ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00853606

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Avanafil in Men With Erectile Dysfunction

NCT00853606, Phase 3, Completed, VIVUS LLC; results first posted 2012-06-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Avanafil in Men With Erectile Dysfunction. Trials, record NCT00853606. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00853606

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Avanafil in Men With Erectile Dysfunction
NCT number
NCT00853606
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
712 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
VIVUS LLC
Conditions
Erectile Dysfunction
Interventions
avanafil
First posted
2009-03-02
Last updated
2012-08-17
Results first posted
2012-06-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Percentage of Sexual Attempts in Which Subjects Were Able to Maintain an Erection of Sufficient Duration to Have Successful Intercourse.Baseline, 52 weeks
Data presented as mean change from baseline and the treatment period in the percentage of Yes responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary question 3 "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" Baseline is the run-in period from the qualifying study (TA-301/TA-302) consisting of all data reported during the non-treatment interval from Visit 1 to Visit 2. The treatment period is the on-treatment interval beginning with the first dose of study drug and ending on the last study visit.
PrimaryChange in Percentage of Sexual Attempts in Which Subjects Were Able to Insert the Penis Into the Partner's VaginaBaseline, 52 weeks
Data presented as mean change from baseline and the treatment period in the percentage of Yes responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary question 2 "Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?" Baseline is the run-in period from the qualifying study (TA-301/TA-302) consisting of all data reported during the non-treatment interval from Visit 1 to Visit 2. The treatment period is the on-treatment interval beginning with the first dose of study drug and ending on the last study visit.
PrimaryChange in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) ScoreBaseline, End of Treatment
Questionnaire assesses subject's evaluation of erectile function over the previous 4-week period. Total score from questions 1-5 \& 15 ranges from 1 to 30. A higher score indicates better erectile function. Baseline is the observation at Visit 2 of the qualifying study (TA-301/TA-302). End of treatment is the observation at Visit 8 of the last observation carried forward.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Percentage of Sexual Attempts in Which Subjects Were Able to Maintain an Erection of Sufficient Duration to Have Successful Intercourse.Baseline, 52 weeksNumber of participants analyzed represents the Intent-to-Treat population.percentage of sexual attemptsMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Percentage of Sexual Attempts in Which Subjects Were Able to Insert the Penis Into the Partner's VaginaBaseline, 52 weeksNumber of participants analyzed represents to Intent-to-Treat population.percentage of sexual attemptsMEAN
PRIMARYChange in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) ScoreBaseline, End of TreatmentNumber of participants analyzed represents the Intent-to-Treat population. For dropouts of missing data, the last observation carried forward convention was used.scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group3

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Percentage of Sexual Attempts in Which Subjects Were Able to Maintain an Erection of Sufficient Duration to Have Successful Intercourse.Avanafil54.75Standard Deviation 35.915percentage of sexual attempts
Change in Percentage of Sexual Attempts in Which Subjects Were Able to Insert the Penis Into the Partner's VaginaAvanafil36.91Standard Deviation 36.142percentage of sexual attempts
Change in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) ScoreAvanafil10.3Standard Deviation 7.88scores on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAvanafil712
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAvanafil492
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAvanafil220

Adverse events18

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
othernasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsAvanafil24712
otherheadacheNervous system disordersAvanafil40712
otherflushingVascular disordersAvanafil25712
othernasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersAvanafil15712
seriousAcute physchosisPsychiatric disordersAvanafil1712
seriouspancreatitis acuteGastrointestinal disordersAvanafil1712
seriousfemoral artery occlusionVascular disordersAvanafil1712
seriousinguinal herniaGastrointestinal disordersAvanafil1712
serioussyncope vasovagalNervous system disordersAvanafil1712
seriouscoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersAvanafil1712

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAvanafil
Total, other adverse eventsAvanafil87712
Total, serious adverse eventsAvanafil11712

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23521325DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00853606

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00853606/registered