ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00895817

Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis

NCT00895817, Not applicable, Completed, Walter Reed Army Medical Center; results first posted 2013-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Trials, record NCT00895817. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00895817

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT number
NCT00895817
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
42 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Conditions
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Interventions
Swallowed fluticasone, Esomeprazole
First posted
2009-05-08
Last updated
2013-03-12
Results first posted
2013-03-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Responded8 weeksHistologic resolution of esophageal eosinophilia. Response is defined as achieving \< 7 eosinophils/high power field in both the proximal and distal esophagus.
SecondarySymptom Score8 weeksUsing a validated questionnaire, symptoms will be assessed at baseline and following therapy.
SecondaryEndoscopic Change8 weeksFollowing therapy, resolution of EE findings will be assessed.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Who Responded8 weeks
Sample size estimation was based on the assumptions:10% of the EE patients will respond to PPI compared to 55% of patients treated with steroids. Controlling the probability of a Type I error at alpha=0.05, a sample of 38 patients in the treatment groups (19 in each arm) will have 80% power to detect a difference in treatment response of 45%.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSymptom Score8 weeks
SECONDARYEndoscopic Change8 weeks

Results by group2

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Who RespondedEsomeprazole7participants
Number of Participants Who RespondedSwallowed Fluticasone4participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEsomeprazole21
Overall StudySTARTEDSwallowed Fluticasone21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEsomeprazole21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSwallowed Fluticasone21
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEsomeprazole0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSwallowed Fluticasone0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEsomeprazole
Total, all-cause mortalitySwallowed Fluticasone
Total, other adverse eventsEsomeprazole021
Total, other adverse eventsSwallowed Fluticasone021
Total, serious adverse eventsEsomeprazole021
Total, serious adverse eventsSwallowed Fluticasone021

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Esomeprazole vs Swallowed Fluticasone: Number of Participants Who RespondedTrial comparisons
Esomeprazole vs Swallowed Fluticasone: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00895817

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00895817/registered