ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00863122

Concentration and Activity of Lapatinib in Vestibular Schwannomas

NCT00863122, Early phase 1, Completed, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins; results first posted 2018-11-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Concentration and Activity of Lapatinib in Vestibular Schwannomas. Trials, record NCT00863122. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00863122

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Concentration and Activity of Lapatinib in Vestibular Schwannomas
NCT number
NCT00863122
Status
Completed
Phases
Early phase 1
Enrollment
26 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Conditions
Vestibular Schwannoma, NF2, Neurofibromatosis 2, Acoustic Neuroma, Auditory Tumor
Interventions
lapatinib
First posted
2009-03-17
Last updated
2021-01-12
Results first posted
2018-11-26
Limitations and caveats
A total of 10 tissue and 11 plasma samples donated by participants receiving lapatinib and 2 tissue samples from control participants were lost from analysis due to freezer failure denaturing the samples. This substantially reduced the sample size.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMedian Steady-state Lapatinib Plasma Concentrations at the Time of Surgical ResectionAt time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.Steady-state plasma concentrations of lapatinib (ng/mL) at time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.
PrimaryTo Assess Whether Lapatinib Can Reach a Minimum Tumor Concentration Level of >3uM in VS After Oral Dosing.one yearCount of tissue samples with lapatinib concentration \>3uM
SecondaryAssess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.at time of surgeryAssessed number of samples with high expression of phospho-ErbB2 in tissue at time of surgery
SecondaryAssess Markers of Tumor Proliferation and Cell Death in VS After Exposure to Lapatinib.At time of surgery
SecondaryExplore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.one yearA comparison in the median lapatinib concentration (ng/g) in vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 and sporadic vestibular schwannomas
SecondaryPerform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.at time of surgeryDue to the sample sizes, a comparison between sporadic and NF2-related vestibular schwannomas could not be made. Instead we report the mutational status.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMedian Steady-state Lapatinib Plasma Concentrations at the Time of Surgical ResectionAt time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.
In the lapatinib group, 10 tissue and plasma samples were lost from analysis due to a freezer failure during a natural disaster denaturing the samples. 1 blood sample was contaminated, but tissue was available. Control group did not get any drug. A total of 8 participants of 19 given drug had data for analysis.
ng/mLMEDIAN
PRIMARYTo Assess Whether Lapatinib Can Reach a Minimum Tumor Concentration Level of >3uM in VS After Oral Dosing.one year
In the lapatinib group, 10 tissue and plasma samples were lost from analysis due to a freezer failure during a natural disaster denaturing the samples. Nine samples were available for tissue concentration assessment.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAssess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.at time of surgery10 lapatinib participants and 3 control participants did not have adequate tissue for analysis.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAssess Markers of Tumor Proliferation and Cell Death in VS After Exposure to Lapatinib.At time of surgeryThe experiment to assess this outcome measure failed and no interpretable data could be collected.
SECONDARYExplore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.one year
Of the nine participants in the lapatinib who had tumor available for analysis, four had a vestibular schwnannoma associated with a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2); five had sporadic vestibular schwannomas.
ng/gMEDIAN
SECONDARYPerform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.at time of surgery6 of the 7 participants had sporadic VS; 1 of 7 had NF2-associated VS. As such, we were unable to explore differences between the groups.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Median Steady-state Lapatinib Plasma Concentrations at the Time of Surgical ResectionLapatinib3149Full Range 786 to 5830ng/mL
To Assess Whether Lapatinib Can Reach a Minimum Tumor Concentration Level of >3uM in VS After Oral Dosing.Lapatinib7Participants
Assess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.Lapatinib5Participants
Assess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.Control2Participants
Explore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.NF2 Associated VS8367Full Range 314 to 17821ng/g
Explore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.Sporadic VS4502Full Range 1737 to 11712ng/g
Perform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.Participants With Tissue Available for Gene Mutation AnalysisHemizygous deletion in NF2 gene4Participants
Perform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.Participants With Tissue Available for Gene Mutation AnalysisHomozygous deletion in NF2 gene1Participants
Perform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.Participants With Tissue Available for Gene Mutation AnalysisNo deletion in NF2 gene2Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLapatinib19
Overall StudySTARTEDControl7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLapatinib19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLapatinib0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl0

Adverse events10

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherRashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersLapatinib6196
otherRashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersControl000
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLapatinib7197
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersControl000
otherFatigueGeneral disordersLapatinib4194
otherFatigueGeneral disordersControl000
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLapatinib4194
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersControl000
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersLapatinib2192
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersControl000

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLapatinib
Total, all-cause mortalityControl
Total, other adverse eventsLapatinib1219
Total, other adverse eventsControl00
Total, serious adverse eventsLapatinib019
Total, serious adverse eventsControl00

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Lapatinib vs Control: Assess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00863122

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00863122/registered