ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00889603

Non-Interventional Study With Aricept® Evess

NCT00889603, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2011-03-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Non-Interventional Study With Aricept® Evess. Trials, record NCT00889603. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00889603

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Non-Interventional Study With Aricept® Evess
NCT number
NCT00889603
Status
Completed
Enrollment
370 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Alzheimer's Disease, Vascular Dementia
Interventions
Aricept® Evess
First posted
2009-04-29
Last updated
2011-03-31
Results first posted
2011-03-31
Limitations and caveats
FAQ Change from baseline not analyzed, a note to file was issued stating it was removed from protocol but erroneously remained in statistical analysis section. Patient Domain of Benefit, Week 24 LOCF not analyzed; endpoint only collected at Week 24.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total at Week 24 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Baseline and Week 24
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week 24 LOCF minus mean score at baseline.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MMSE TotalBaseline, Week 8, 16, and 24
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change: least squares (LS) mean score at observation minus LS mean score at baseline. Changes from baseline at each week were controlled for baseline MMSE.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ)Baseline and Week 24
Participants completed the FAQ for physical function. Overall scores could have ranged from 0 (independent) to 30 (dependent) where lower scores represented an improvement in physical function. Change from baseline was to be calculated as baseline scores minus week 24 scores.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8Week 8
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 16Week 16
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24Week 24
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24 LOCFWeek 24
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
SecondaryNumber of Participants in Each Patient Domain of BenefitWeek 24
Participants asked to indicate if the cognition, functionality, and/or behavior domain were most benefited/improved after treatment (dichotomous yes/no endpoints where checking the CRF box next to each domain indicated 'yes' and leaving a box blank indicated 'no').
OtherNumber of Participants With Treatment TolerabilityWeek 24Overall Evaluation of Tolerability at Week 24; 1=Very good, 2=Good, 3=Moderate, 4=Poor
OtherNumber of Participants Receiving Other MedicationsBaseline and Week 24Information collected and recorded by investigator in accordance with existing medical records. World Health Organization- Drug (WHO-Drug) coding dictionary applied.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total at Week 24 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Baseline and Week 24Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants who received at least 1 dose of Donepezil and had at least 1 postbaseline efficacy evaluation. LOCF was used. N=number of participants with evaluable data.Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MMSE TotalBaseline, Week 8, 16, and 24FAS. N=number of participants with evaluable data.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ)Baseline and Week 24FAS. Data not analyzedScores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8Week 8FAS. N=number of participants with evaluable data.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 16Week 16FAS. N=number of participants with evaluable data.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24Week 24FAS. N=number of participants with evaluable data.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24 LOCFWeek 24FAS; LOCF. N=number of participants with evaluable data.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants in Each Patient Domain of BenefitWeek 24Safety population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. N=number of participants with evaluable data. Week 24 LOCF not reported as data only collected at Week 24.ParticipantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants With Treatment TolerabilityWeek 24Safety population; N=number of particpants with evaluable data.ParticipantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Participants Receiving Other MedicationsBaseline and Week 24Safety populationParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group39

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total at Week 24 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Donepezil1.92Standard Error 0.14Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in MMSE TotalDonepezilWeek 8 (N=348)0.92Standard Error 0.09Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in MMSE TotalDonepezilWeek 16 (N=340)1.56Standard Error 0.12Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in MMSE TotalDonepezilWeek 24 (N=327)1.97Standard Error 0.14Scores on a scale
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8DonepezilVery much improved5Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8DonepezilMuch improved68Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8DonepezilMinimally improved194Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8DonepezilNo change74Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8DonepezilMinimally worse8Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8DonepezilMuch worse2Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDonepezil370
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDonepezil333
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDonepezil37

Adverse events39

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersDonepezil1370
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDonepezil2370
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersDonepezil1370
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersDonepezil11370
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersDonepezil2370
otherIrritabilityGeneral disordersDonepezil1370
otherWeight decreasedInvestigationsDonepezil1370
otherMyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDonepezil1370
otherAphasiaNervous system disordersDonepezil1370
otherCerebral disorderNervous system disordersDonepezil1370

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDonepezil
Total, other adverse eventsDonepezil52370
Total, serious adverse eventsDonepezil12370

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00889603

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00889603/results?page=2