ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00877006

Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With R-CVP or R-CHOP in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Referred to as the BRIGHT Study

NCT00877006, Phase 3, Completed, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.; results first posted 2014-04-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With R-CVP or R-CHOP in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Referred to as the BRIGHT Study. Trials, record NCT00877006. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00877006

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With R-CVP or R-CHOP in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Referred to as the BRIGHT Study
NCT number
NCT00877006
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
447 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Conditions
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Interventions
bendamustine, rituximab, vincristine, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin
First posted
2009-04-07
Last updated
2018-02-05
Results first posted
2014-04-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment Period6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
CR=complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, if present pretherapy; protocol-specified positron emission tomography (PET) scan assessment criteria; (if the spleen and/or liver were enlarged on the basis of physical examination and/or anatomic imaging before treatment) the liver and/or spleen were considered normal size on physical examination and by anatomic imaging after therapy, with disappearance of all nodules related to lymphoma; (if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment) the infiltrate must have cleared on subsequent bone marrow biopsies.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment Period6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
Overall Response=participants with Complete Remission (CR) + those with Partial Remission (PR). CR=see Outcome Measure 1 for details. PR= at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the product of the greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes/masses; at least a 50% decrease in the SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules in their greatest transverse diameter; no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, and other nodes; no measurable disease in organs other than the liver or spleen; no new sites of disease; protocol-specified PET scan and bone marrow criteria.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment Period32 weeks
AE=any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity after dispensation of the study drug and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended physical sign, symptom, or laboratory parameter that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study, or significant worsening of the disease under study (or any concurrent disease), whether or not considered related to the study drug. AEs were graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). SAE=an adverse event occurring at any dose that results in: death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of one's ability to conduct normal life functions), a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event.
SecondaryWorst Overall Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grades for Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)
Clinical laboratory data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for serum chemistry test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and laboratory test across all cycles).
SecondaryWorst Overall CTCAE Grade for Hematology Laboratory Test Results32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, weekly during treatment, and at the end-of-treatment visit)
Hematology test data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for hematology test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and hematology test across all cycles).
SecondaryClinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)
SecondaryPotentially Clinically Significant Abnormal WeightBaseline, Week 32Participants were weighed at Baseline and at Endpoint (Week 32); those participants with an increase or decrease of \>=10% were considered potentially clinically significant.
SecondaryEastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at the End of Treatment PeriodWeek 32Participants' ECOG Performance Status was evaluated at the end of treatment as improved, stayed the same, or worsened from baseline (see Baseline Characteristics for ECOG Performance Status).
SecondaryTherapeutic Classification of Prior Medicationsprior to start of treatment
SecondaryTherapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications32 weeks

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment Period6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
Evaluable Analysis Set: treated participants with a baseline and \>=1 post-baseline response evaluation (based on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging \[CT/MRI\] or positron emission tomography \[PET\] and clinical data), or who discontinued treatment due to progressive disease and had no major protocol violations.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment Period6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
Evaluable Analysis Set: treated participants with a baseline and \>=1 post-baseline response evaluation (based on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging \[CT/MRI\] or positron emission tomography \[PET\] and clinical data), or who discontinued treatment due to progressive disease and had no major protocol violations.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment Period32 weeksSafety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYWorst Overall Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grades for Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)Safety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen and who had a post-baseline assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYWorst Overall CTCAE Grade for Hematology Laboratory Test Results32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, weekly during treatment, and at the end-of-treatment visit)Safety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen and who had an assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYClinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)Safety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen and had baseline and post-baseline values.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPotentially Clinically Significant Abnormal WeightBaseline, Week 32Safety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen with a baseline and post-baseline weight.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at the End of Treatment PeriodWeek 32Safety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen and with baseline and post-baseline values.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTherapeutic Classification of Prior Medicationsprior to start of treatmentSafety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment groupparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTherapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications32 weeksSafety Analysis Set: all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received 1 or more doses of any component of any study drug regimen.participantsNUMBER

Results by group330

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment PeriodBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)3195% Confidence Interval 25.3 to 38.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment PeriodR-CHOP/R-CVP2595% Confidence Interval 19.5 to 31.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment PeriodBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)9795% Confidence Interval 93.3 to 98.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment PeriodR-CHOP/R-CVP9195% Confidence Interval 86.0 to 94.4percentage of participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment PeriodBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)Any AE221participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment PeriodR-CHOP/R-CVPAny AE213participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment PeriodBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)Severe AEs (grades 3, 4, 5)130participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment PeriodR-CHOP/R-CVPSevere AEs (grades 3, 4, 5)127participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment PeriodBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)Treatment-related AEs209participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment PeriodR-CHOP/R-CVPTreatment-related AEsNAparticipants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)224
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDR-CHOP/R-CVP223
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)199
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDR-CHOP/R-CVP196
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)25
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDR-CHOP/R-CVP27
Long-Term Follow-up PeriodSTARTEDBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)210
Long-Term Follow-up PeriodSTARTEDR-CHOP/R-CVP209
Long-Term Follow-up PeriodCOMPLETEDBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)157
Long-Term Follow-up PeriodCOMPLETEDR-CHOP/R-CVP154

Adverse events304

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)3122163
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersR-CHOP/CVP2921569
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)72219
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersR-CHOP/CVP1121512
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)2122179
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersR-CHOP/CVP2221588
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)14221104
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersR-CHOP/CVP1221544
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)76221251
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersR-CHOP/CVP85215255

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)
Total, all-cause mortalityR-CHOP/CVP
Total, other adverse eventsBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)216221
Total, other adverse eventsR-CHOP/CVP211215
Total, serious adverse eventsBendamustine and Rituximab (BR)60221
Total, serious adverse eventsR-CHOP/CVP49215

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
24591201RESULTPubMed
26875824DERIVEDPubMed
30811293DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) vs R-CHOP/R-CVP: Participants With Disease Progression, Relapse or Death At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up PeriodTrial comparisons
Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) vs R-CHOP/CVP: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00877006

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00877006/results?page=2