ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00891046

An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Active Systemic Manifestations Manifestations and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever.

NCT00891046, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2017-03-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Active Systemic Manifestations Manifestations and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever. Trials, record NCT00891046. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00891046

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Active Systemic Manifestations Manifestations and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever.
NCT number
NCT00891046
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
270 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Interventions
Canakinumab
First posted
2009-04-30
Last updated
2019-03-26
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2008-008008-42
Results first posted
2017-03-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the StudyFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)
Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
SecondaryPercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of -CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6 worsening by more than 30%. For minimum adapted ACR paediatric scores, the last measurement recorded from the participant's previous study was considered baseline for the current study.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
Steroid tapering with oral steroids was allowed if the participant achieved an adapted ACR Paediatric 50 response and had no fever. A participant was considered to have tapered steroids successfully, if the steroid dose was reduced from baseline and the participant did not flare and maintained a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. A participant was considered to have unsuccessfully tapered steroids if the steroid dose was reduced during the study but dose at last assessment was equal to or greater than dose at baseline or; if steroid dose was reduced but the participant did not maintain a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kgBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
The canakinumab dose could be reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg in participants who were steroid-free, if requested by the treating physician and agreed by the sponsor. For treatment naive participants , dose reduction was allowed after the participant had received 6 months treatment with canakinumab.

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)The analysis was performed in safety set (SS), defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the StudyFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)The analysis was performed on the SS population.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the StudyFrom start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)The analysis was performed in SS population.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treatment naive: Group 2' there were no participants who had discontinued other biologics due to safety/tolerability issues.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlier
The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treated: Group 2 (Completed core study)' there were no Non-Responders participants available.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of StudyBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free RegimenBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants who were steroid users at baseline.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kgBaseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierThe analysis was done in FAS population.participantsNUMBER

Results by group198

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 Treatment NaiveAEs108participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 TreatedAEs137participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 Treatment NaiveSAEs40participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 TreatedSAEs47participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 Treatment NaiveDiscontinuation due to any AE14participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 TreatedDiscontinuation due to any AE18participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 Treatment NaiveDiscontinuation due to any SAE13participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 TreatedDiscontinuation due to any SAE14participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 Treatment NaiveTreatment Related AEs44participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAEACZ885 TreatedTreatment Related AEs57participants

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)33
Overall StudySTARTEDACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)63
Overall StudySTARTEDACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)40
Overall StudySTARTEDACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)11
Overall StudySTARTEDACZ885 Treatment Naive123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)54
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDACZ885 Treatment Naive84

Adverse events318

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersACZ885 Treated10147
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersACZ885 Treatment Naive7123
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treated21147
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treatment Naive22123
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treated18147
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treatment Naive13123
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treated30147
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treatment Naive16123
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treated17147
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersACZ885 Treatment Naive11123

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityACZ885 Treated
Total, all-cause mortalityACZ885 Treatment Naive
Total, other adverse eventsACZ885 Treated124147
Total, other adverse eventsACZ885 Treatment Naive91123
Total, serious adverse eventsACZ885 Treated47147
Total, serious adverse eventsACZ885 Treatment Naive40123

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26314396DERIVEDPubMed
30269054DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
ACZ885 Treatment Naive vs ACZ885 Treated: Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the StudyTrial comparisons
ACZ885 Treated vs ACZ885 Treatment Naive: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00891046

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00891046/results?page=2