Trial · NCT00875667
A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
NCT00875667, Phase 2, Completed, Celgene; results first posted 2019-09-16
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). Trials, record NCT00875667. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00875667
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- A Study to Determine the Efficacy of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
- NCT number
- NCT00875667
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 254 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Conditions
- Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell
- Interventions
- Lenalidomide, Investigators choice single agent
- First posted
- 2009-04-03
- Last updated
- 2019-09-16
- Results first posted
- 2019-09-16
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes47
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to data cut off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up time was 93.9 weeks | PFS was defined as time of randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. |
| Primary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to study discontinuation of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks | Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS were defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last completed assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response (CR), Complete Response unconfirmed (CRu) or Partial Response (PR). Participants who discontinued before any response had been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm | Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999; CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. |
| Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm | Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. |
| Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm | Duration of response was defined as the time from when the first response of CR, CRu, or PR was first achieved until documented tumor progression, or until the participant died from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not progress or die at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | Tumor control rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses. Stable disease (SD) is defined as less than a PR (see above) but is not progressive disease or relapsed disease. |
| Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm | Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. |
| Secondary | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm | Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression. Time to progression did not include deaths. Participants without progression at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants who received a new anti-lymphoma treatment without documented progression were censored at the last assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. |
1 to 10 of 47Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 47 registered outcomesOutcomes47
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to data cut off date of 07 March 2014; overall median follow-up time was 93.9 weeks | ITT population included all randomized participants. | weeks | MEDIAN |
| PRIMARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis | From randomization to progression of disease or death; up to study discontinuation of 09 October 2018; overall median follow-up time was 285 weeks | ITT population included all randomized participants. | weeks | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Percentage of Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for lenalidomide and 13.1 weeks for the investigator choice arm | ITT population included all randomized participants. | Percentage of Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm | The analysis population included participants with an overall response. | Weeks | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm | The analysis population included participants with an overall response. | Weeks | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | ITT population includes all randomized participants. | Percentage of Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response, Unconfirmed Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median treatment duration was 24.3 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 13.1 weeks for the investigators choice arm | ITT population includes all randomized participants. | Percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression According to the IRC Central Review | From date of randomization to the data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; median study duration was 70.7 weeks for the lenalidomide arm and 69.3 weeks for the investigators choice arm | ITT population includes all randomized participants. | Weeks | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | From date of randomization to the study discontinuation date of 09 October 2018; median study duration was 103.9 weeks for lenalidomide and 87.0 weeks for the investigator choice arm | ITT population includes all randomized participants. | Weeks | MEDIAN |
1 to 10 of 47Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 47 outcomesResults by group278
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review | Lenalidomide | 37.6 | 95% Confidence Interval 24.0 to 52.6 | weeks | |
| Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Central Review | Investigators Choice | 22.7 | 95% Confidence Interval 15.9 to 30.1 | weeks | |
| Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis | Lenalidomide | 37.3 | 95% Confidence Interval 24.1 to 52.6 | weeks | |
| Kaplan Meier Estimate for Progression Free Survival by Investigator's Assessment at the Final Analysis | Investigators Choice | 23.6 | 95% Confidence Interval 15.9 to 33.3 | weeks | |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review | Lenalidomide | 40.0 | 95% Confidence Interval 32.58 to 47.78 | Percentage of Participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the IRC Central Review | Investigators Choice | 10.7 | 95% Confidence Interval 5.02 to 19.37 | Percentage of Participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Lenalidomide | 45.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 38.23 to 53.68 | Percentage of Participants | |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator at the Final Analysis | Investigators Choice | 22.6 | 95% Confidence Interval 14.20 to 33.05 | Percentage of Participants | |
| Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review | Lenalidomide | 69.6 | 95% Confidence Interval 41.1 to 86.7 | Weeks | |
| Kaplan Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR) According to the IRC Central Review | Investigators Choice | 45.1 | 95% Confidence Interval 36.3 to 80.9 | Weeks |
1 to 10 of 278Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 278 results by groupParticipant flow10
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Lenalidomide | 170 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Investigators Choice | 84 | |
| Overall Study | Crossover From IC to Lenalidomide | Lenalidomide | 0 | |
| Overall Study | Crossover From IC to Lenalidomide | Investigators Choice | 40 | |
| Overall Study | Participants Treated | Lenalidomide | 167 | |
| Overall Study | Participants Treated | Investigators Choice | 83 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Lenalidomide | 0 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Investigators Choice | 11 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Lenalidomide | 170 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Investigators Choice | 73 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events318
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | ANAEMIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Lenalidomide | 45 | 167 | |
| other | ANAEMIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Investigator's Choice | 18 | 83 | |
| other | LEUKOPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Lenalidomide | 29 | 167 | |
| other | LEUKOPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Investigator's Choice | 18 | 83 | |
| other | LYMPHOPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Lenalidomide | 8 | 167 | |
| other | LYMPHOPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Investigator's Choice | 6 | 83 | |
| other | NEUTROPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Lenalidomide | 86 | 167 | |
| other | NEUTROPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Investigator's Choice | 29 | 83 | |
| other | THROMBOCYTOPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Lenalidomide | 63 | 167 | |
| other | THROMBOCYTOPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Investigator's Choice | 33 | 83 |
1 to 10 of 318Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 318 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Lenalidomide | 119 | 167 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Investigator's Choice | 59 | 83 |
| Total, other adverse events | Lenalidomide | 146 | 167 |
| Total, other adverse events | Investigator's Choice | 61 | 83 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Lenalidomide | 75 | 167 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Investigator's Choice | 22 | 83 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers2
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons2
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Lenalidomide vs Investigator's Choice: deaths from any cause | Trial comparisons |
| Lenalidomide vs Investigator's Choice: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00875667
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00875667/registered?page=2