
Lovastatin ™, placebo
First posted
2009-03-02
Last updated
2018-03-12
Results first posted
2018-03-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPaired Associate Learning (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
A computerized test of visuospatial learning. Participants had to remember patterns associated with different locations on the screen, and during the test phase, as each pattern is presented, point to the appropriate location. The test starts at a very simple level and gradually increases in difficulty. Higher number of errors indicates poorer performance. Scale does not have a maximum range.
PrimaryScore! (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Score! is a measure of sustained attention. Participants were required to silently count a series of aurally presented tones and say the total number of tones counted at the end of each trial. The number of tones ranged from 9 to 15, with a total of 10 trials (range 0-10). Higher values represent better performance.
SecondarySpatial Working Memory (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
A computerized measure of spatial working memory. This task assessed the participant's ability to retain spatial information and to manipulate remembered items in working memory. In this test, participants were shown an array of boxes on a computer screen and they were required to search through the boxes for hidden tokens. One box at a time was touched until a blue token was found inside. Participants then commenced a new search for the next token. The key instruction was that, once a token had been located, that box would not be used again to hide another token. Unit of measure was between search errors, determined by the number of boxes a participant reopens in which a token had previously been found. Higher score indicated poorer performance. Scale does not have a maximum range.
SecondaryStockings of Cambridge (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) Automated Battery).Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
A computerized measure of spatial planning based on the "Tower of London" test. It required participants to move balls in a lower display to match a pattern shown in the upper display in a certain number of moves. More specifically, the participant was shown two displays containing three coloured balls. The displays were presented in such a way that they could be perceived as stacks of coloured balls held in socks suspended from a beam. The test administrator first demonstrated to the participant how to move the balls in the lower display to copy the pattern in the upper display and completed one demonstration problem, where the solution required one move. The participant then completed problems that increased in difficulty, from one through to five move problems. The unit of measure was the mean number of moves taken to complete a problem that could not be completed in less than five moves. The higher the score, the poorer the performance (range 5-12).
SecondaryStop Signal Task (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
A computerized measure of inhibitory control. The participant quickly responded to an arrow stimulus by pressing one of two buttons (left or right), depending on the direction in which the arrow pointed on the screen. If an audio tone is present, the subject was supposed to withhold the response. The difficulty of the task was manipulated by altering the delay before a stop signal (auditory tone) was presented, known as the stop signal delay. The outcome from this measure was stop signal reaction time (last half of test), which was computed by subtracting the mean stop signal delay at which the participant was able to stop on 50% of trials from the mean reaction time on go trials. Poorer response inhibition was reflected by a larger stop signal reaction time. Scale does not have a maximum range.
SecondarySky Search (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Sky Search is a measure of selective visual attention. Participants were presented with a A3 sheet with target stimuli (spaceships in identical pairs) randomly distributed among many distractors (spaceships in non-identical pairs). They were required to circle as many of the targets as possible as quickly as possible. The outcome measure (attention score), was a timing score reflecting the average time taken per target found. Higher scores represent poorer performance. Raw data are reported. Scale does not have a maximum range.
SecondarySky Search DT (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Sky Search DT is a test of divided attention. Children completed a parallel version of the Sky Search subtest while at the same time, silently counted the number of tones in a similar way to the Score! subtest. Higher scores represent poorer performance. Raw data are reported. Scale does not have a maximum range.
SecondaryCreature Counting (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Creature Counting is a measure of attentional control. Participants were required to count "creatures" from top of the page to the bottom, using arrows as cues to switch from counting up to counting down (and vice versa). There were seven testing trials. The outcome variable was the total number of correct trials (range 0-7). Higher scores represent better performances.
SecondaryCommission Errors (Conners Continuous Performance Test, Second Edition; CPT-II)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
A computerised measure of impulse control. Letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). Commission errors represented the number of times a participant incorrectly responded to the non-target (letter 'X'). T-scores are reported, as generated by the test software. Higher scores indicate poorer performances.
SecondaryOmission Errors (Conners Continuous Performance Test, Second Edition; CPT-II)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
A computerised measure of vigilance and concentration. Letters were presented serially on a screen in a random order. All letters were considered target stimuli, except for the letter 'X' which is a non-target stimulus. Participants responded to target stimuli by pressing the space bar of a computer keyboard (90% of the stimuli) while withholding responses to non-target stimuli (10% of the test). Omission errors represented the number of times a participant fails to respond to target letters (all other than 'X'). T-scores are reported, as generated by the test software. Higher scores indicate poorer performances.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPaired Associate Learning (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
PAL Total ErrorsMEAN
PRIMARYScore! (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSpatial Working Memory (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
ErrorsMEAN
SECONDARYStockings of Cambridge (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) Automated Battery).Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
MovesMEAN
SECONDARYStop Signal Task (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
MillisecondsMEAN
SECONDARYSky Search (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSky Search DT (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCreature Counting (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCommission Errors (Conners Continuous Performance Test, Second Edition; CPT-II)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
T scoreMEAN
SECONDARYOmission Errors (Conners Continuous Performance Test, Second Edition; CPT-II)Baseline and Post-treatment (16 weeks)
Intention to treat using the modified intention-to-treat population (defined as all subjects that had baseline data). Missing post-treatment values were imputed using linear regression with age, sex and baseline values used as predictors (20 imputations).
T scoreMEAN

Results by group80

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Paired Associate Learning (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).LovastatinBaseline15.8Standard Error 22.4PAL Total Errors
Paired Associate Learning (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).PlaceboBaseline17.0Standard Error 15.4PAL Total Errors
Paired Associate Learning (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).LovastatinPost-treatment10.3Standard Error 8.4PAL Total Errors
Paired Associate Learning (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery).PlaceboPost-treatment11.7Standard Error 11.7PAL Total Errors
Score! (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)LovastatinBaseline6.0Standard Deviation 2.0Units on a scale
Score! (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)PlaceboBaseline5.7Standard Deviation 2.4Units on a scale
Score! (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)LovastatinPost-treatment7.3Standard Deviation 2.1Units on a scale
Score! (Test of Everyday Attention for Children)PlaceboPost-treatment6.8Standard Deviation 2.5Units on a scale
Spatial Working Memory (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery)LovastatinBaseline47.0Standard Deviation 15.9Errors
Spatial Working Memory (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery)PlaceboBaseline47.9Standard Deviation 16.2Errors

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLovastatin74
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo72
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLovastatin67
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo56
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLovastatin7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo16

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherGeneralGeneral disordersLovastatin2974
otherGeneralGeneral disordersPlacebo2370
otherCardiovascularCardiac disordersLovastatin774
otherCardiovascularCardiac disordersPlacebo770
otherGastrointestinalGastrointestinal disordersLovastatin3374
otherGastrointestinalGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3270
otherHematologicBlood and lymphatic system disordersLovastatin1074
otherHematologicBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1270
otherHepatobiliaryHepatobiliary disordersLovastatin374
otherHepatobiliaryHepatobiliary disordersPlacebo470

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLovastatin074
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo070
Total, other adverse eventsLovastatin6574
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5970
Total, serious adverse eventsLovastatin674
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo170

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
27956565DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lovastatin vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Lovastatin vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests6

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Paired Associate LearningPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Continuous Performance TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Line Angle MatchingSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Stop-Signal TaskSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Tower PlanningSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00853580

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00853580/results?page=2