ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00879333

Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 (Everolimus) Monotherapy Plus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC)

NCT00879333, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2015-04-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 (Everolimus) Monotherapy Plus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC). Trials, record NCT00879333. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00879333

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 (Everolimus) Monotherapy Plus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC)
NCT number
NCT00879333
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
656 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Advanced Gastric Cancer
Interventions
Everolimus, Everolimus placebo, Best Supportive Care (BSC)
First posted
2009-04-10
Last updated
2015-11-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2008-006544-20
Results first posted
2015-04-06
Limitations and caveats
4 randomized patients, 2 patients each from the everolimus and placebo arms were excluded from the safety analyses as they did not receive any dose of study treatment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)2.5 years
The primary objective of this study was to compare OS between everolimus + best supportive care (BSC) and placebo + BSC. OS, was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If at the analysis cut-off date a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of the last contact. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan Meier estimates method.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)2.5 years
Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, where progression was based on Investigator assessment of baseline and post-baseline scans according to RECIST. Progression free survival was censored if no PFS event was observed before the first to occur out of (i) the cut-off date, or (ii) the date when a further anticancer therapy was started. The censoring date was the date of the last adequate tumor assessment before either of these two events occurred. If a PFS event was observed after two or more missing or non-evaluable tumor assessments, then the date of progression was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment; for a PFS event observed after a single missing or non-evaluable tumor assessment, the actual date of disease progression was used. Anslsis was done using Kaplan-Meier estimates method.
SecondaryPatient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores2.5 years
The EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life sub-scale (QL) was pre-specified as the primary domain of interest, followed by physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF) and emotional functioning (EF).The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, along with a module specific for gastric cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-STO22), was used to evaluate PRO. The QLQ-C30 has five function scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and a global health status/quality of life scale. In addition, there are questions that assess specific symptoms. The QLQ-STO22 consists of 22 questions that make up five multi-item scales (dysphagia, pain, reflux, eating and anxiety) and four single-item scales (dry mouth, tasting, body image and hair loss).
SecondaryTime to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score2.5 years
The ECOG PS scale was used to classify patients according to their functional impairment, with scores ranging from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead). An analysis of the time to definitive deterioration of the ECOG PS by one category of the score from baseline was performed. Definitive deterioration was defined as a definitive increase by one category from baseline in ECOG PS, with no later improvements observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting an increase in ECOG PS is sufficient to consider it as a definitive worsening only if it was the last one available for the patient. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution function of time to definitive worsening.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)2.5 yearsORR was defined as the proportion of patients with measurable disease in whom best overall response (OR) was either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST criteria.
SecondaryEverolimus Steady State Concentraions at Predose (Cmin) and Cmax at Week 5Week 5
Cmin is the minimum (trough) steady-state drug concentration in the blood during multiple dosing and Cmax is the maximum (peak) blood drug concentration after dose administration. Cmax is estimated as the maximum of C1h and C2H. C1h is 1 hour post-dose blood concentration and C2h is 2 hour post-dose blood concentration. Only valid pre-dose (Cmin), C1h, and C2h everolimus samples were included in the analysis. Valid pre-dose samples were confirmed blood samples collected at steady-state, collected immediately prior to dosing on the same study day, and collected at approximately 24 ± 4 hours after the previous dose and with no vomiting within the first 4 hours following the last dose. Valid C1h and C2h samples were confirmed blood samples collected at steady-state and within ± 1 hour window and with no vomiting within the first 4 hours following the current and previous dose.
SecondaryEverolimus Steady State Concentraions at Predose (Cmin) and Cmax by Region Asia vs. Rest of the World (ROW) at Week 5Week 5
Cmin is the minimum (trough) steady-state drug concentration in the blood during multiple dosing and Cmax is the maximum (peak) blood drug concentration after dose administration. Cmax is estimated as the maximum of C1h and C2H. C1h is 1 hour post-dose blood concentration and C2h is 2 hour post-dose blood concentration. Only valid pre-dose (Cmin), C1h, and C2h everolimus samples were included in the analysis. Valid pre-dose samples were confirmed blood samples collected at steady-state, collected immediately prior to dosing on the same study day, and collected at approximately 24 ± 4 hours after the previous dose and with no vomiting within the first 4 hours following the last dose. Valid C1h and C2h samples were confirmed blood samples collected at steady-state and within ± 1 hour window and with no vomiting within the first 4 hours following the current and previous dose.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)2.5 years
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consists of all randomized patients. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment and stratum that they were assigned to at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)2.5 years
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consists of all randomized patients. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment and stratum that they were assigned to at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPatient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores2.5 years
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consists of all randomized patients. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment and stratum that they were assigned to at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Score2.5 years
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consists of all randomized patients. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment and stratum that they were assigned to at randomization.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (ORR)2.5 years
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consists of all randomized patients. Following the intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment and stratum that they were assigned to at randomization.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEverolimus Steady State Concentraions at Predose (Cmin) and Cmax at Week 5Week 5
PK analyses were based on the safety population in patients with evaluable samples. Only valid pre-dose (Cmin) \& Cmax everolimus samples were included. For patients who were unable to tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule, dose adjustments were allowed to keep the patient on study drug. Some patients had dose reductions to 5mg daily.
ng/mLMEAN
SECONDARYEverolimus Steady State Concentraions at Predose (Cmin) and Cmax by Region Asia vs. Rest of the World (ROW) at Week 5Week 5
PK analyses were based on the safety population in patients with evaluable samples. Only valid pre-dose (Cmin) \& Cmax everolimus samples were included. For patients who were unable to tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule, dose adjustments were allowed to keep the patient on study drug. Some patients had dose reductions to 5mg daily.
ng/mLMEAN

Results by group34

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Everolimus 10mg/Daily5.3995% Confidence Interval 4.80 to 6.01Months
Overall Survival (OS)Placebo4.3495% Confidence Interval 3.81 to 5.49Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Everolimus 10mg/Daily1.6895% Confidence Interval 1.51 to 1.94Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Placebo1.4195% Confidence Interval 1.38 to 1.45Months
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresEverolimus 10mg/DailyIn QL score by at least 5 % compared to baseline1.5195% Confidence Interval 1.28 to 1.84Months
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPlaceboIn QL score by at least 5 % compared to baseline1.4595% Confidence Interval 1.05 to 1.68Months
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresEverolimus 10mg/DailyIn PF score by at least 5 % compared to baseline1.3595% Confidence Interval 1.12 to 1.54Months
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPlaceboIn PF score by at least 5 % compared to baseline1.1595% Confidence Interval 1.02 to 1.64Months
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresEverolimus 10mg/DailyIn SF score by at least 5 % compared to baseline1.8795% Confidence Interval 1.84 to 2.30Months
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO): Time to Definitive Deterioration of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPlaceboIn SF score by at least 5 % compared to baseline1.8795% Confidence Interval 1.64 to 2.46Months

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEverolimus 10mg/Daily439
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo217
Overall StudyDiscontinued Study TreatmentEverolimus 10mg/Daily428
Overall StudyDiscontinued Study TreatmentPlacebo217
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEverolimus 10mg/Daily11
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEverolimus 10mg/Daily428
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo217

Adverse events494

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus 10mg / Daily108437
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo42215
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus 10mg / Daily30437
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo3215
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus 10mg / Daily47437
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo6215
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEverolimus 10mg / Daily77437
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo4215
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersEverolimus 10mg / Daily39437
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo20215

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEverolimus 10mg / Daily
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsEverolimus 10mg / Daily416437
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo193215
Total, serious adverse eventsEverolimus 10mg / Daily210437
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo89215

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
24043745DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Everolimus 10mg / Daily vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00879333

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00879333/results?page=2