ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00904618

Safety and Efficacy Study on the Implantation of the Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT-Secur) Under Local Anesthesia

NCT00904618, Phase 2, Completed, Université de Sherbrooke; results first posted 2009-05-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy Study on the Implantation of the Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT-Secur) Under Local Anesthesia. Trials, record NCT00904618. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00904618

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study on the Implantation of the Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT-Secur) Under Local Anesthesia
NCT number
NCT00904618
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
48 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Conditions
Urinary Stress Incontinence
Interventions
TVT-SECUR - 'Hammock' technique, TVT-SECUR - 'U-Method', Local anesthesia (30 to 40 ml of a mixture of 35 ml of lidocaine 2% and 5 ml of bicarbonate 3%).
First posted
2009-05-19
Last updated
2009-05-19
Results first posted
2009-05-19
Limitations and caveats
The single-surgeon single-center experience and the lack of objective outcome evaluation. A measurement bias of the 'U-Method' because of a learning curve for the cases using the 'Hammock' technique.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryLocal Anesthesia SatisfactionQuestionnaire filled 1 week after surgeryLocal anesthesia satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire completed by the patients. The patients were asked if they would recommend this type of anesthesia (yes or no).
SecondaryImprovement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.Six months
A questionnaire with a Likert scale from one to five was used to assess the improvement in stress urinary symptoms at six months for each technique, the 'Hammock' technique and the 'U-Method' (1-Worst, 2-Same, 3-Improved, 4-Almost cured, 5-Cured). Patients had to answer 3 or more on the scale to be considered improved.
SecondarySafety of the Sling.15 months
Safety of the sling was assessed with a record of perioperative and postoperative complications. The following are all the complications experienced with the TVT-SECUR for each technique, the 'Hammock' technique and the 'U-Method'.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYLocal Anesthesia SatisfactionQuestionnaire filled 1 week after surgery2 patients did not fill out the questionnaire 1 week after surgeryparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYImprovement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.Six months
The 'Hammock' technique, similar to the transobturator tape dissection, was used in the first 23 cases and the 'U-Method', similar to the retropubic tape dissection, in the last 25 cases. Seven patients for the 'Hammock' technique and three patients for the 'U-Method' did not fill out the questionnaire at six months.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSafety of the Sling.15 months
The 'Hammock' technique, similar to the transobturator tape dissection, was used in the first 23 cases and the 'U-Method', similar to the retropubic tape dissection, in the last 25 cases. Interim analysis performed after 23 cases led us to change the technique to the 'U-Method'.
ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Local Anesthesia SatisfactionTVT-SECURYes43participants
Local Anesthesia SatisfactionTVT-SECURNo3participants
Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.'Hammock' TechniqueImproved11participants
Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.U-MethodImproved22participants
Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.'Hammock' TechniqueNot improved5participants
Improvement in Stress Urinary Symptoms.U-MethodNot improved0participants
Safety of the Sling.'Hammock' TechniquePerioperative urethral laceration0Participants
Safety of the Sling.U-MethodPerioperative urethral laceration1Participants
Safety of the Sling.'Hammock' TechniquePostoperative vaginal erosions6Participants
Safety of the Sling.U-MethodPostoperative vaginal erosions0Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTVT-SECUR48
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTVT-SECUR48
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTVT-SECUR0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTVT-SECUR
Total, other adverse eventsTVT-SECUR
Total, serious adverse eventsTVT-SECUR

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00904618

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00904618/registered