ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00862251

Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (MK-0653A) Versus Rosuvastatin Versus Doubling Statin Dose in Participants With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus (MK-0653A-133)(COMPLETED)

NCT00862251, Phase 3, Completed, Organon and Co; results first posted 2012-03-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (MK-0653A) Versus Rosuvastatin Versus Doubling Statin Dose in Participants With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus (MK-0653A-133)(COMPLETED). Trials, record NCT00862251. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00862251

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (MK-0653A) Versus Rosuvastatin Versus Doubling Statin Dose in Participants With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus (MK-0653A-133)(COMPLETED)
NCT number
NCT00862251
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
808 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Conditions
Cardiovascular Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
ezetimibe (+) simvastatin, simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg, Rosuvastatin, atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg
First posted
2009-03-16
Last updated
2024-05-16
Results first posted
2012-03-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).Baseline and Week 6
SecondaryIn Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of SimvastatinBaseline and Week 6
SecondaryIn Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of AtorvastatinBaseline and Week 6
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to RosuvastatinBaseline and Week 6
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Week 6
SecondaryIn Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Week 6
SecondaryIn Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Week 6
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)Baseline and Week 6
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline and Week 6
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Baseline and Week 6

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).Baseline and Week 6Efficacy data were analyzed using the full analysis set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of blinded study treatment and had baseline data.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYIn Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of SimvastatinBaseline and Week 6Analysis performed on subpopulation of participants who were previously treated with simvastatin 20 mg and were switched to either Ezetimibe/simvastatin or had simvastatin dose doubled to 40 mgPercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYIn Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of AtorvastatinBaseline and Week 6Analysis performed on subpopulation of participants who were previously treated with atorvastatin 10 mg and were switched to either Ezetimibe/simvastatin or had atorvastatin dose doubled to 20 mgPercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to RosuvastatinBaseline and Week 6
Efficacy data were analyzed primarily based upon the full analysis set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of blinded study treatment and had baseline data.
Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Week 6Efficacy data were analyzed using the full analysis set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of blinded study treatment and had baseline data.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYIn Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Week 6Analysis performed on subpopulation of participants who were previously treated with simvastatin 20 mg and were switched to either Ezetimibe/simvastatin or had simvastatin dose doubled to 40 mgparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYIn Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Week 6Analysis performed on subpopulation of participants who were previously treated with atorvastatin 10 mg and were switched to either Ezetimibe/simvastatin or had atorvastatin dose doubled to 20 mgparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)Baseline and Week 6Efficacy data were analyzed using the full analysis set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of blinded study treatment and had baseline data.Percent ChangeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in TriglyceridesBaseline and Week 6Efficacy data were analyzed using the full analysis set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of blinded study treatment and had baseline data.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Baseline and Week 6Efficacy data were analyzed using the full analysis set (FAS) population defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of blinded study treatment and had baseline data.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).Ezetimibe/Simvastatin-23.1395% Confidence Interval -25.95 to -20.31Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).Doubling Statin Dose-8.3795% Confidence Interval -12.32 to -4.41Percent change
In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of SimvastatinEzetimibe/Simvastatin-21.5995% Confidence Interval -25.54 to -17.65Percent change
In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of SimvastatinDoubling Simvastatin Dose-7.9895% Confidence Interval -13.57 to -2.38Percent change
In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of AtorvastatinEzetimibe/Simvastatin-24.5895% Confidence Interval -28.63 to -20.53Percent change
In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of AtorvastatinDoubling Atorvastatin Dose-8.8595% Confidence Interval -14.47 to -3.23Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to RosuvastatinEzetimibe/Simvastatin-23.1395% Confidence Interval -25.95 to -20.31Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to RosuvastatinRosuvastatin-19.3295% Confidence Interval -22.14 to -16.51Percent change
Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Ezetimibe/Simvastatin171participants
Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)Doubling Statin Dose43participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEzetimibe/Simvastatin322
Overall StudySTARTEDDoubling Statin Dose162
Overall StudySTARTEDRosuvastatin324
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEzetimibe/Simvastatin303
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDoubling Statin Dose157
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRosuvastatin315
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEzetimibe/Simvastatin19
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDoubling Statin Dose5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRosuvastatin9

Adverse events15

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersEzetimibe/Simvastatin13211
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersDoubling Statin Dose01620
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersRosuvastatin03230
seriousAngina unstableCardiac disordersEzetimibe/Simvastatin03210
seriousAngina unstableCardiac disordersDoubling Statin Dose01620
seriousAngina unstableCardiac disordersRosuvastatin13231
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersEzetimibe/Simvastatin13211
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersDoubling Statin Dose01620
seriousCoronary artery diseaseCardiac disordersRosuvastatin03230
seriousMyocardial infarctionCardiac disordersEzetimibe/Simvastatin03210

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEzetimibe/Simvastatin
Total, all-cause mortalityDoubling Statin Dose
Total, all-cause mortalityRosuvastatin
Total, other adverse eventsEzetimibe/Simvastatin0321
Total, other adverse eventsDoubling Statin Dose0162
Total, other adverse eventsRosuvastatin0323
Total, serious adverse eventsEzetimibe/Simvastatin2321
Total, serious adverse eventsDoubling Statin Dose1162
Total, serious adverse eventsRosuvastatin2323

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23279632DERIVEDPubMed
23288881DERIVEDPubMed
23866306DERIVEDPubMed
26486166DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling Simvastatin Dose: In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Trial comparisons
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling Atorvastatin Dose: In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00862251

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00862251/results?page=2