ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00893113

An Efficacy Study to Evaluate Alfuzosin to Treat Men With Erectile Dysfunction and Mild Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

NCT00893113, Phase 3, Completed, Chesapeake Urology Research Associates; results first posted 2016-08-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Efficacy Study to Evaluate Alfuzosin to Treat Men With Erectile Dysfunction and Mild Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Trials, record NCT00893113. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00893113

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Efficacy Study to Evaluate Alfuzosin to Treat Men With Erectile Dysfunction and Mild Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
NCT number
NCT00893113
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
74 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
Conditions
Erectile Dysfunction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Interventions
Placebo, Alfuzosin
First posted
2009-05-05
Last updated
2018-03-09
Results first posted
2016-08-01
Limitations and caveats
Data compiled in this study is unable to neither prove nor disprove the objectives set. Placebo effect and recall bias may affect results. Regular sexual interaction and prior exposure to Alfuzosin were not evaluated.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile FunctionBaseline and 12 Weeks
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is used for the evaluation of male sexual function and diagnostic evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction (ED) severity. There are 5 domains of the IIEF: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. The Erectile Function (EF) domain of the IIEF is used to assess specific key components of ED including ability to achieve penetration and ability to maintain erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each question of the IIEF. The EF domain pertains to questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 15. Scores are totaled and ranges are assigned to results. In the EF domain, a score of 0-30 is possible. The EF scores can be interpreted as follows: 0-6 severe dysfunction, 7-12 moderate dysfunction, 13-18 mild to moderate dysfunction, 19-24 mild dysfunction, and 25-30 no dysfunction.
SecondaryChanges in American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom IndexBaseline and 12 Weeks
The American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Index is used to evaluate the severity of the patient's enlarged prostate symptoms. The AUA Symptom Index is completed by the patient. Questions are based on patient experiences in the past month and are answered on a scale of 0-5 (0 = not at all, 1 = less than one time in 5, 2 = less than half the time, 3 = about half the time, 4 = more than half the time, 5 = almost always). The scores are totaled and ranked as follows: mild (1-7), moderate (8-19), and severe (20-35).
SecondaryChange in Total International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) ScoreBaseline and 12 Weeks
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is used for the evaluation of male sexual function and diagnostic evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction (ED) severity. There are 5 domains of the IIEF: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each question of the IIEF. Total IIEF scores range from 0-75. Lower scores indicate severe erectile dysfunction (0=severe erectile dysfunction), while higher scores indicate less erectile dysfunction (75=no erectile dysfunction).

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile FunctionBaseline and 12 Weeks
The evaluable set includes all subjects who have sufficient data to assess the primary efficacy endpoint, and who have no major protocol deviations. Subjects were analyzed according to randomized treatment. Data for 45 subjects was analyzed.
Change in EF Domain Score from BaselineMEAN
SECONDARYChanges in American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom IndexBaseline and 12 Weeks
The evaluable set includes all subjects who have sufficient data to assess the primary efficacy endpoint, and who have no major protocol deviations. Subjects were analyzed according to randomized treatment. Data for 45 subjects was analyzed.
Change in AUA Score From BaselineMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Total International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) ScoreBaseline and 12 Weeks
The evaluable set includes all subjects who have sufficient data to assess the primary efficacy endpoint, and who have no major protocol deviations. Subjects were analyzed according to randomized treatment. Data for 45 subjects was analyzed.
Change in Total IIEF Score from BaselineMEAN

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile FunctionPlacebo2.84Standard Deviation 7.492Change in EF Domain Score from Baseline
Change From Baseline Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile FunctionAlfuzosin2.84Standard Deviation 8.704Change in EF Domain Score from Baseline
Changes in American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom IndexPlacebo-.1333Standard Deviation 4.984Change in AUA Score From Baseline
Changes in American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom IndexAlfuzosin.4222Standard Deviation 5.345Change in AUA Score From Baseline
Change in Total International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) ScorePlacebo4.644Standard Deviation 14.872Change in Total IIEF Score from Baseline
Change in Total International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) ScoreAlfuzosin6.24Standard Deviation 15.876Change in Total IIEF Score from Baseline

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin36
Overall StudySTARTEDAlfuzosin, Then Placebo38
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin23
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAlfuzosin, Then Placebo22
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin13
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAlfuzosin, Then Placebo16

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousSyncopeMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin1361
seriousSyncopeMetabolism and nutrition disordersAlfuzosin, Then Placebo0380
seriousShortness of BreathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin0360
seriousShortness of BreathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersAlfuzosin, Then Placebo1381

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin
Total, all-cause mortalityAlfuzosin, Then Placebo
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin036
Total, other adverse eventsAlfuzosin, Then Placebo038
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo, Then Alfuzosin136
Total, serious adverse eventsAlfuzosin, Then Placebo138

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Placebo, Then Alfuzosin vs Alfuzosin, Then Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00893113

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00893113/registered