ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00884377

Local Heat Therapy Versus Sodium Stibogluconate for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

NCT00884377, Phase 2, Completed, U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command; results first posted 2017-07-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Local Heat Therapy Versus Sodium Stibogluconate for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Trials, record NCT00884377. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00884377

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Local Heat Therapy Versus Sodium Stibogluconate for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
NCT number
NCT00884377
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
56 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Conditions
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
Interventions
Sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam), ThermoMed
First posted
2009-04-20
Last updated
2020-01-02
Results first posted
2017-07-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryEquivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureAssessment of cure is made at 2 months after treatment
Assess whether local heat therapy using the ThermoMed device was equivalent (clinical cure) in efficacy to 10 days of parenteral sodium stibogluconate. Clinical cure is defined as complete epithelialization of lesion. post-treatment, photographs of treated lesions were assessed for efficacy outcome by a consensus decision of leishmaniasis experts blinded as to each subject's study group. On the basis of these photo assessments, "clinical response" was assessed by lesion and by subject. In addition, an "overall response" was assigned ("healed" or "not healed") based on a combination of experts' photo assessments and subject interviews. Efficacy outcomes for the 2 study groups were compared using the Fishers exact test.
SecondaryEquivalence of Efficacy (Clinical Cure) of TheroMed Treatment vs Sodium Stibogluconate Assessed by the Number of Subjects With Clinical Cure12 months
Determine the equivalence of efficacy (clinical cure) of ThermoMed treatment vs sodium stibogluconate in clinical response of all skin lesions at 12 months. Clinical cure is defined as complete epithelialization of lesion. Post-treatment, photographs of treated lesions were assessed for efficacy outcome by a consensus decision of leishmaniasis experts blinded as to each subject's study group. On the basis of these photo assessments, "clinical response" was assessed by lesion and by subject. In addition, an "overall response" was assigned ("healed" or "not healed") based on a combination of experts' photo assessments and subject interviews. Efficacy outcomes for the 2 study groups were compared using the Fishers exact test.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Solicited Adverse EventsDays 3, 7 and 10To compare the toxicity profiles of ThermoMed treatment versus parenteral sodium stibogluconate therapy thru specific solicited adverse events
SecondaryImmune Response, Based on T-Cell Population Before Treatment, and Day 10 Following Treatmentsday 1 and day 10
Evaluate the immune response (T-Cell population) to Leishmania before treatment, and at 10 days, in recipients of localized heat therapy vs systemic sodium stibogluconate. Days 1 and 10 are presented in columns.
SecondaryImmune Response, Based on Percent of T-Cell Population Before Treatment, and Day 10 Following Treatmentsday 1 and day 10
Evaluate the immune response (T-Cell population) to Leishmania before treatment, and at 10 days, in recipients of localized heat therapy vs systemic sodium stibogluconate. Days 1 and 10 are presented in columns.
SecondaryFeasibility of a L. Major Species Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction as a Rapid Diagnostic Device in the Context of a Treatment Trialat baseline before treatment
Evaluate the feasibility of using species-specific PCR as a rapid diagnostic assay for L. major infection. The comparator modalities were: histopathology (identification of amastigotes); speciation determined through culture and isoenzyme analysis; and genus and species-specific PCR. Species PCR testing was performed at baseline to allow for the identification of L. major as each subject's infecting parasite. If an L. major infection could not be confirmed in a subject's lesion(s), then that subject could not be treated under this protocol.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYEquivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureAssessment of cure is made at 2 months after treatment
A sample size of 27 subjects per treatment group was planned based on the assumption that the cure rate in the heat treatment arm would be 73% (Navin et al., 1990), compared to a 99% cure rate in the sodium stibogluconate arm (Wortmann et al., 2002).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYEquivalence of Efficacy (Clinical Cure) of TheroMed Treatment vs Sodium Stibogluconate Assessed by the Number of Subjects With Clinical Cure12 monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Solicited Adverse EventsDays 3, 7 and 10Data ia showing only subjects with specified solicited symptoms on Days 3, 7 and 10. Collective count of participants for SSG is 53 and 28 for ThermoMed over all reported days.subjects showing specified symptomsNUMBER
SECONDARYImmune Response, Based on T-Cell Population Before Treatment, and Day 10 Following Treatmentsday 1 and day 10Populations of T-cells CD3+CD8, CD19, CD16+CD56 on study days 1 and 10populations of T-cellsMEAN
SECONDARYImmune Response, Based on Percent of T-Cell Population Before Treatment, and Day 10 Following Treatmentsday 1 and day 10Percent of T-cells CD3+CD8, CD19, CD16+CD56 on study days 1 and 10% of T-cellsMEAN
SECONDARYFeasibility of a L. Major Species Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction as a Rapid Diagnostic Device in the Context of a Treatment Trialat baseline before treatmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group144

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureSodium StibogluconateHealed22Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureThermoMed DeviceHealed18Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureSodium StibogluconateNot Healed5Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureThermoMed DeviceNot Healed9Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureSodium StibogluconateNot Applicable1Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureThermoMed DeviceNot Applicable1Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureSodium StibogluconateCured13Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureThermoMed DeviceCured11Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureSodium StibogluconateNot Cured13Participants
Equivalence of Efficacy Assessed by the Number of Participants With Clinical CureThermoMed DeviceNot Cured14Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment With IV Sodium Stibogluconate28
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment With Thermomed Device28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment With IV Sodium Stibogluconate26
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment With Thermomed Device27
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment With IV Sodium Stibogluconate2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment With Thermomed Device1

Adverse events116

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLesion site blisterSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous0280
otherLesion site blisterSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersThermoMed Device252825
otherNo blanching with pressureVascular disordersSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous1281
otherNo blanching with pressureVascular disordersThermoMed Device182818
otherSite erythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous5285
otherSite erythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersThermoMed Device212821
otherSite escharInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous9289
otherSite escharInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsThermoMed Device252825
otherSite infectionInfections and infestationsSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous1281
otherSite infectionInfections and infestationsThermoMed Device5285

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySodium Stibogluconate Intravenous028
Total, all-cause mortalityThermoMed Device028
Total, other adverse eventsSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous2828
Total, other adverse eventsThermoMed Device2828
Total, serious adverse eventsSodium Stibogluconate Intravenous528
Total, serious adverse eventsThermoMed Device228

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
20231896DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Sodium Stibogluconate Intravenous vs ThermoMed Device: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Sodium Stibogluconate Intravenous vs ThermoMed Device: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00884377

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00884377/results?page=2