ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00876187

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Baseline, Week 16ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values.units on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline at Week 16 in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score : Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Baseline, Week 16ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent (%) and 50% Reduction From Baseline in Daily Average Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Worst and Average Pain at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Pain Interference Index, Pain Interference Score for General Activity, Walking Ability, Sleep and Normal Work at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: BOCF
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set. BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 16ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Responder Index: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. BOCF method was used to impute missing values.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) at Week 8 and 16Baseline, Week 8, 16
ITT analysis set. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
percentage of impairmentMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Used Rescue MedicationsWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Rescue Medication UseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
days/weekMEDIAN
SECONDARYAmount of Rescue Medication TakenWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
ITT analysis set. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
mg per weekMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8, 16 and 24Baseline, Week 8, 16, 24
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. Here 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Developed Anti-Tanezumab AntibodiesBaseline (Day 1), Week 8, 16, 24
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPlasma Concentration of TanezumabBaseline (pre-dose and 1 hour [hr] post-dose); Any time point at Week 4 Visit; Week 8 (pre-dose and 1 hr post-dose); Any time point at Week 16 Visit, at Week 24 Visit
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively
nanogram per milliliterMEAN
SECONDARYTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) ConcentrationBaseline (pre-dose and 1 hour [hr] post-dose); Any time point at Week 4 Visit; Week 8 (pre-dose and 1 hr post-dose); Any time point at Week 16 Visit, at Week 24 Visit
ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication. Here, Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' = participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively
picogram per mLMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 24ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00876187/outcomes